• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士在电子健康记录中应用改良版PEN-FAST临床决策规则的实施与效果

Implementation and performance of a nurse administered modified PEN-FAST clinical decision rule in the electronic health record.

作者信息

Hoffmann Wesley J, Patel Shivani, Lee Elizabeth J, Finch Natalie A, Su Christy P, Teran Nicole A, Huang Yao-Hsuan, Shehadeh Fadi, Alsafadi Muhammad Yasser

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist The Woodlands, Conroe, TX, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 18;5(1):e159. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10066. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.10066
PMID:40697885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12281231/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate performance of registered nurse assessments of the PEN-FAST penicillin allergy clinical decision rule compared to antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists.

DESIGN

Prospective, blinded, non-interventional, quality assurance study.

SETTING

This study took place across 4 inpatient hospitals within a large health system in Houston, Texas.

METHODS

We implemented PEN-FAST rule questions into the electronic health record (EHR) for registered nurses to perform. Patients were randomly selected in a prospective fashion, with nurse documented scores hidden, for re-assessment by antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists to compare risk stratification and scores.

RESULTS

Overall agreement of high risk and low risk results was 84.3%. Registered nurse evaluations with the PEN-FAST clinical decision rule for detecting a high-risk patient demonstrated a sensitivity of 67%, specificity of 89.8%, positive predictive value of 67.9%, and negative predictive value of 89.5%. Additionally, 34.4% of patients with a documented penicillin allergy admitted to tolerating amoxicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanate since their last recalled reaction to penicillin.

CONCLUSIONS

Registered nurse assessment of the PEN-FAST clinical decision rule demonstrated good performance and can effectively be used to screen for low-risk penicillin allergy patients. Incorporation of the PEN-FAST rule into EHR can be scaled into large health systems to help appropriately stratify patients with low- and high-risk penicillin allergies and improve documentation.

摘要

目的

评估注册护士运用PEN-FAST青霉素过敏临床决策规则的评估表现,并与抗菌药物管理药师的评估表现进行比较。

设计

前瞻性、盲法、非干预性质量保证研究。

地点

本研究在得克萨斯州休斯顿一个大型医疗系统的4家住院医院开展。

方法

我们将PEN-FAST规则问题纳入电子健康记录(EHR),由注册护士进行操作。以前瞻性方式随机选择患者,隐藏护士记录的分数,由抗菌药物管理药师重新评估,以比较风险分层和分数。

结果

高风险和低风险结果的总体一致性为84.3%。注册护士运用PEN-FAST临床决策规则检测高风险患者的评估显示,敏感性为67%,特异性为89.8%,阳性预测值为67.9%,阴性预测值为89.5%。此外,34.4%记录有青霉素过敏的患者自上次回忆起青霉素反应后,承认能耐受阿莫西林或阿莫西林/克拉维酸。

结论

注册护士对PEN-FAST临床决策规则的评估表现良好,可有效用于筛查低风险青霉素过敏患者。将PEN-FAST规则纳入电子健康记录可推广至大型医疗系统,以帮助对低风险和高风险青霉素过敏患者进行适当分层,并改善记录。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a396/12281231/603ce17a2def/S2732494X25100661_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a396/12281231/603ce17a2def/S2732494X25100661_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a396/12281231/603ce17a2def/S2732494X25100661_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation and performance of a nurse administered modified PEN-FAST clinical decision rule in the electronic health record.护士在电子健康记录中应用改良版PEN-FAST临床决策规则的实施与效果
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 18;5(1):e159. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10066. eCollection 2025.
2
PEN-FAST in pediatrics: a reliable tool for penicillin allergy assessment?儿科中的PEN-FAST:评估青霉素过敏的可靠工具?
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jul 2;184(7):463. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06305-3.
3
Evaluation of the PEN-FAST clinical decision rule in non-beta-lactam antibiotic allergy assessment.PEN-FAST临床决策规则在非β-内酰胺类抗生素过敏评估中的应用评价
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.019.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study.PECARN 预测规则在儿童因钝器伤就诊于急诊时的颈椎成像:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Jul;8(7):482-490. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(24)00104-4. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
6
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
7
Evaluation of drug provocation tests without prior skin testing in children with suspected penicillin allergy and correlation with PEN-FAST: A single-center study.疑似青霉素过敏儿童未经预先皮肤试验的药物激发试验评估及与PEN-FAST的相关性:一项单中心研究
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jul 17;184(8):488. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06301-7.
8
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
9
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.不同的抗生素治疗方案用于治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub6.
10
The Pragmatic Removal of Penicillin Allergy Electronic Health Record Labels (PROPEL) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.青霉素过敏电子健康记录标签实用去除(PROPEL)试验:一项随机临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2025.07.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurse-Initiated Improvement for Documentation of Penicillin Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Urgent Care Clinics.护士主导的儿科急诊诊所青霉素药物不良反应记录改进措施
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;12(8):1087. doi: 10.3390/children12081087.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial.临床决策规则在低风险青霉素过敏患者中直接口服激发试验的疗效:PALACE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;183(9):944-952. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2986.
2
Impact of an inpatient nurse-initiated penicillin allergy delabeling questionnaire.住院护士发起的青霉素过敏标签去除调查问卷的影响
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;2(1):e86. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.55. eCollection 2022.
3
Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update.
药物过敏:2022年实践参数更新
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1333-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
4
Geographical distribution of allergy/immunology providers in the United States and association with median income.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Sep;8(8):2802-2804.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
5
Development and Validation of a Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule.开发和验证青霉素过敏临床决策规则。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):745-752. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403.
6
Antibiotic allergy.抗生素过敏。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 12;393(10167):183-198. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32218-9. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
7
The Cost of Penicillin Allergy Evaluation.青霉素过敏评估的成本。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May-Jun;6(3):1019-1027.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Frequency of self-reported drug allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression.自我报告的药物过敏频率:一项采用Meta回归的系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Oct;119(4):362-373.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
9
Penicillin Allergy Is Not Necessarily Forever.青霉素过敏不一定会持续终生。
JAMA. 2017 Jul 4;318(1):82-83. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.6510.
10
Prospective evaluation of electronic medical record penicillin allergy documentation at a tertiary community teaching hospital.在一家三级社区教学医院对电子病历青霉素过敏记录进行前瞻性评估。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Jul;119(1):94-95. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 31.