Quan Xiaoyan, Xiong Huarong, Liu Xiaoyu, Song Pan, Wang Dan, Chen Qin, Hu Xiaoli, Shi Meihong
Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Nursing School, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 22;15(1):26661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10459-3.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects approximately 236.62 million individuals globally, exposing them to significantly increased risks of major limb events such as death and amputation. Concurrently, the number of diagnostic prediction models for PAD patients is steadily rising; however, these studies exhibit varying results, and their quality and applicability in clinical practice and future research remain unclear. To systematically assess the methodological quality of studies on PAD diagnostic prediction models. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched to identify studies which aiming to develop or validate a diagnostic prediction model of PAD. The retrieval time limit is from the establishment of the database to June 1, 2025. Two researchers independently screened and extracted data from eligible studies and evaluated the risk of bias using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). A total of 24 studies on PAD diagnostic prediction models were included, most of which exhibited high risk of bias, predominantly in the domains of study population and statistical analysis. The meta-analyzed Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) was 0.79 [0.74, 0.84], indicating favorable model performance. The reported number of predictor variables ranged from 2 to 20, with common predictors including age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and BMI. This study demonstrates that PAD diagnostic prediction models exhibit good predictive performance, albeit accompanied by a high risk of bias and substantial heterogeneity across studies. Future research on modeling should emphasize comprehensive methodological enhancements in model design, construction, evaluation, and validation, with full disclosure of crucial model information. It should also utilize network computing for presenting model outcomes and conduct large-scale, multi-center external validation of existing models to promote their clinical application.Trial registration: This study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024557144).
外周动脉疾病(PAD)全球约影响2.3662亿人,使他们面临肢体重大事件(如死亡和截肢)的风险显著增加。与此同时,针对PAD患者的诊断预测模型数量在稳步上升;然而,这些研究结果各异,其在临床实践和未来研究中的质量及适用性仍不明确。为系统评估PAD诊断预测模型研究的方法学质量,检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane系统评价数据库,以识别旨在开发或验证PAD诊断预测模型的研究。检索时间限制为从数据库建立至2025年6月1日。两名研究人员独立筛选并从符合条件的研究中提取数据,并使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)评估偏倚风险。共纳入24项关于PAD诊断预测模型的研究,其中大多数存在高偏倚风险,主要在研究人群和统计分析领域。经荟萃分析的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.79[0.74, 0.84],表明模型性能良好。报告的预测变量数量从2到20不等,常见预测因素包括年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病、吸烟和体重指数。本研究表明,PAD诊断预测模型虽具有良好的预测性能,但同时存在高偏倚风险且各研究间存在大量异质性。未来的模型研究应强调在模型设计、构建、评估和验证方面全面改进方法学,并充分披露关键模型信息。还应利用网络计算呈现模型结果,并对现有模型进行大规模、多中心外部验证,以促进其临床应用。试验注册:本研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD42024557144)