Fattorini I, Westlake D, Turk A, Mahtani K R, Tierney S
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 23;26(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02908-9.
Social prescribing (SP) seeks to support patients' wider needs by connecting them to non-medical community resources. Link workers (LWs) facilitate SP's delivery across the National Health Service (NHS) in England. As a concept, SP may be perceived in different ways by various stakeholders. This study set out to explore how SP is understood among healthcare professionals (HCPs), voluntary and community sector (VCS) representatives, LWs, and patients (Ps) in England.
A secondary qualitative analysis was conducted using interview data from a realist evaluation on the implementation of LWs in primary care. Interview data from 106 participants (HCPs, VCS representatives, LWs, Ps), across seven sites in England, were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Analysis resulted in 127 codes. These were clustered into the following themes: (1) the need for system optimisation, (2) SP as a tool for personal empowerment, (3) SP's broad and inclusive nature, (4) community engagement through LWs, and (5) a holistic approach to well-being. These themes highlight SP's potential as an integrated and empowering ecosystem; requiring effective collaboration and clearer communication among stakeholders to enhance understanding of its purpose, streamline referral processes, and align expectations for greater impact. Understanding of SP could be related to five broad questions around how, who, what, where, and why; the themes produced from the analysis aligned with these questions, each exploring different dimensions of SP. Through this, we developed the 5Ws Framework, which is outlined in the paper.
SP is not a standalone intervention; it is a complex system that requires optimisation and balance across its elements. Its effectiveness as an integrated empowerment ecosystem depends on addressing all facets of the 5Ws-how, who, what, where, and why it operates-engaging the right stakeholders, clearly defining its scope, and implementing it appropriately. Policymakers and commissioners could use the 5Ws Framework to guide decision-making, align health system priorities, and ensure the effective integration of SP within primary care.
社会处方(SP)旨在通过将患者与非医疗社区资源相连接,来满足他们更广泛的需求。联络人员(LWs)推动社会处方在英格兰国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中的实施。作为一个概念,社会处方可能会被不同的利益相关者以不同的方式理解。本研究旨在探讨在英格兰的医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)、志愿和社区部门(VCS)代表、联络人员以及患者中,社会处方是如何被理解的。
使用来自一项关于联络人员在初级保健中实施情况的现实主义评价的访谈数据进行二次定性分析。对来自英格兰七个地点的106名参与者(医疗保健专业人员、志愿和社区部门代表、联络人员、患者)的访谈数据进行反思性主题分析。
分析得出127个编码。这些编码被归纳为以下主题:(1)系统优化的必要性;(2)社会处方作为个人赋权的工具;(3)社会处方广泛且包容的性质;(4)通过联络人员进行社区参与;(5)全面的幸福观。这些主题凸显了社会处方作为一个综合且赋权的生态系统的潜力;这需要利益相关者之间进行有效的协作和更清晰的沟通,以增进对其目的的理解,简化转诊流程,并使期望保持一致以产生更大影响。对社会处方的理解可能与围绕如何、谁、什么、何处以及为何这五个广泛的问题相关;分析得出的主题与这些问题相符,每个主题都探索了社会处方的不同维度。通过这种方式,我们开发了本文中概述的5W框架。
社会处方不是一项独立的干预措施;它是一个复杂的系统,需要对其各个要素进行优化和平衡。它作为一个综合赋权生态系统的有效性取决于解决5W的所有方面——它如何运作、由谁运作、运作什么、在何处运作以及为何运作——让合适的利益相关者参与进来,明确界定其范围,并进行适当实施。政策制定者和专员可以使用5W框架来指导决策、调整卫生系统的优先事项,并确保社会处方在初级保健中得到有效整合。