Suppr超能文献

将美国国家综合医学执照考试第一级理解为一项及格/不及格考试:影响与机遇。

Understanding COMLEX-USA Level-1 as a Pass/Fail examination: impact and opportunities.

作者信息

Gerhardson Ashley, Efurd Melissa, Sexton Patricia, Sefcik Donald

机构信息

Office of Academic Affairs and Institutional Research, 506528 Arkansas Colleges of Health Education , Fort Smith, AR, USA.

Department of Medical Education and Department of Family Medicine at A.T. Still University Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine, Kirksville, MO, USA.

出版信息

J Osteopath Med. 2025 Mar 11;125(8):399-404. doi: 10.1515/jom-2024-0139. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.

Abstract

CONTEXT

In late 2020, the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME) announced that the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) Level 1 would discontinue reporting numeric scores, only providing a Pass/Fail designation. The National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) changed the core reports for the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 to Pass/Fail in early 2020. Subsequently, residency program directors were reported to migrate toward increased reliance on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE and USMLE Step 2CK scores, the prestige of medical schools, and the status of the authors of letters of reference during their review of residency applicants.

OBJECTIVES

Funded by an American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) research grant, A.T. Still University - Kirksville College of Osteopathic Medicine (ATSU-KCOM) and the Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine (ARCOM) generated a series of five hypotheses to investigate the perceived impact of the transition to Pass/Fail scoring.

METHODS

Both institutional review boards (IRBs) provided exempt status for this study. The hypotheses were examined through surveys distributed to current osteopathic medical students (OMS), recent graduates (classes of 2021 and 2022), academic advisors, and college of osteopathic medicine (COM) curriculum committee members in this cohort study. The investigative process consisted of two surveys: an initial survey to collect data on all five hypotheses and a focused, follow-up survey designed to better understand the impact of the scoring change. The surveys collected respondent feedback based on a Likert Scale. Standard descriptive statistics were assembled and analyzed. Qualitative responses were coded into thematic elements to examine response patterns.

RESULTS

The initial survey collected responses from 302 respondents (23.2 % response rate) based on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The survey results revealed the means for the following items based on a 4-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Disagree; 2=Disagree; 3=Agree; 4=Strongly Agree): (1) Increase chances of matching into residency: 2.35; (2) Pass/Fail is a positive change: 2.71; (3) Pass/Fail will reduce competition in competitive residency programs: 1.94; (4) clinical skills will be more strongly considered: 2.60; and (5) new score reports provide a robust analysis of strengths and weaknesses in basic science: 2.24. Almost half (46 %) of the respondents expressed negative sentiments toward the Pass/Fail change. Reasons included more emphasis on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE, decreased motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1, and the perceived disadvantages that resulted during the residency match process.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the survey respondents, many, especially students, do not view the change as favorable. Respondents cited the primary reasons for their unfavorable perception as a lack of motivation to perform on COMLEX-USA Level 1 and the added stress of performing on COMLEX-USA Level 2CE. Additionally, respondents viewed the change as negatively impacting their audition rotations and subsequent residency competitiveness.

摘要

背景

2020年末,美国骨病医学考试委员会(NBOME)宣布,综合骨病医学执照考试(COMLEX - USA)一级将不再报告数字分数,仅提供通过/未通过的评定。美国医学考试委员会(NBME)于2020年初将美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步的核心报告改为通过/未通过。随后有报道称,住院医师项目主任在评估住院医师申请人时,越来越依赖COMLEX - USA二级临床知识考试(COMLEX - USA Level 2CE)和USMLE第二步临床知识考试(USMLE Step 2CK)的分数、医学院的声誉以及推荐信作者的地位。

目的

由美国骨病医学院协会(AACOM)的一项研究资助,柯克斯维尔骨病医学院(ATSU - KCOM)和阿肯色骨病医学院(ARCOM)提出了一系列五个假设,以调查向通过/未通过评分转变的感知影响。

方法

两个机构审查委员会(IRB)均为本研究提供了豁免地位。在这项队列研究中,通过向当前的骨病医学学生(OMS)、应届毕业生(2021级和2022级)、学术顾问以及骨病医学院(COM)课程委员会成员发放调查问卷来检验这些假设。调查过程包括两项调查:一项初始调查以收集关于所有五个假设的数据,以及一项针对性的后续调查,旨在更好地理解评分变化的影响。调查问卷基于李克特量表收集受访者的反馈。收集并分析了标准描述性统计数据。定性回答被编码为主题元素以检查回答模式。

结果

初始调查基于从1(强烈不同意)到4(强烈同意)的量表收集了302名受访者的回答(回复率为23.2%)。调查结果显示了基于4分量表(1 = 强烈不同意;2 = 不同意;3 = 同意;4 = 强烈同意)的以下项目的平均值:(1)增加进入住院医师项目匹配的机会:2.35;(2)通过/未通过是一个积极变化:2.71;(3)通过/未通过将减少竞争激烈的住院医师项目中的竞争:1.94;(4)临床技能将得到更强烈考虑:2.60;以及(5)新的分数报告对基础科学的优势和劣势进行了有力分析:2.24。几乎一半(46%)的受访者对通过/未通过的变化表达了负面情绪。原因包括更加强调COMLEX - USA Level 2CE、在COMLEX - USA一级考试中表现的动力下降以及在住院医师匹配过程中产生的感知劣势。

结论

在调查受访者中,许多人,尤其是学生,并不认为这种变化是有利的。受访者将他们负面看法的主要原因归结为在COMLEX - USA一级考试中缺乏表现的动力以及在COMLEX - USA Level 2CE考试中增加的压力。此外,受访者认为这种变化对他们的试听轮转和随后的住院医师竞争力产生了负面影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验