• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

权衡利弊:量化美国医师执照考试第一步通过/未通过评分对综合整形外科匹配中申请解读的影响。

Tipping the Scales: Quantifying the Impact of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Scoring on Application Interpretation in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.

作者信息

Bird Cole, Godbe Kerilyn N, Nazir Niaman, Braun Sterling, Farmer Rebecca, Korentager Richard

机构信息

University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.

Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2025 Sep;82(9):103625. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103625. Epub 2025 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103625
PMID:40694863
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The United States Medical Licensing Exam® (USMLE®) Step 1 exam implemented pass/fail scoring to "create a more holistic residency application selection process." We aimed to assess whether this transition favored holistic review or redirected emphasis to other metrics.

DESIGN

Quantifiable data from 330 Plastic Surgery Common Applications (PSCAs) submitted to a single academic center were collected. Applicants were stratified into 2 groups based on numeric or pass/fail Step 1 score. Logistic regression was performed for each group to assess the odds of matching based on quantifiable application components.

SETTING

2023-2024 Match cycle.

PARTICIPANTS

330 integrated plastic surgery applicants.

RESULTS

A total of 137 applications reported numeric Step 1 scores, while 193 reported pass/fail scores. For applicants with a numeric Step 1 score, the factors most predictive of matching were Step 2 score >265 (OR 159 [95% CI, 6.6-999], Step 1 Score between 240 and 250 (OR 21.8 [95% CI, 4.8-98.6]), and being a U.S. citizen (OR 21.1 [95% CI, 3.9-116]). Letter of recommendation numeric strength (OR 11.0 [95% CI, 2.7-45.6]) was also a significant match predictor, followed by more than 16 podium presentations (OR 10.8 [95% CI, 2.6-45.5]). In comparison, for students with pass/fail Step 1 scores, there were only 3 significant factors that predicted a successful match: strength of recommendation letters (OR 3.7 [95% CI, 1.8-7.6]), Alpha Omega Alpha society membership (OR 3.2 [95% CI, 1.3-7.7]), and graduation from a U.S News and World Report top 40 medical school in research (OR 3.0 [95% CI, 1.5-6.1]).

CONCLUSION

For applicants with a numeric Step 1 score, Step 1 and 2 scores remained the most critical match factors. In comparison, letter of recommendation strength and graduation from a top 40 medical school were most important for applicants with pass/fail scoring, indicating a shift toward other application metrics following the scoring change.

摘要

目的

美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步考试采用通过/失败计分制,以“创建一个更全面的住院医师申请选拔过程”。我们旨在评估这一转变是有利于全面评估,还是将重点重新转向其他指标。

设计

收集了提交给一个学术中心的330份整形外科通用申请(PSCA)的可量化数据。申请人根据第一步考试的数字分数或通过/失败分数分为两组。对每组进行逻辑回归分析,以评估基于可量化申请组成部分匹配的几率。

背景

2023 - 2024年的匹配周期。

参与者

330名综合整形外科申请人。

结果

共有137份申请报告了第一步考试的数字分数,193份报告了通过/失败分数。对于第一步考试有数字分数的申请人,最能预测匹配的因素是第二步考试分数>265(比值比[OR]159[95%置信区间,6.6 - 999]),第一步考试分数在240至250之间(OR 21.8[95%置信区间,4.8 - 98.6]),以及是美国公民(OR 21.1[95%置信区间,3.9 - 116])。推荐信的数字强度(OR 11.0[95%置信区间,2.7 - 45.6])也是一个显著的匹配预测因素,其次是超过16次讲台展示(OR 10.8[95%置信区间,2.6 - 45.5])。相比之下,对于第一步考试采用通过/失败计分的学生,只有3个显著因素预测成功匹配:推荐信的强度(OR 3.7[95%置信区间,1.8 - 7.6]),美国医学荣誉协会会员资格(OR

相似文献

1
Tipping the Scales: Quantifying the Impact of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Scoring on Application Interpretation in the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match.权衡利弊:量化美国医师执照考试第一步通过/未通过评分对综合整形外科匹配中申请解读的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2025 Sep;82(9):103625. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103625. Epub 2025 Jul 21.
2
The Effect of Numeric Versus Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 Scores in the Integrated Plastic Surgery 2023-2024 Match Cycle: A Single Institution Study.数值评分与通过/不通过评分对 2023-2024 年综合整形外科 USMLE 步骤 1 成绩的影响:单机构研究。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Nov;81(11):1667-1674. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.025. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
3
The Perfect Orthopedic Surgery Applicant?: Exploring Trends in the National Resident Matching Program "Charting Outcomes in the Match" Reports.完美的骨科手术申请者?:探索全国住院医师匹配计划“匹配中的结果记录”报告中的趋势。
J Surg Educ. 2025 Sep;82(9):103616. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103616. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
4
Factors That Predict Success in the General Surgery Match With a Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 Exam.预测普通外科住院医师匹配成功且美国医师执照考试第一步为通过/未通过的因素。
Am Surg. 2025 Sep;91(9):1518-1525. doi: 10.1177/00031348251338735. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
5
Impact of Interview Modality on Gender Disparities in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Residency Match Success.面试方式对整形与重建外科住院医师匹配成功中性别差异的影响。
J Surg Educ. 2025 May;82(5):103464. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103464. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
6
Publication Trends of Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicants Without Numeric Step 1 Scores.无第一步考试数字成绩的整形外科住院医师申请人的发表趋势
J Surg Educ. 2025 Sep;82(9):103598. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103598. Epub 2025 Jul 26.
7
Association of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Reporting with Interview and Match Outcomes.美国医师执照考试(USMLE)步骤 1 通过/不通过报告与面试和匹配结果的关联。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Oct;81(10):1428-1436. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.019. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Unveiling the Need to Improve Personalized Applicant Tools: A Critical Evaluation of the Reliability of the Texas STAR database in Predicting Match Success for Plastic Surgery Applicants.揭示改进个性化申请人工具的必要性:对德州 STAR 数据库预测整形手术申请人匹配成功率的可靠性进行批判性评估。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Sep;81(9):1320-1330. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
9
Ophthalmology Residency Program Director Survey on Pass/Fail U.S. Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 Scoring.眼科住院医师培训项目主任关于美国医师执照考试第一步及格/不及格评分的调查。
J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2023 Nov 14;15(2):e243-e247. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771034. eCollection 2023 Jul.
10
Understanding COMLEX-USA Level-1 as a Pass/Fail examination: impact and opportunities.将美国国家综合医学执照考试第一级理解为一项及格/不及格考试:影响与机遇。
J Osteopath Med. 2025 Mar 11;125(8):399-404. doi: 10.1515/jom-2024-0139. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.