Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural and Management Science, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Cancer Health Services Research, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jul;34(7):4448-4456. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10474-w. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer screening (LCS), using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), can be more efficient by simultaneously screening for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), the Big-3 diseases. This study aimed to determine the willingness to participate in (combinations of) Big-3 screening in four European countries and the relative importance of amendable participation barriers. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey aimed at (former) smokers aged 50-75 years elicited the willingness of individuals to participate in Big-3 screening and used analytical hierarchy processing (AHP) to determine the importance of participation barriers. RESULTS: Respondents were from France (n = 391), Germany (n = 338), Italy (n = 399), and the Netherlands (n = 342), and consisted of 51.2% men. The willingness to participate in screening was marginally influenced by the diseases screened for (maximum difference of 3.1%, for Big-3 screening (73.4%) vs. lung cancer and COPD screening (70.3%)) and by country (maximum difference of 3.7%, between France (68.5%) and the Netherlands (72.3%)). The largest effect on willingness to participate was personal perceived risk of lung cancer. The most important barriers were the missed cases during screening (weight 0.19) and frequency of screening (weight 0.14), while diseases screened for (weight 0.11) ranked low. CONCLUSIONS: The difference in willingness to participate in LCS showed marginal increase with inclusion of more diseases and limited variation between countries. A marginal increase in participation might result in a marginal additional benefit of Big-3 screening. The amendable participation barriers are similar to previous studies, and the new criterion, diseases screened for, is relatively unimportant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Adding diseases to combination screening modestly improves participation, driven by personal perceived risk. These findings guide program design and campaigns for lung cancer and Big-3 screening. Benefits of Big-3 screening lie in long-term health and economic impact, not participation increase. KEY POINTS: • It is unknown whether or how combination screening might affect participation. • The addition of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiovascular disease to lung cancer screening resulted in a marginal increase in willingness to participate. • The primary determinant influencing individuals' engagement in such programs is their personal perceived risk of the disease.
目的:通过同时筛查慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和心血管疾病(CVD)这三大疾病,肺癌筛查(LCS)可以更有效率地使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)。本研究旨在确定在四个欧洲国家参与(组合)三大疾病筛查的意愿,以及可改变的参与障碍的相对重要性。
方法:一项针对 50-75 岁前吸烟者的在线横断面调查,旨在了解个人参与三大疾病筛查的意愿,并使用层次分析法(AHP)来确定参与障碍的重要性。
结果:受访者分别来自法国(n=391)、德国(n=338)、意大利(n=399)和荷兰(n=342),其中 51.2%为男性。对筛查的疾病的筛查(最大差异为 3.1%,三大疾病筛查(73.4%)与肺癌和 COPD 筛查(70.3%))和国家(最大差异为 3.7%,法国(68.5%)和荷兰(72.3%))稍有影响参与意愿。对参与意愿影响最大的是个人对肺癌的风险感知。最重要的障碍是筛查期间漏诊的病例(权重 0.19)和筛查频率(权重 0.14),而筛查的疾病(权重 0.11)则排名较低。
结论:随着纳入疾病数量的增加,参与 LCS 的意愿略有增加,且国家之间的差异有限。参与率的适度增加可能会带来三大疾病筛查的适度额外收益。可改变的参与障碍与之前的研究相似,而新的标准,即筛查的疾病,相对不重要。
临床意义:将疾病纳入联合筛查可以适度提高参与度,这是由个人感知到的风险驱动的。这些发现为肺癌和三大疾病筛查计划的设计和宣传提供了指导。三大疾病筛查的收益在于长期的健康和经济影响,而不是参与率的提高。
关键点:
Cancer Res Treat. 2017-11-16
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024
Front Oncol. 2022-1-10
Lancet Respir Med. 2021-9
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021-5
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021-6
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2021-11-1