• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由同伴主导的“诚实、开放、自豪”项目,旨在减少德国军人中精神疾病污名化的影响:随机对照试验。

The peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program to decrease the impact of mental illness stigma among German military personnel: randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Rüsch Nicolas, Helms Christian, Hörger Jana, Höhle Burkhard, Bernert Hendryk, Muschner Patric, Rose Carolyn, Corrigan Patrick W, Mulfinger Nadine, Zimmermann Peter, Willmund Gerd-Dieter

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University and BKH Günzburg, Ulm/Günzburg, Germany.

Center for Military Mental Health, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02960-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-025-02960-x
PMID:40696200
Abstract

PURPOSE

Due to widespread stigma in the military, many military servicemembers with mental illness struggle with discrimination, self-stigma and decisions whether to disclose their condition. This study had the aim to evaluate the efficacy of Honest, Open, Proud (HOP), a four-session peer-led group program adapted to support military personnel with disclosure decisions and to reduce stigma's impact, in the German military.

METHODS

Ninety-nine active servicemembers with mental illness were randomized to HOP and treatment as usual (TAU) or to TAU alone. The two primary endpoints were stigma stress three weeks after baseline (T1/after HOP for HOP participants) and psychological quality of life six weeks after baseline (T2/after the HOP booster session). This randomized-controlled trial was registered before recruitment onset at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03218748).

RESULTS

Compared to the control group, stigma stress decreased significantly among HOP participants at T1 (d = 0.64), while there was no significant effect of HOP on psychological quality of life at T2. HOP had significant positive effects on secondary outcomes at T2: overall quality of life, self-stigma, depressive symptoms, empowerment, well-being, attitudes to disclosure and to help-seeking, and secrecy. Reductions in stigma stress, secrecy, and marginally in overall quality of life (p = 0.055), remained significant twelve weeks after baseline (T3).

CONCLUSION

This trial provides initial evidence that HOP for active military servicemembers is feasible and effective in terms of stigma stress, disclosure decisions, depressive symptoms, quality of life and well-being. HOP may be a valuable addition to mental health services and peer support in the military.

摘要

目的

由于军队中普遍存在的污名化现象,许多患有精神疾病的军人面临歧视、自我污名化以及是否披露病情的抉择困境。本研究旨在评估“诚实、开放、自豪”(HOP)项目的效果,这是一个由同伴主导的四阶段团体项目,旨在帮助德国军队中的军人做出披露病情的决定,并减少污名化的影响。

方法

99名患有精神疾病的现役军人被随机分为HOP组和常规治疗组(TAU),或者仅纳入常规治疗组。两个主要终点分别是基线后三周的污名压力(T1/HOP参与者在HOP项目结束后)以及基线后六周的心理生活质量(T2/HOP强化课程结束后)。这项随机对照试验在招募开始前已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册(NCT03218748)。

结果

与对照组相比,HOP参与者在T1时的污名压力显著降低(d = 0.64),而HOP在T2时对心理生活质量没有显著影响。HOP在T2时对次要结局有显著的积极影响:总体生活质量、自我污名化、抑郁症状、赋权、幸福感、对披露和寻求帮助的态度以及保密情况。在基线后十二周(T3),污名压力、保密情况以及总体生活质量的轻微下降(p = 0.055)仍然显著。

结论

本试验提供了初步证据,表明针对现役军人的HOP项目在污名压力、披露决定、抑郁症状、生活质量和幸福感方面是可行且有效的。HOP可能是军队心理健康服务和同伴支持的一项有价值的补充。

相似文献

1
The peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program to decrease the impact of mental illness stigma among German military personnel: randomized controlled trial.由同伴主导的“诚实、开放、自豪”项目,旨在减少德国军人中精神疾病污名化的影响:随机对照试验。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02960-x.
2
Honest, Open, Proud for adolescents with mental illness: pilot randomized controlled trial.诚实、开放、自豪:青少年精神病患者的试点随机对照试验。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59(6):684-691. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12853. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
3
Pre-deployment programmes for building resilience in military and frontline emergency service personnel.军事和一线应急服务人员的韧性建设部署前方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 6;12(12):CD013242. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013242.pub2.
4
Pramipexole in addition to mood stabilisers for treatment-resistant bipolar depression: the PAX-BD randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.普拉克索联合心境稳定剂治疗难治性双相抑郁:PAX - BD随机双盲安慰剂对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(21):1-216. doi: 10.3310/HBFC1953.
5
A feasibility randomized controlled trial of an individually delivered, peer support intervention to reduce the impact of psychosis stigma and discrimination for people with psychosis: the let's talk study.一项关于个体化提供的同伴支持干预措施以减轻精神病耻辱感和歧视对精神病患者影响的可行性随机对照试验:“畅所欲言”研究。
Psychol Med. 2024 Dec 27;54(16):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724002605.
6
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
7
Comprehensive care programmes for children with medical complexity.针对患有复杂疾病儿童的综合护理方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;5(5):CD013329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013329.pub2.
8
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
The impact of biological interventions for ulcerative colitis on health-related quality of life.溃疡性结肠炎生物干预措施对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 22;2015(9):CD008655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008655.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
The Lancet Commission on ending stigma and discrimination in mental health.柳叶刀心理健康消除耻辱和歧视委员会
Lancet. 2022 Oct 22;400(10361):1438-1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01470-2. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
2
Prevalence of common mental health disorders in military veterans: using primary healthcare data.退役军人常见心理健康障碍的流行情况:利用初级保健医疗数据。
BMJ Mil Health. 2023 Nov 22;169(6):523-528. doi: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002045.
3
The global prevalence of depression, suicide ideation, and attempts in the military forces: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of cross sectional studies.
全球军事部队中抑郁、自杀意念和尝试的流行率:横断面研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 15;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03526-2.
4
Attitudes towards disclosing a mental illness among German soldiers and their comrades.德国士兵及其战友对披露精神疾病的态度。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Dec;258:200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
Mental health stigma and barriers to mental health care for first responders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.精神卫生污名和对急救人员精神卫生保健的障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Nov;94:218-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
6
Stigma-related barriers and facilitators to help seeking for mental health issues in the armed forces: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature.与耻辱感相关的阻碍和促进因素会影响军人寻求心理健康问题的帮助:定性文献的系统评价和主题综合分析。
Psychol Med. 2017 Aug;47(11):1880-1892. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000356. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
7
Prevalence and severity of mental disorders in military personnel: a standardised comparison with civilians.军人的精神障碍患病率和严重程度:与平民的标准化比较。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Apr;26(2):199-208. doi: 10.1017/S204579601600024X. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Stigma as a barrier to seeking health care among military personnel with mental health problems.污名化是心理健康问题军人寻求医疗保健的障碍。
Epidemiol Rev. 2015;37:144-62. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxu012. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
9
Brief version of the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness (ISMI) scale: psychometric properties and relationship to depression, self esteem, recovery orientation, empowerment, and perceived devaluation and discrimination.精神疾病内化耻辱感(ISMI)量表简版:心理测量特性及其与抑郁、自尊、康复取向、赋权以及感知到的贬低和歧视的关系
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Mar;37(1):17-23. doi: 10.1037/prj0000035.
10
What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.与心理健康相关的污名对寻求帮助有何影响?对定量和定性研究的系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):11-27. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000129. Epub 2014 Feb 26.