Suppr超能文献

用于前列腺特异性抗原检测的毛细血管血:PSA-CAP研究

Capillary Blood for Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: The PSA-CAP Study.

作者信息

Wallisch Martin, Albers Peter, Becker Nikolaus, Boege Friedrich, Hermsen Derik, Londhe Tanmay Ramesh, Lakes Jale, Radtke Jan Philipp, Krilaviciute Agne, Seibold Petra, Benner Axel, Saadati Maral, Holdenrieder Stefan, Al-Monajjed Rouvier

机构信息

Department of Urology, Medical Faculty, University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Division of Personalized Early Detection of Prostate Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Jul 14;78:28-31. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.05.004. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Risk-adapted prostate cancer (PC) screening is currently based on a combination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, risk assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Classical venous blood sampling is usually performed by health care professionals, which may reduce participation in future population-based screening programmes due to limited resources. The PSA-CAP study (NCT06626386) evaluated the feasibility of using capillary blood from fingertip sampling compared with venous blood for PSA determination, in order to facilitate access for PSA testing. This prospective study analysed 196 men aged 40-75 yr. PSA levels were measured from both capillary and venous blood using the same analytical method. The stability of samples stored at room temperature was assessed over a week. Discomfort associated with both collection methods was evaluated using a numerical pain scale. No significant differences were found between capillary and venous PSA measurements. Samples remained stable up to 7 d without immediate centrifugation. Pain scores for capillary (1.52/10) and venous (1.61/10) collections were generally low and not significantly different ( = 0.27). Four cases had insufficient capillary blood for an analysis, and two outliers were resolved upon retesting. Capillary blood sampling is a viable alternative to venous puncture for PSA measurement, offering the same level of accuracy and stability with no difference in discomfort. This approach could enhance participation rates in future PC screening programmes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We studied an alternative method of blood collection to measure prostate-specific antigen level, a key test for prostate cancer risk, using fingertip sampling instead of venous blood. The results were comparable with and as stable as those from venous blood collection, with similar comfort levels. This technique may simplify future prostate cancer screening programmes and could lead to a higher acceptance rate.

摘要

未标注

风险适应性前列腺癌(PC)筛查目前基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测、风险评估和磁共振成像(MRI)的联合应用。传统的静脉血采样通常由医护人员进行,由于资源有限,这可能会降低未来基于人群的筛查项目的参与率。PSA-CAP研究(NCT06626386)评估了与静脉血相比,使用指尖采样的毛细血管血进行PSA测定的可行性,以方便进行PSA检测。这项前瞻性研究分析了196名年龄在40 - 75岁的男性。使用相同的分析方法从毛细血管血和静脉血中测量PSA水平。评估了在室温下保存一周的样本的稳定性。使用数字疼痛量表评估与两种采集方法相关的不适程度。毛细血管血和静脉血的PSA测量结果之间未发现显著差异。样本在不立即离心的情况下可稳定保存长达7天。毛细血管血采集(1.52/10)和静脉血采集(1.61/10)的疼痛评分总体较低,且无显著差异(P = 0.27)。有4例毛细血管血不足无法进行分析,2例异常值在重新检测后得到解决。对于PSA测量,毛细血管血采样是静脉穿刺的一种可行替代方法,具有相同的准确性和稳定性,且不适程度无差异。这种方法可以提高未来PC筛查项目的参与率。

患者总结

我们研究了一种替代的采血方法来测量前列腺特异性抗原水平,这是前列腺癌风险的一项关键检测,采用指尖采样而非静脉血。结果与静脉血采集的结果相当且同样稳定,舒适度相似。这项技术可能会简化未来的前列腺癌筛查项目,并可能导致更高的接受率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e49/12281128/e4172e6a4389/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验