• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结肠切除术中体内重叠吻合时吻合器与手工缝合肠切开术闭合的比较:体外研究

Stapled versus handsewn closure of enterotomy for intracorporeal overlap anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy: in vitro study.

作者信息

Ishizaki Tetsuo, Mazaki Junichi, Kasahara Kenta, Udo Ryutaro, Tago Tomoya, Nagakawa Yuichi

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.

出版信息

Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 22;29(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03190-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10151-025-03190-8
PMID:40696078
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In laparoscopic colectomy, overlap anastomosis (OA) is the most standard method of intracorporeal anastomosis. To avoid narrowing the anastomotic area, the closure of the enterotomy is often performed with handsewn running sutures of the monofilament. The purpose of this study was to compare two porcine in vitro colon models of stapled versus handsewn closure of enterotomy in intracorporeal OA.

METHODS

In total, 40 porcine in vitro colon OA models (20 cases in the stapled closure, SC group, in which the enterotomy was closed with a stapler, and 20 cases in the handsewn closure with monofilament, HC group) were created, and anastomotic area with maximum intensity projection-computed tomography, anastomotic time, and leakage pressure were measured.

RESULTS

In the anastomotic area, there was no significant difference between in the SC group and HC group (474.0 ± 105.0 mm versus 502.6 ± 155.6 mm, p = 0.552). The anastomotic time was significantly shorter in the SC group than in the HC group (185.9 ± 38.3 s versus 292.4 ± 67.8 s, p < 0.001). The leakage pressure was significantly higher in the SC group than in the HC group (30.1 ± 3.8 mmHg versus 21.6 ± 5.3 mmHg, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study using porcine in vitro colon model showed that, in OA, the anastomotic area was similar, anastomotic time was significantly shorter, and leakage pressure was significantly higher in SC compared with HC. The results suggest that SC may be superior to HC when performing intracorporeal OA in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

摘要

背景

在腹腔镜结肠切除术中,重叠吻合术(OA)是最标准的体内吻合方法。为避免吻合口面积变窄,肠切开术的关闭通常采用单丝手工连续缝合。本研究的目的是比较两种猪体外结肠模型在体内OA中使用吻合器与手工缝合关闭肠切开术的效果。

方法

总共创建了40个猪体外结肠OA模型(吻合器关闭组20例,即SC组,用吻合器关闭肠切开术;单丝手工缝合关闭组20例,即HC组),并测量了最大强度投影计算机断层扫描的吻合口面积、吻合时间和渗漏压力。

结果

在吻合口面积方面,SC组和HC组之间无显著差异(474.0±105.0平方毫米对502.6±155.6平方毫米,p = 0.552)。SC组的吻合时间明显短于HC组(185.9±38.3秒对292.4±67.8秒,p < 0.001)。SC组的渗漏压力明显高于HC组(30.1±3.8毫米汞柱对21.6±5.3毫米汞柱,p < 0.001)。

结论

本研究使用猪体外结肠模型的结果表明,在OA中,SC组与HC组相比,吻合口面积相似,吻合时间明显更短,渗漏压力明显更高。结果表明,在腹腔镜结肠癌手术中进行体内OA时,SC可能优于HC。

相似文献

1
Stapled versus handsewn closure of enterotomy for intracorporeal overlap anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy: in vitro study.腹腔镜结肠切除术中体内重叠吻合时吻合器与手工缝合肠切开术闭合的比较:体外研究
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jul 22;29(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03190-8.
2
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.结直肠吻合手术中吻合器与手工缝合方法的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;2012(2):CD003144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003144.pub2.
3
Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.回结肠吻合术的吻合器与手工缝合方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7(9):CD004320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub3.
4
The impact of stapled compared to handsewn repair on anastomotic outcomes in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.吻合器缝合与手工缝合修复对创伤患者吻合口结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Apr;94(4):604-613. doi: 10.1111/ans.18925. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
5
Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses.回结肠吻合术的吻合器与手工缝合方法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18(3):CD004320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004320.pub2.
6
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery.结直肠吻合手术中吻合器与手工缝合方法的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003144.
7
A sutureless overlapped anastomosis technique using linear staplers with reinforced bioabsorbable material in robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.机器人右半结肠切除术的腔内吻合中使用带有增强型可吸收材料的线性吻合器进行无缝合重叠吻合技术。
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr;26(4):754-759. doi: 10.1111/codi.16880. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
8
Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.手工缝合与吻合器用于闭合袢式回肠造口术——一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1265-8. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
9
Type of anastomosis and risk of anastomotic insufficiency after oesophagectomy: a bi-national population-based cohort study.食管癌切除术后吻合方式与吻合口漏风险:一项基于两国人群的队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;51(8):110107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110107. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
10
A comparative analysis of staple height used for robotic right colectomy.用于机器人辅助右半结肠切除术的吻合钉高度的比较分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 26;19(1):327. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02503-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning Curve of Intracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Side Colon Cancer: A Cumulative Sum Analysis.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中腔内心脏吻合学习曲线:累积和分析。
Anticancer Res. 2023 Jul;43(7):3341-3348. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.16510.
2
Early outcomes from the Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis study (MIRCAST).微创右结肠吻合术研究(MIRCAST)的早期结果。
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1153-1160. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad077.
3
Intracorporeal delta-shaped anastomosis without suturing technique in laparoscopic colectomy using a linear stapling device with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid sheet.
使用带有生物可吸收聚乙醇酸片的线性吻合器在腹腔镜结肠切除术中进行无需缝合技术的体内三角形吻合术
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jul;26(7):593-594. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02572-6. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
4
Intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic-assisted and laparoscopic right colectomy: short-term outcomes of a multi-center prospective trial.机器人辅助和腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的腔内和腔外吻合:多中心前瞻性试验的短期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4349-4358. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08780-9. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Infection Risk Between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中经体内与体外吻合比较腹腔感染风险:单中心回顾性研究。
Am Surg. 2021 Mar;87(3):341-346. doi: 10.1177/0003134820950291. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
6
A new intracorporeal suture-less stapled end-to-end anastomosis in laparoscopic left-colectomy for colon cancer - a video vignette.一种用于结肠癌腹腔镜左半结肠切除术的新型体内免缝合吻合器端端吻合术——视频简述
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;22(11):1803-1804. doi: 10.1111/codi.15232. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial).随机对照临床试验:腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的腔内吻合与腔外吻合比较(IEA 试验)。
Br J Surg. 2020 Mar;107(4):364-372. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11389. Epub 2019 Dec 17.
8
Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜右半结肠切除术后行肠内吻合或肠外吻合:一项双盲随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Nov;270(5):762-767. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003519.
9
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Does advancement in stapling technology with triple-row and enhanced staple configurations confer additional safety? A matched comparison of 340 stapled ileocolic anastomoses.吻合技术的进步,如采用三排钉和增强型吻合钉,是否能提供额外的安全性?340 例吻合的回肠结肠吻合术的匹配比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3122-3130. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6027-1. Epub 2018 Jan 16.