Isaeva Anastasia S, Trujillo Yeriomenko Adriana D, Idota Esther, Volodina Sofya I, Porozova Natalia O, Bezsonov Evgeny E, Malogolovkin Alexander S
Molecular Virology laboratory, First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 8;15:1540397. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1540397. eCollection 2025.
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have the ability to efficiently enter, replicate within, and destroy cancer cells. This capacity to selectively target cancer cells while inducing long-term anti-tumor immune responses, makes OVs a promising tool for next-generation cancer therapy. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) induced by OVs initiates the cancer-immunity cycle (CIC) and plays a critical role in activating and reshaping anti-cancer immunity. Genetic engineering, including arming OVs with cancer cell-specific binders and immunostimulatory molecules, further enhances immune responses at various stages of the CIC, improving the specificity and safety of virotherapy.The aim of this study is to update current knowledge in immunotherapy using OVs and to highlight the remarkable plasticity of viruses in shaping the tumor immune microenvironment, which may facilitate anti-cancer treatment through various approaches.
Research articles, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews were retrieved from PubMed, using the search terms ('Oncolytics' OR 'Immunotherapy' OR 'Virotherapy' OR 'Viral vector') AND 'gene therapy', without language restrictions.
In this review, we discuss current strategies aimed at increasing the tumor specificity of OVs and improving their safety. We summarize and functionally categorize different biochemical approaches, with a focus on virus engineering and advancements in immunotherapy. Transduction targeting methods (e.g., xenotype switching, pseudotyping, cell receptor targeting) and non-transduction modifications (e.g., miRNA, optogenetics, transcriptional targeting) are critically reviewed. We also examine the mechanisms of ICD and viral modifications that contribute to efficient cancer cell death and modulation of cancer-specific immunity. Finally, we provide an outlook on promising future oncolytics and approaches with potential therapeutic benefit for the next generation of cancer immunotherapy.
Immunogenic cell death induced by oncolytic viruses is a key mediator of potent anti-cancer immunity. The genetic integration of immunostimulatory molecules as regulatory elements into OV genomes significantly enhances their therapeutic potential, safety, and stability. Additionally, therapeutic potency can be further increased by deleting viral genes that inhibit apoptosis, thereby enhancing ICD. However, the synergistic effects of these modifications may vary significantly depending on the cancer type.
溶瘤病毒(OVs)能够有效进入癌细胞、在癌细胞内复制并破坏癌细胞。这种选择性靶向癌细胞同时诱导长期抗肿瘤免疫反应的能力,使溶瘤病毒成为下一代癌症治疗的有前景的工具。溶瘤病毒诱导的免疫原性细胞死亡(ICD)启动癌症-免疫循环(CIC),并在激活和重塑抗癌免疫中起关键作用。基因工程,包括用癌细胞特异性结合物和免疫刺激分子武装溶瘤病毒,进一步增强了CIC各个阶段的免疫反应,提高了病毒疗法的特异性和安全性。本研究的目的是更新目前关于使用溶瘤病毒进行免疫治疗的知识,并强调病毒在塑造肿瘤免疫微环境方面的显著可塑性,这可能通过各种方法促进抗癌治疗。
从PubMed检索研究文章、荟萃分析和系统评价,使用检索词(“溶瘤剂”或“免疫治疗”或“病毒疗法”或“病毒载体”)和“基因治疗”,无语言限制。
在本综述中,我们讨论了旨在提高溶瘤病毒的肿瘤特异性和改善其安全性的当前策略。我们总结并按功能对不同的生化方法进行分类,重点是病毒工程和免疫治疗的进展。对转导靶向方法(如异型转换、假型化、细胞受体靶向)和非转导修饰(如微小RNA、光遗传学、转录靶向)进行了批判性综述。我们还研究了ICD的机制以及有助于有效癌细胞死亡和调节癌症特异性免疫的病毒修饰。最后,我们对有前景的未来溶瘤剂以及对下一代癌症免疫治疗具有潜在治疗益处的方法进行了展望。
溶瘤病毒诱导的免疫原性细胞死亡是强效抗癌免疫的关键介质。将免疫刺激分子作为调控元件基因整合到溶瘤病毒基因组中可显著提高其治疗潜力、安全性和稳定性。此外,通过删除抑制细胞凋亡的病毒基因可进一步提高治疗效力,从而增强ICD。然而,这些修饰的协同效应可能因癌症类型而异。