文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期，新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

单次400赫兹经颅脉冲电流刺激对皮质脊髓和皮质皮质兴奋性及手部灵活性的影响：一项双盲随机对照试验

Effects of a Single Session 400 Hz Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Corticospinal and Corticocortical Excitability and Hand Dexterity: A Double-Blind RCT.

作者信息

Jaberzadeh Shapour, Malekahmad Mona, Liu Renming, Zoghi Maryam

机构信息

Monash Neuromodulation Research Unit, Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Discipline of Physiotherapy, Federation University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2025 Jul;62(7):e70112. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70112.

DOI:10.1111/psyp.70112
PMID:40696723
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12284344/
Abstract

The effects of 400 Hz anodal and cathodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation of the primary motor cortex (400 Hz a-tPCS, 400 Hz c-tPCS) on corticospinal excitability (CSE) and corticocortical excitability (CCE) and hand dexterity remain underexplored. This study examined the effects of a single session of 400 Hz a-tPCS, 400 Hz c-tPCS, and sham stimulation on CSE, CCE, and hand dexterity, providing insights for potential clinical applications in motor deficits. In this double-blinded, randomized, counterbalanced crossover trial, 26 healthy young adults completed three experimental sessions: 400 Hz a-tPCS, 400 Hz c-tPCS, and sham stimulation, spaced 48 h apart. Transcranial magnetic stimulation assessed CSE and CCE, while the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) evaluated hand dexterity. The results showed polarity-specific effects. A single session of 400 Hz a-tPCS significantly increased CSE and improved hand dexterity, evidenced by faster PPT completion times (p < 0.05). Conversely, 400 Hz c-tPCS reduced CSE but did not influence PPT performance (p > 0.05). Sham stimulation showed no significant changes. These findings suggest that 400 Hz a-tPCS enhances motor excitability and dexterity, while 400 Hz c-tPCS selectively reduces CSE. This study lays a foundation for exploring high-frequency tPCS in clinical motor rehabilitation.

摘要

400赫兹阳极和阴极经颅脉冲电流刺激初级运动皮层（400赫兹阳极经颅脉冲电流刺激、400赫兹阴极经颅脉冲电流刺激）对皮质脊髓兴奋性（CSE）、皮质皮质兴奋性（CCE）和手部灵活性的影响仍未得到充分研究。本研究考察了单次400赫兹阳极经颅脉冲电流刺激、400赫兹阴极经颅脉冲电流刺激和假刺激对CSE、CCE和手部灵活性的影响，为运动功能障碍的潜在临床应用提供见解。在这项双盲、随机、平衡交叉试验中，26名健康年轻成年人完成了三个实验阶段：400赫兹阳极经颅脉冲电流刺激、400赫兹阴极经颅脉冲电流刺激和假刺激，间隔48小时。经颅磁刺激评估CSE和CCE，而普渡钉板试验（PPT）评估手部灵活性。结果显示出极性特异性效应。单次400赫兹阳极经颅脉冲电流刺激显著提高了CSE并改善了手部灵活性，PPT完成时间更快证明了这一点（p<0.05）。相反，400赫兹阴极经颅脉冲电流刺激降低了CSE，但未影响PPT表现（p>0.05）。假刺激没有显著变化。这些发现表明，400赫兹阳极经颅脉冲电流刺激可增强运动兴奋性和灵活性，而400赫兹阴极经颅脉冲电流刺激可选择性降低CSE。本研究为在临床运动康复中探索高频经颅脉冲电流刺激奠定了基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/1c1203692150/PSYP-62-e70112-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/4a9a92a91598/PSYP-62-e70112-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/9fbe936b762d/PSYP-62-e70112-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/26bb72a65015/PSYP-62-e70112-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/c82584a0b06e/PSYP-62-e70112-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/3ce4201db5e7/PSYP-62-e70112-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/1c1203692150/PSYP-62-e70112-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/4a9a92a91598/PSYP-62-e70112-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/9fbe936b762d/PSYP-62-e70112-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/26bb72a65015/PSYP-62-e70112-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/c82584a0b06e/PSYP-62-e70112-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/3ce4201db5e7/PSYP-62-e70112-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/962e/12284344/1c1203692150/PSYP-62-e70112-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Effects of a Single Session 400 Hz Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Corticospinal and Corticocortical Excitability and Hand Dexterity: A Double-Blind RCT.

Psychophysiology. 2025-7

[2]
Investigating the Effects of Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation at Low Frequencies (0.5 to 5 Hz) on Corticospinal and Corticocortical Excitability.

Psychophysiology. 2025-6

[3]
Does transcranial electrical stimulation enhance corticospinal excitability of the motor cortex in healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Neurosci. 2017-8-2

[4]
The Effects of Monophasic Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Performance in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Double-Blinded Sham-Controlled Study.

Brain Connect. 2022-4

[5]
The effects of a single-session cathodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation on corticospinal excitability: A randomized sham-controlled double-blinded study.

Eur J Neurosci. 2020-12

[6]
Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rev Neurosci. 2018-2-23

[7]
Effects of EEG-guided transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) of the cerebellum on motor behavior and electrophysiological activity.

Neuroimage. 2025-8-15

[8]
Effects of short-term dual action-simulation training combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation on corticospinal excitation and finger motor performance.

J Neurophysiol. 2025-7-1

[9]
Spinal cord ultrasound stimulation modulates corticospinal excitability in humans.

Brain Stimul. 2025

[10]
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex on short-term balance acquisition in healthy individuals.

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025-7-4

本文引用的文献

[1]
Transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A scoping review of the current literature on scope, nature, underlying mechanisms, and gaps.

Psychophysiology. 2024-3

[2]
Exploring sensory, motor, and pain responses as potential side or therapeutic effects of sub-2 mA, 400 Hz transcranial pulsed current stimulation.

PLoS One. 2023

[3]
Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition and the Cortical Silent Period in Youth.

Biomedicines. 2023-1-30

[4]
Local neuronal excitation and global inhibition during epileptic fast ripples in humans.

Brain. 2023-2-13

[5]
The effects of concurrent bilateral anodal tDCS of primary motor cortex and cerebellum on corticospinal excitability: a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study.

Brain Struct Funct. 2022-9

[6]
Cortical excitatory and inhibitory correlates of the fronto-limbic circuit in major depression and differential effects of left frontal brain stimulation in a randomized sham-controlled trial.

J Affect Disord. 2022-8-15

[7]
The Effects of Monophasic Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Performance in Healthy Young Adults: A Randomized Double-Blinded Sham-Controlled Study.

Brain Connect. 2022-4

[8]
The effects of a single-session cathodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation on corticospinal excitability: A randomized sham-controlled double-blinded study.

Eur J Neurosci. 2020-12

[9]
The Effect of Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation at 4 and 75 Hz on Electroencephalography Theta and High Gamma Band Power: A Pilot Study.

Brain Connect. 2020-11

[10]
Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS): a wide range of frequencies is needed for increasing cortical excitability.

Sci Rep. 2019-10-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索