Xie Xiaoming, Zhang Kuayue, Li Yuan, Li Xinyi, Lin Yi, Huang Liangqing, Tian Guihua
Beijing Massage Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09089-0.
The importance of Transport-related Physical Activity in chronic disease management is increasingly recognized. Previous studies have reported relationships between different modes of transportation and the risk of osteoarthritis (OA), but the conclusions across studies have been inconsistent. Body Mass Index (BMI) has been shown to be directly associated with different transportation modes and is also a significant risk factor for OA. Therefore, our study aims to investigate the causal relationship between different modes of transportation and OA, mediated by BMI, using Mendelian randomization (MR) and mediation analysis.
Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for different transportation modes were extracted from the IEU openGWAS database as exposure data. GWAS summary data for BMI were used as potential mediator variables, and OA data from the IEU openGWAS database were used as outcome data. A two-sample, two-step MR analysis was performed using the Inverse-Variance Weighted (IVW) method to investigate the causal relationships between different modes of transportation and OA, as well as the mediating role of BMI in these associations. Supplementary analyses were conducted using the weighted median method and MR-Egger regression. Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity among the SNPs, and the MR-Egger intercept test was applied to examine horizontal pleiotropy.
The MR analysis revealed significant associations between transportation modes and the risk of OA. Cycling (OR = 0.568, 95% CI = 0.325-0.991, P = 0.047), public transportation (OR = 0.584, 95% CI = 0.426-0.802, P = 0.0009), and walking (OR = 0.497, 95% CI = 0.376-0.657, P < 0.0001) were negatively associated with OA risk, whereas driving (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.018-1.385, P = 0.029) was positively associated with OA risk. Mediation analysis indicated that BMI partially mediated the causal relationship between cycling, public transportation, walking, driving, and OA risk, with mediation proportions of 69.6%, 31.9%, 25.0%, and 39.8%, respectively. Cochran's Q test indicated some heterogeneity among the SNPs included in the analysis, and the MR-Egger intercept test suggested no evidence of genetic pleiotropy.
Genetically predicted walking, cycling, or public transportation use was negatively associated with the risk of OA, whereas driving increased the risk of OA. BMI mediated over 25% of the causal relationship between different transportation modes and OA.
Not applicable.
与交通相关的体力活动在慢性病管理中的重要性日益得到认可。既往研究报告了不同交通方式与骨关节炎(OA)风险之间的关系,但各研究结论并不一致。体重指数(BMI)已被证明与不同交通方式直接相关,也是OA的一个重要风险因素。因此,我们的研究旨在使用孟德尔随机化(MR)和中介分析来研究由BMI介导的不同交通方式与OA之间的因果关系。
从IEU开放GWAS数据库中提取不同交通方式的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据作为暴露数据。BMI的GWAS汇总数据用作潜在中介变量,IEU开放GWAS数据库中的OA数据用作结局数据。采用逆方差加权(IVW)方法进行两样本、两步MR分析,以研究不同交通方式与OA之间的因果关系,以及BMI在这些关联中的中介作用。使用加权中位数方法和MR-Egger回归进行补充分析。采用Cochran's Q检验评估单核苷酸多态性(SNP)之间的异质性,并应用MR-Egger截距检验来检验水平多效性。
MR分析显示交通方式与OA风险之间存在显著关联。骑自行车(比值比[OR]=0.568,95%置信区间[CI]=0.325-0.991,P=0.047)、乘坐公共交通(OR=0.584,95%CI=0.426-0.802,P=0.0009)和步行(OR=0.497,95%CI=0.376-0.657,P<0.0001)与OA风险呈负相关,而开车(OR=1.19,95%CI=1.018-1.385,P=0.029)与OA风险呈正相关。中介分析表明,BMI部分介导了骑自行车、乘坐公共交通、步行、开车与OA风险之间的因果关系,中介比例分别为69.6%、31.9%、25.0%和39.8%。Cochran's Q检验表明分析中纳入的SNP之间存在一些异质性,MR-Egger截距检验未提示基因多效性的证据。
遗传预测的步行、骑自行车或乘坐公共交通与OA风险呈负相关,而开车会增加OA风险。BMI介导了不同交通方式与OA之间超过25%的因果关系。
不适用。