• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地震心动图在检测前负荷变化和心血管疾病中的评估:与经胸超声心动图的对比研究

Evaluation of seismocardiography in detecting pre-load changes and cardiovascular disease: a comparative study with transthoracic echocardiography.

作者信息

Agam Ahmad, Agam Ali, Korsgaard Emil, Yding Troels, Kristensen Charlotte Burup, Mogelvang Rasmus, Kragholm Kristian, Emerk Kasper Janus Grønn, Søgaard Peter, Schmidt Samuel Emil

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Apr 16;6(4):811-821. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf037. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf037
PMID:40703121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12282387/
Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to test whether seismocardiography (SCG) can detect changes in loading conditions and detect significant differences in SCG signals between healthy individuals and those with cardiovascular disease (CVD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six subjects (age 45 ± 16 years and 77% male) were included, 11 healthy subjects and 15 subjects with CVD. SCG was compared with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before and after infusion of 2 L of isotonic saline. Nine subjects (34%) with CVD did not tolerate the full infusion (2 L infusion intolerant), while the remaining 17 subjects (2 L infusion tolerant) successfully completed the infusion. Significant changes in SCG measurements were observed after infusion, including amplitudes Ls (19%, = 0.015), Dd (23%, = 0.016), and Ed (48%, < 0.001) as well as most time intervals. TTE measurements also showed post-infusion changes in stroke volume (15%, = 0.038), mitral annular velocity (7%, = 0.013), left ventricular ejection time (1%, = 0.035), and global longitudinal strain (6%, = 0.003). Although SCG did not detect differences between the healthy and CVD groups, the diastolic amplitude Cd-Dd significantly differed between the infusion tolerant and intolerant groups (pre-infusion: 7.7 vs. 3.7 mg, = 0.046; post-infusion: 8.3 vs. 4.1 mg, = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

SCG can detect changes in pre-load in both healthy subjects and subjects with CVD. SCG were also able to detect differences in SCG diastolic amplitudes between infusion-tolerant and -intolerant subjects, which may indicate ability to detect diastolic dysfunction and differences in left ventricular filling pressures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在测试地震心音图(SCG)能否检测负荷条件的变化,并检测健康个体与心血管疾病(CVD)患者之间SCG信号的显著差异。

方法与结果

纳入26名受试者(年龄45±16岁,77%为男性),其中11名健康受试者和15名CVD受试者。在输注2L等渗盐水前后,将SCG与经胸超声心动图(TTE)进行比较。9名(34%)CVD受试者不能耐受全部输注量(2L输注不耐受),而其余17名受试者(2L输注耐受)成功完成输注。输注后观察到SCG测量值有显著变化,包括振幅Ls(19%,P = 0.015)、Dd(23%,P = 0.016)和Ed(48%,P < 0.001)以及大多数时间间隔。TTE测量值也显示输注后每搏输出量(15%,P = 0.038)、二尖瓣环速度(7%,P = 0.013)、左心室射血时间(1%,P = 0.035)和整体纵向应变(6%,P = 0.003)发生变化。虽然SCG未检测到健康组与CVD组之间的差异,但输注耐受组与不耐受组之间的舒张期振幅Cd - Dd有显著差异(输注前:7.7 vs. 3.7mg,P = 0.046;输注后:8.3 vs. 4.1mg,P = 0.034)。

结论

SCG能够检测健康受试者和CVD受试者的前负荷变化。SCG还能够检测输注耐受和不耐受受试者之间SCG舒张期振幅的差异,这可能表明其能够检测舒张功能障碍和左心室充盈压力的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/789d02e04c11/ztaf037f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/c685b6331c98/ztaf037_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/95a16facfec0/ztaf037f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/a9c4d60ef001/ztaf037f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/789d02e04c11/ztaf037f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/c685b6331c98/ztaf037_ga.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/95a16facfec0/ztaf037f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/a9c4d60ef001/ztaf037f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20a9/12282387/789d02e04c11/ztaf037f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of seismocardiography in detecting pre-load changes and cardiovascular disease: a comparative study with transthoracic echocardiography.地震心动图在检测前负荷变化和心血管疾病中的评估:与经胸超声心动图的对比研究
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Apr 16;6(4):811-821. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf037. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Erectile Dysfunction Is Associated with Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.勃起功能障碍与左心室舒张功能障碍相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Nov;9(6):903-912. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
4
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.吸入用甘露醇治疗囊性纤维化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 9;2(2):CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub3.
5
Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity-to-Global Longitudinal Strain Ratio: A Tool for Differentiating Heart Failure Subtypes?估计脉搏波速度与整体纵向应变比值:一种区分心力衰竭亚型的工具?
Cardiology. 2025 May 23:1-11. doi: 10.1159/000546345.
6
Integrating Left Atrial Reservoir Strain Into the First-Line Assessment of Diastolic Function: Prognostic Implications in a Community-Based Cohort With Normal Left Ventricular Systolic Function.将左心房储备应变纳入舒张功能的一线评估:对左心室收缩功能正常的社区队列的预后意义
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2025 Jul;38(7):570-582. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2025.03.012. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
7
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;2015(5):CD003475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.吸入用甘露醇治疗囊性纤维化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 9(10):CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub2.
10
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased preload and echocardiographic assessment of diastolic function.增加前负荷和超声心动图评估舒张功能。
Echocardiography. 2024 Sep;41(9):e15917. doi: 10.1111/echo.15917.
2
Seismocardiography and echocardiography: the correlation in the systolic complex.心冲击图和超声心动图:收缩期综合的相关性。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024 Aug 13;10(5). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad6a67.
3
Correlation between diastolic seismocardiography variables and echocardiography variables.舒张期心震图变量与超声心动图变量之间的相关性。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2022 Sep 2;3(3):465-472. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac043. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography.二维超声心动图定量左心室质量的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):9980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1.
5
Can Seismocardiogram Fiducial Points Be Used for the Routine Estimation of Cardiac Time Intervals in Cardiac Patients?地震心动图基准点能否用于心脏疾病患者心脏时间间期的常规评估?
Front Physiol. 2022 Mar 18;13:825918. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.825918. eCollection 2022.
6
Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology.心力衰竭的全球负担:流行病学的全面更新综述
Cardiovasc Res. 2023 Jan 18;118(17):3272-3287. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013.
7
Estimation of Changes in Intracardiac Hemodynamics Using Wearable Seismocardiography and Machine Learning in Patients With Heart Failure: A Feasibility Study.使用可穿戴地震心动图和机器学习估计心力衰竭患者心内血液动力学变化的可行性研究。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Aug;69(8):2443-2455. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3147066. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
8
Bioreactance Cardiac Output Trending Ability in Preterm Infants: A Single Centre, Longitudinal Study.早产儿生物电阻抗心输出量趋势能力:单中心纵向研究。
Neonatology. 2021;118(5):600-608. doi: 10.1159/000518656. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
9
Recent Advances in Seismocardiography.地震心图学的最新进展
Vibration. 2019 Mar;2(1):64-86. doi: 10.3390/vibration2010005. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
Layer-Specific Strain Is Preload Dependent: Comparison between Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature-Tracking.层特异性应变与前负荷相关:斑点追踪超声心动图与心脏磁共振特征追踪的比较。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021 Apr;34(4):377-387. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2020.12.024. Epub 2021 Jan 6.