Suppr超能文献

器官特异性蛋白质组学衰老与认知表现:对老年人阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症风险预测的启示

Organ-specific proteomic aging and cognitive performance: Implications for risk prediction of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias in older adults.

作者信息

Kang Sujin, Baker Susan, Hayhoe Benedict, Price Geraint, Novak Gerald, Wong Janice, Middleton Lefkos, Robinson Oliver

机构信息

Ageing & Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Ageing & Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jul 22:100274. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100274.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Biological aging, characterized by cellular and molecular changes, may play a key role in neurodegenerative diseases. While recent proteomic advancements have introduced new aging clocks, widespread validation remains necessary. This study evaluated organ-specific and cognition-enriched proteomic clocks in relation to chronological age and cognitive change.

METHODS

We analyzed plasma proteomic data from the CHARIOT PRO SubStudy (N = 409), measured using the SomaScan assay (version 4.1) at four time points over three years (months 0, 12, 24, and 36). Using published proteomic organ age weights, we calculated conventional, organ-specific, and cognition-enriched biological ages and compared them with chronological age. Adjusted multilevel regression analyses assessed associations between baseline proteomic AgeGaps (biological-chronological age differences) and cognitive performance over 54 months.

RESULTS

The cohort (mean age: 71.8 ± 5.5 years; 50.1 % female) showed moderate to strong correlations between proteomic ages and chronological age (r = 0.37-0.80; MAE = 4.2-2.7). Over three years, AgeGaps increased across the conventional, organismal, muscle, liver, artery, and immune systems, ranging from 2.1 ± 1.9 to 1.0 ± 2.3 years. The artery AgeGap was most strongly associated with cognitive decline, with conventional and organismal AgeGaps showing similar patterns. Higher baseline AgeGap z-scores (i.e., greater biological age) in the artery and brain were associated with poorer cognition, as measured by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Scores (Coeff. -3.0, 95 % CI: -3.4, -2.5; and -1.1, 95 % CI: -1.5, -0.6) and the Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite (Coeff. -0.5, 95 % CI: -0.6, -0.4; and -0.14, 95 % CI: -0.3, -0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the interplay between neurological function and cardiovascular aging in cognitive decline. Organ-specific biological age assessments may aid in the early detection of age-related changes, informing personalized interventions. Our study underscores the importance of proteomic aging signatures in elucidating Alzheimer's disease mechanisms and other neurodegenerative conditions, advocating for an integrated approach to brain and cardiovascular health.

摘要

背景与目的

以细胞和分子变化为特征的生物衰老可能在神经退行性疾病中起关键作用。虽然最近蛋白质组学的进展引入了新的衰老时钟,但仍需要广泛验证。本研究评估了与实际年龄和认知变化相关的器官特异性和认知丰富的蛋白质组时钟。

方法

我们分析了CHARIOT PRO子研究(N = 409)的血浆蛋白质组数据,该数据在三年中的四个时间点(第0、12、24和36个月)使用SomaScan分析(4.1版)进行测量。使用已发表的蛋白质组器官年龄权重,我们计算了传统的、器官特异性的和认知丰富的生物年龄,并将它们与实际年龄进行比较。调整后的多级回归分析评估了基线蛋白质组年龄差距(生物年龄与实际年龄的差异)与54个月内认知表现之间的关联。

结果

该队列(平均年龄:71.8±5.5岁;50.1%为女性)显示蛋白质组年龄与实际年龄之间存在中度至强相关性(r = 0.37 - 0.80;平均绝对误差 = 4.2 - 2.7)。在三年中,传统、机体、肌肉、肝脏、动脉和免疫系统的年龄差距均有所增加,范围从2.1±1.9岁到1.0±2.3岁。动脉年龄差距与认知衰退的关联最为强烈,传统和机体年龄差距呈现相似模式。动脉和大脑中较高的基线年龄差距z分数(即生物年龄更大)与较差的认知能力相关,这通过用于评估神经心理状态总分的可重复成套测验(系数 -3.0,95%置信区间:-3.4,-2.5;以及 -1.1,95%置信区间:-1.5,-0.6)和临床前阿尔茨海默病认知综合指标(系数 -0.5,95%置信区间:-0.6,-0.4;以及 -0.14,95%置信区间:-0.3,-0.03)来衡量。

结论

这些发现突出了神经功能与心血管衰老在认知衰退中的相互作用。器官特异性生物年龄评估可能有助于早期发现与年龄相关的变化,为个性化干预提供依据。我们的研究强调了蛋白质组衰老特征在阐明阿尔茨海默病机制和其他神经退行性疾病中的重要性,倡导采用综合方法促进大脑和心血管健康。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验