• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利学术领域中的性别差异:审视过去十年医学领域内的不平等现象。

Gender differences in the Italian academic landscape: Examining inequalities within the medical area in the last decade.

作者信息

Magnano San Lio Roberta, Morini Mara, Di Rosa Enrico, Sinopoli Alessandra, Casigliani Virginia, Martella Manuela, Maugeri Andrea, Barchitta Martina, Agodi Maria Carmela, Picardi Ilenia, Agodi Antonella

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Gender Prevention Working Group, Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health (SItI), Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0325705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325705. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325705
PMID:40700349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12286393/
Abstract

Gender equality remains a key focus in research and innovation policies. However, the academic sector still exhibits significant under-representation of women in leadership roles and horizontal segregation affecting career trajectories. This study examines gender inequalities in top positions and career progression within Italy's Medical Sciences sector (Area 06) from 2014 to 2023, through data from the Cineca portal, including details on academic roles, gender, region, and scientific-disciplinary sectors (SSDs). Gender disparity was evaluated using the Glass Ceiling Index (GCI) and the Glass Door Index (GDI). Data analysis up to 2023 shows a gender inversion in career progression: women dominate early career stages - accounted for 71.5% of research fellows and 57.1% of RTDA positions -, but men prevail in senior roles, with 61.8% associate professors and 71.8% full professors. This trend is consistent across most SSDs. Although temporal analysis indicates a reduction in gender disparities in top positions - with a GCI ranging from 2.3 in 2015 to 1.7 in 2023 - GCI values above one across all regions suggest persistent gender inequality. The GDI values, ranging from 1.3 in 2015 to 1.6 in 2023, exhibit considerable variability; however, overall, the disparities have worsened by 2023. These findings underscore the need for concrete measures to enhance equity and inclusivity in academia. Developing and implementing initiatives, programs, and policies that guarantee equal opportunities and resources for all researchers, irrespective of gender, is essential.

摘要

性别平等仍然是研究与创新政策的关键重点。然而,学术领域中女性担任领导职务的比例仍然显著偏低,且存在影响职业发展轨迹的横向隔离现象。本研究通过Cineca门户网站的数据,考察了2014年至2023年期间意大利医学科学领域(第06领域)高层职位和职业晋升中的性别不平等情况,数据包括学术角色、性别、地区和科学学科领域(SSD)的详细信息。使用玻璃天花板指数(GCI)和玻璃门指数(GDI)评估性别差异。截至2023年的数据分析显示职业晋升中出现了性别反转:女性在职业生涯早期阶段占主导地位——占研究员的71.5%和研究与技术开发辅助人员职位的57.1%——但男性在高级职位中占优势,副教授占61.8%,正教授占71.8%。这一趋势在大多数SSD中都是一致的。尽管时间分析表明高层职位中的性别差异有所减少——GCI从2015年的2.3降至2023年的1.7——但所有地区的GCI值均高于1,这表明性别不平等现象仍然存在。GDI值从2015年的1.3到2023年的1.6,呈现出相当大的变化;然而,总体而言,到2023年差距有所恶化。这些发现强调了采取具体措施以提高学术界公平性和包容性的必要性。制定和实施确保所有研究人员,无论性别,都能获得平等机会和资源的倡议、计划和政策至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/733d8599be4a/pone.0325705.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/806d9601a299/pone.0325705.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/a15f3b99cf5b/pone.0325705.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/1a2967725aa6/pone.0325705.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/d7406b14e239/pone.0325705.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/544ed155cdee/pone.0325705.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/733d8599be4a/pone.0325705.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/806d9601a299/pone.0325705.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/a15f3b99cf5b/pone.0325705.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/1a2967725aa6/pone.0325705.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/d7406b14e239/pone.0325705.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/544ed155cdee/pone.0325705.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f4d/12286393/733d8599be4a/pone.0325705.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender differences in the Italian academic landscape: Examining inequalities within the medical area in the last decade.意大利学术领域中的性别差异:审视过去十年医学领域内的不平等现象。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0325705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325705. eCollection 2025.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
The Glass Ceiling in Global Health: Perspectives of Female and Male Anesthesiologists.全球卫生领域的玻璃天花板:女性和男性麻醉医师的观点
Anesth Analg. 2024 Aug 12. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007142.
4
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Is Program Director Gender Associated With Gender Diversity Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs?项目主任的性别是否与骨科住院医师培训项目中的性别多样性有关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1351-1357. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003070. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
What Are the Trends in Women's Representation Among Lead Investigators of Orthopaedic Clinical Trials?女性在骨科临床试验主要研究者中的代表性趋势如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):35-44. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002769. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
7
Institutional Support for the Career Advancement of Women Faculty in Science and Academic Medicine: Successes, Challenges, and Future Directions.机构支持科学和学术医学领域女性教职员工的职业发展:成功经验、挑战与未来方向。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024 Sep;44(9):1916-1924. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.320910. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
8
The Impact of Infrastructure on Low-Income Consumers' Nutritious Diet, Women's Economic Empowerment, and Gender Equality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Evidence and Gap Map.基础设施对低收入和中等收入国家低收入消费者营养饮食、妇女经济赋权及性别平等的影响:证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 18;21(3):e70050. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70050. eCollection 2025 Sep.
9
Analysis of Gender Discrepancies in Leadership Roles and Recognition Awards in the Child Neurology Society.分析儿科学会领导层角色和认可奖项中的性别差异。
Neurology. 2024 Sep 10;103(5):e209746. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209746. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
10
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative analysis of gender disparity in academic positions based on U.S. region and STEM discipline.基于美国地区和 STEM 学科的学术职位性别差距的比较分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0298736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298736. eCollection 2024.
2
Disciplinary gender balance, research productivity, and recognition of men and women in academia.学术领域的性别均衡、研究产出,以及对男女学者的认可。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 14;18(12):e0293080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293080. eCollection 2023.
3
Unveiling the gender gap: exploring gender disparities in European academic landscape.
揭示性别差距:探索欧洲学术领域中的性别差异。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Oct 19;34:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100752. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Author Correction: Women are credited less in science than men.
Nature. 2023 Sep;621(7979):E41. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06571-x.
5
Dentistry and Gender Gap: An Overview of the Italian Situation.牙科与性别差距:意大利情况概述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;11(6):828. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060828.
6
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.学术界的性别偏见:一个需要解决的终身问题。
Neuron. 2021 Jul 7;109(13):2047-2074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.
7
Gender Discrimination in the Workplace: Effects on Pregnancy Planning and Childbirth among South Korean Women.职场性别歧视:对韩国女性怀孕计划和分娩的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 26;16(15):2672. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152672.
8
Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.《自然指数》期刊所揭示的高质量研究中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136. eCollection 2018.
9
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.