Suppr超能文献

《自然指数》期刊所揭示的高质量研究中的性别差异。

Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.

作者信息

Bendels Michael H K, Müller Ruth, Brueggmann Doerthe, Groneberg David A

机构信息

Division of Computational Medicine, Institute of Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study aims to elucidate the state of gender equality in high-quality research by analyzing the representation of female authorships in the last decade (from 2008 to 2016).

METHODS

Based on the Gendermetrics platform, 293,557 research articles from 54 journals listed in the Nature Index were considered covering the categories Life Science, Multidisciplinary, Earth & Environmental and Chemistry. The core method was the combined analysis of the proportion of female authorships and the female-to-male odds ratio for first, co- and last authorships. The distribution of prestigious authorships was measured by the Prestige Index.

RESULTS

29.8% of all authorships and 33.1% of the first, 31.8% of the co- and 18.1% of the last authorships were held by women. The corresponding female-to-male odds ratio is 1.19 (CI: 1.18-1.20) for first, 1.35 (CI: 1.34-1.36) for co- and 0.47 (CI: 0.46-0.48) for last authorships. Women are underrepresented at prestigious authorships compared to men (Prestige Index = -0.42). The underrepresentation accentuates in highly competitive articles attracting the highest citation rates, namely, articles with many authors and articles that were published in highest-impact journals. More specifically, a large negative correlation between the 5-Year-Impact-Factor of a journal and the female representation at prestigious authorships was revealed (r(52) = -.63, P < .001). Women publish fewer articles compared to men (39.0% female authors are responsible for 29.8% of all authorships) and are underrepresented at productivity levels of more than 2 articles per author. Articles with female key authors are less frequently cited than articles with male key authors. The gender-specific differences in citation rates increase the more authors contribute to an article. Distinct differences at the journal, journal category, continent and country level were revealed. The prognosis for the next decades forecast a very slow harmonization of authorships odds between the two genders.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过分析过去十年(2008年至2016年)女性作者的占比情况,阐明高质量研究中的性别平等状况。

方法

基于性别计量平台,对《自然指数》列出的54种期刊中的293,557篇研究论文进行了分析,涵盖生命科学、多学科、地球与环境以及化学等类别。核心方法是对女性作者占比以及第一作者、共同作者和最后作者的女性与男性比例进行综合分析。通过声望指数来衡量享有声望的作者身份的分布情况。

结果

所有作者中女性占29.8%,第一作者中女性占33.1%,共同作者中女性占31.8%,最后作者中女性占18.1%。第一作者的女性与男性比例为1.19(置信区间:1.18 - 1.20),共同作者为1.35(置信区间:1.34 - 1.36),最后作者为0.47(置信区间:0.46 - 0.48)。与男性相比,享有声望的作者身份中女性占比不足(声望指数 = -0.42)。在吸引最高引用率的高竞争文章中,即作者众多的文章以及发表在影响最大的期刊上的文章中,这种占比不足的情况更为明显。更具体地说,揭示了期刊的5年影响因子与享有声望的作者身份中女性占比之间存在很大的负相关(r(52) = -.63,P <.001)。与男性相比,女性发表的文章较少(39.0%的女性作者占所有作者的29.8%),并且在每位作者发表超过2篇文章的生产力水平上占比不足。有女性主要作者的文章被引用的频率低于有男性主要作者的文章。文章作者越多,引用率的性别差异就越大。在期刊、期刊类别、大陆和国家层面都发现了明显差异。未来几十年的预测表明,两性之间作者身份比例的协调将非常缓慢。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5269/5749692/fae24d4913d7/pone.0189136.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验