Zhu Yueyun, Fezzi Simone, Bargary Norma, Ding Daixin, Scarsini Roberto, Lunardi Mattia, Leone Antonio Maria, Mammone Concetta, Wagener Max, McInerney Angela, Toth Gabor, Pesarini Gabriele, Connolly David, Trani Carlo, Tu Shengxian, Ribichini Flavio, Burzotta Francesco, Wijns William, Simpkin Andrew J
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, University Road, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.
The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine, The Smart Sensors Laboratory and Curam, University of Galway, University Road, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Apr 8;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf031. eCollection 2025 Jul.
The classification of physiological patterns of coronary artery disease (CAD) is crucial for clinical decision-making, significantly affecting the planning and success of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). This study aimed to develop a novel index to reliably interpret and classify physiological CAD patterns based on virtual pullbacks from single-view Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) analysis.
The pullback pressure gradient index (PPGi) was used to classify CAD patterns, with a cut-off value of PPGi = 0.78 distinguishing focal from diffuse and non-focal disease. The machine learning methods using penalized logistic regression and random forest were proposed to assess CAD patterns. Scores derived from multivariate functional principal component analysis of μFR and quantitative coronary analysis improved model performance. Expert panel interpretations served as the reference. A total of 343 vessels (291 patients) underwent classification. The PPGi cut-off of 0.78 achieved 67% accuracy [95% confidence interval (CI): 66-68%] for focal vs. diffuse and 76% accuracy (95% CI: 75-76%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. The penalized logistic regression model, including PPGi as a feature, provided superior accuracy: 88% (95% CI: 87-88%) for focal vs. diffuse and 81% (95% CI: 80-81%) for focal vs. non-focal classification. Moreover, the random forest model with PPGi as one of the features was applied for multiclass classification, providing an accuracy of 73% (95% CI: 73-73%).
The machine learning models for physiological patterns of CAD classification outperformed the binary PPGi method, providing robust and generalizable classification across different study populations.
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)生理模式的分类对于临床决策至关重要,显著影响经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的规划和成功率。本研究旨在开发一种新的指标,基于单视图基于莫雷定律的定量血流比(μFR)分析的虚拟回撤,可靠地解释和分类CAD生理模式。
使用回撤压力梯度指数(PPGi)对CAD模式进行分类,PPGi = 0.78的临界值可区分局灶性与弥漫性及非局灶性疾病。提出了使用惩罚逻辑回归和随机森林的机器学习方法来评估CAD模式。从μFR的多变量功能主成分分析和定量冠状动脉分析得出的分数提高了模型性能。专家小组的解释作为参考。共有343支血管(291例患者)接受了分类。PPGi临界值为0.78时,局灶性与弥漫性分类的准确率为67%[95%置信区间(CI):66 - 68%],局灶性与非局灶性分类的准确率为76%(95% CI:75 - 76%)。包括PPGi作为特征的惩罚逻辑回归模型提供了更高的准确率:局灶性与弥漫性分类为88%(95% CI:87 - 88%),局灶性与非局灶性分类为81%(95% CI:80 - 81%)。此外,将以PPGi作为特征之一的随机森林模型应用于多类分类,准确率为73%(95% CI:73 - 73%)。
用于CAD分类生理模式的机器学习模型优于二元PPGi方法,在不同研究人群中提供了稳健且可推广的分类。