Biederstädt Alexander, Bassermann Florian, Hecker Judith S
Department of Medicine III, Technical University of Munich (TUM), School of Medicine and Health, Munich, Germany.
TranslaTUM, Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 8;16:1585556. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1585556. eCollection 2025.
INTRODUCTION: Relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) remains a difficult-to-treat disease with limited treatment options and high unmet clinical need, necessitating the development of new therapies with greater potency and broader applicability. While autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapies have transformed the treatment landscape, 60-65% of patients receiving these therapies eventually relapse, underscoring the need for improved approaches. Allogeneic CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies have recently emerged as promising alternatives, offering the potential to shorten manufacturing times, reduce costs, and expand access to a broader patient population. This systematic review and meta-analysis compiles the currently available clinical trial data on the efficacy and safety of these novel therapies in adult patients with r/r LBCL. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted for studies published up to January 12, 2025, involving allogeneic CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies in R/R LBCL. The primary outcomes assessed were the best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) at any time point. Secondary outcomes included rates of grade 1-2 and grade 3+ cytokine release syndrome (CRS), grade 1-2 and grade 3+ immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), grade 1-2 and grade 3+ infections and incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, encompassing 334 patients (155 CAR-NK; 179 CAR-T) evaluable for safety and 235 patients evaluable for response (77 CAR-NK; 158 CAR-T). The pooled estimates for the best overall response rate (bORR) and the best complete response rate (bCRR) were 52.5% [95% CI, 41.0-63.9] and 32.8% [95% CI, 24.2-42.0], respectively. Safety analysis revealed very low incidences of grade 3+ CRS (0.04% [95% CI 0.00-0.49]) or grade 3+ ICANS (0.64% [95% CI 0.01-2.23]) and only one occurrence of a GvH-like reaction across 334 infused patients enrolled in the included studies, highlighting the remarkable safety profile of CAR-engineered "off-the-shelf" allogeneic approaches. The estimated overall incidence of low-grade CRS was 30% [95% CI, 14-48], while the estimated overall incidence of low-grade ICANS was 1% [95% CI, 0%-4%], markedly lower than current-generation autologous CAR-T cell products. The incidence of low-grade and severe infections was 25% [95% CI 14-36%) (n=252) and 7% [95% CI 2-14%] (n=291), respectively. DISCUSSION: Together, allogeneic CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies demonstrate encouraging efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with r/r LBCL. Coupled with their favorable safety profiles and the potential for off-the-shelf availability, allogeneic cell therapies hold great promise to broaden the reach of live cell-based treatments, delivering impactful results to a wider patient population in the coming years.
引言:复发/难治性(r/r)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)仍然是一种难以治疗的疾病,治疗选择有限,临床需求远未满足,因此需要开发更有效、适用性更广的新疗法。虽然自体嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞疗法已经改变了治疗格局,但接受这些疗法的患者中有60-65%最终会复发,这凸显了改进治疗方法的必要性。同种异体CAR-T和CAR-NK细胞疗法最近已成为有前景的替代方案,有可能缩短生产时间、降低成本,并扩大可及范围,惠及更广泛的患者群体。本系统评价和荟萃分析汇总了目前关于这些新型疗法在成年r/r LBCL患者中的疗效和安全性的临床试验数据。 方法:对MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库进行系统检索,纳入截至2025年1月12日发表的涉及r/r LBCL中同种异体CAR-T和CAR-NK细胞疗法的研究。评估的主要结局是任何时间点的最佳总体缓解率(bORR)和最佳完全缓解率(bCRR)。次要结局包括1-2级和3级以上细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)、1-2级和3级以上免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)、1-2级和3级以上感染以及移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)的发生率。 结果:19项研究符合纳入和排除标准,共纳入334例患者(155例CAR-NK;179例CAR-T)可进行安全性评估,235例患者可进行缓解评估(77例CAR-NK;158例CAR-T)。最佳总体缓解率(bORR)和最佳完全缓解率(bCRR)的合并估计值分别为52.5% [95%置信区间,41.0-63.9]和32.8% [95%置信区间,24.2-42.0]。安全性分析显示,3级以上CRS(0.04% [95%置信区间0.00-0.49])或3级以上ICANS(0.64% [95%置信区间0.01-2.23])的发生率非常低,在纳入研究中的334例输注患者中仅发生1例GVH样反应,突出了CAR工程化“现成可用”同种异体疗法显著的安全性。低级别CRS的估计总体发生率为30% [95%置信区间,14-48],而低级别ICANS的估计总体发生率为1% [95%置信区间,0%-4%],明显低于当代自体CAR-T细胞产品。低级别和严重感染的发生率分别为25% [95%置信区间14-36%](n=252)和7% [95%置信区间2-14%](n=291)。 讨论:总之,同种异体CAR-T和CAR-NK细胞疗法在经过大量预处理的r/r LBCL患者中显示出令人鼓舞的疗效。再加上其良好的安全性以及现成可用细胞疗法的潜力,同种异体细胞疗法有望扩大基于活细胞治疗的可及范围,在未来几年为更广泛的患者群体带来显著疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-13
Transplant Cell Ther. 2025-4-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cell Stem Cell. 2024-6-6
Cancer Discov. 2024-7-1