Gee MaKenzie, Taylor Heather, Yeager Valerie A
Author Affiliation: Department of Health Policy and Management at the Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002189.
The purpose of this study is to examine competency gaps among governmental public health workers with and without the Certified in Public Health (CPH) credential, specifically among the majority of the workforce without a formal public health degree.
This cross-sectional study uses 2021 Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) data. Multivariate logistic regressions of reported skill gaps were performed while controlling for gender, age, race/ethnicity, public health degree attainment, role type, current employer, and tenure in public health practice.
A nationally representative sample of governmental public health employees.
36 752 U.S. governmental public health employees across local and state health agencies representing 47 states.
Self-reported competency gaps.
Among nonsupervisors without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had lower odds of reporting competency gaps in 3 of the 23 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. Among supervisors/managers without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had lower odds of reporting competency gaps in 6 of the 24 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. Among executives without a formal public health degree, those with a CPH had no significant differences in reporting competency gaps in any of the 24 skills assessed compared to those without a CPH. When looking at the public health workforce as a whole, both with and without formal public health degrees, there were few significant competency gap differences between workers with and without the CPH.
Having a CPH is associated with fewer self-reported competency gaps, specifically among the 85% of governmental public health employees without a public health degree. Thus, the CPH may be valuable to the sizable governmental public health workforce that does not have a formal education in public health. The CPH seems to be less impactful for executives compared to other supervisory levels.
本研究旨在调查拥有和未拥有公共卫生认证(CPH)资质的政府公共卫生工作者之间的能力差距,特别是在大多数没有正规公共卫生学位的劳动力中。
这项横断面研究使用了2021年公共卫生劳动力兴趣与需求调查(PH WINS)的数据。在控制性别、年龄、种族/民族、公共卫生学位获得情况、角色类型、当前雇主以及公共卫生实践任期的同时,对报告的技能差距进行多变量逻辑回归分析。
美国政府公共卫生雇员的全国代表性样本。
来自代表47个州的地方和州卫生机构的36752名美国政府公共卫生雇员。
自我报告的能力差距。
在没有正规公共卫生学位的非主管人员中,拥有CPH的人员在23项评估技能中的3项上报告能力差距的几率低于没有CPH的人员。在没有正规公共卫生学位的主管/经理中,拥有CPH的人员在24项评估技能中的6项上报告能力差距的几率低于没有CPH的人员。在没有正规公共卫生学位的行政人员中,拥有CPH的人员在24项评估技能中的任何一项上报告能力差距与没有CPH的人员相比均无显著差异。从整体公共卫生劳动力来看,无论有无正规公共卫生学位,拥有和没有CPH的工作人员之间在能力差距方面几乎没有显著差异。
拥有CPH与自我报告的能力差距较少相关,特别是在85%没有公共卫生学位的政府公共卫生雇员中。因此,CPH对于没有接受过公共卫生正规教育的大量政府公共卫生劳动力可能具有价值。与其他监督级别相比,CPH对行政人员的影响似乎较小。