• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌筛查接受度和筛查意愿的患者障碍与促进因素:一项使用理论领域框架的系统评价

Patient barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening uptake and intention to screen: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

作者信息

Salman Maira, Cotton Alice, Humphrey Ada, Domun Tania, Cheng Calvin, Judah Gaby

机构信息

Imperial College London, London, UK

KCL, London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jul 21;12(1):e003127. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003127.

DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003127
PMID:40695530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12281332/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Screening high-risk individuals with low-dose CT (LDCT) reduces mortality through earlier detection, when treatment may be curable. In countries where formal screening programmes exist, uptake among eligible populations remains low. Understanding barriers to uptake could help identify interventions to support attendance.

AIM

To identify barriers and facilitators to intention to screen and uptake of LDCT as a form of lung cancer screening, from a review of existing literature.

METHOD

Three databases were used along with a grey literature search. Inclusion criteria were studied: published in English between 2001 and 2024; looking at patient-reported psychological barriers and facilitators and related to uptake (including intent to uptake) of first LDCT as method of lung cancer screening. Determinants were extracted from the papers, and whether these were reported as a barrier, facilitator or both. Determinants were then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) domains to classify determinants using a theory-based approach.

RESULTS

From an initial 2491 results, 72 papers were included (67% explored intention to screen), which reported 34 variables covering 10 TDF domains. Fear (of either lung cancer diagnosis due to fatalism (22 studies) or of screening procedure (13)), categorised in TDF domain Emotion, was the most frequently reported barrier followed by Environmental Context and Resource barriers of cost of procedure (28), inconvenience of attending (24) and lack of knowledge (24) (TDF: Knowledge). Most frequently identified facilitators were clinician recommendation (26) (TDF: Social Influence) and perceived personal benefit from attending screening (25) (TDF: Beliefs about Consequences).

CONCLUSION

To increase uptake in screening, interventions addressing these determinants should be designed and tested. These could include interventions to mitigate fear of screening, reduce the costs of attending and promote clinician endorsement.

摘要

背景

肺癌是全球癌症死亡的主要原因。对高危个体进行低剂量CT(LDCT)筛查可通过早期发现降低死亡率,此时治疗可能治愈。在存在正式筛查项目的国家,符合条件人群的参与率仍然很低。了解参与的障碍有助于确定支持参与的干预措施。

目的

通过对现有文献的综述,确定作为肺癌筛查形式的LDCT筛查意向和接受度的障碍及促进因素。

方法

使用了三个数据库并进行了灰色文献检索。研究纳入标准:2001年至2024年期间以英文发表;关注患者报告的心理障碍和促进因素以及与首次LDCT作为肺癌筛查方法的接受度(包括接受意向)相关。从论文中提取决定因素,并确定这些因素是被报告为障碍、促进因素还是两者皆有。然后将决定因素映射到理论领域框架(TDF)领域,以采用基于理论的方法对决定因素进行分类。

结果

从最初的2491个结果中,纳入了72篇论文(67%探讨了筛查意向),这些论文报告了涵盖10个TDF领域的34个变量。在TDF的“情感”领域分类的恐惧(因宿命论导致的对肺癌诊断的恐惧(22项研究)或对筛查程序的恐惧(13项研究))是最常报告的障碍,其次是“环境背景和资源”障碍中的程序成本(28项研究)、就诊不便(24项研究)和知识缺乏(24项研究)(TDF:知识)。最常确定的促进因素是临床医生的推荐(26项研究)(TDF:社会影响)和认为参加筛查有个人益处(25项研究)(TDF:对后果的信念)。

结论

为了提高筛查的参与率,应设计并测试针对这些决定因素的干预措施。这些措施可能包括减轻对筛查的恐惧、降低就诊成本以及促进临床医生认可的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a861/12281332/58434476878d/bmjresp-12-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a861/12281332/58434476878d/bmjresp-12-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a861/12281332/58434476878d/bmjresp-12-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening uptake and intention to screen: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.肺癌筛查接受度和筛查意愿的患者障碍与促进因素:一项使用理论领域框架的系统评价
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Jul 21;12(1):e003127. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-003127.
2
Understanding factors influencing the implementation of medicine risk communications by healthcare professionals in clinical practice: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework.理解影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中实施医学风险沟通的因素:使用理论领域框架进行的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):86-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations: a systematic review and economic evaluation.低剂量计算机断层扫描在高危人群中的肺癌筛查:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Nov;22(69):1-276. doi: 10.3310/hta22690.
4
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
5
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
6
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查对肺癌相关死亡率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers to Completing Low Dose Computed Tomography Scan for Lung Cancer Screening.完成低剂量计算机断层扫描进行肺癌筛查的障碍。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2024 Jul;25(5):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2024.04.014. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
2
Factors influencing the intention for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations for lung cancer.影响肺癌高危人群肺癌筛查意愿的因素。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Nov 2;11(1):100332. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100332. eCollection 2024 Jan.
3
Women's Information Needs and Educational Preferences Regarding Lung Cancer Screening.
女性对肺癌筛查的信息需求和教育偏好。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Mar;33(3):318-327. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2023.0429. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
4
Willingness to participate in combination screening for lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease in four European countries.四个欧洲国家开展肺癌、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和心血管疾病联合筛查的意愿。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):4448-4456. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10474-w. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
5
Why is the screening rate in lung cancer still low? A seven-country analysis of the factors affecting adoption.为什么肺癌筛查率仍然较低?影响采用因素的七国分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 9;11:1264342. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264342. eCollection 2023.
6
Perceptions and feelings of a French sample regarding lung cancer screening.法国人群对肺癌筛查的认知和感受。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):2333. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17110-8.
7
Access to Lung Cancer Screening Among American Indian and Alaska Native Adults: A Qualitative Study.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民成年人的肺癌筛查情况:一项定性研究。
Chest. 2024 Mar;165(3):716-724. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
8
Impact of risk perception and disease cognition on the willingness to participate in screening for lung cancer in a high-risk population.风险感知和疾病认知对高危人群参与肺癌筛查意愿的影响。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;33(2):141-151. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000843. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
9
Determinants of Willingness to Undergo Lung Cancer Screening among High-Risk Current and Ex-smokers in Sabah, Malaysia: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.马来西亚沙巴州高危现吸烟者和既往吸烟者中肺癌筛查意愿的决定因素:一项横断面试点研究
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2023 Oct;86(4):284-293. doi: 10.4046/trd.2023.0051. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
10
Public Attitudes Towards Lung Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯公众对肺癌筛查的态度:一项横断面研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Aug 14;16:2279-2289. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S418296. eCollection 2023.