Department of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet - University hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 15;12(1):9980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13677-1.
Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a strong independent predictor for adverse cardiovascular events, but conventional echocardiographic methods are limited by poor reproducibility and accuracy. We developed a novel method based on adding the mean wall thickness from the parasternal short axis view, to the left ventricular end-diastolic volume acquired using the biplane model of discs. The participants (n = 85) had various left ventricular geometries and were assessed using echocardiography followed immediately by cardiac magnetic resonance, as reference. We compared our novel two-dimensional (2D) method to various conventional one-dimensional (1D) and other 2D methods as well as the three-dimensional (3D) method. Our novel method had better reproducibility in intra-examiner [coefficients of variation (CV) 9% vs. 11-14%] and inter-examiner analysis (CV 9% vs. 10-20%). Accuracy was similar to the 3D method (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement, CV): Novel: 2 ± 50 g, 15% vs. 3D: 2 ± 51 g, 16%; and better than the "linear" 1D method by Devereux (7 ± 76 g, 23%). Our novel method is simple, has considerable better reproducibility and accuracy than conventional "linear" 1D methods, and similar accuracy as the 3D-method. As the biplane model forms part of the standard echocardiographic protocol, it does not require specific training and provides a supplement to the modern echocardiographic report.
左心室质量(LVM)增加是不良心血管事件的强有力的独立预测因子,但传统的超声心动图方法受到重复性和准确性差的限制。我们开发了一种新方法,该方法基于从胸骨旁短轴视图添加平均壁厚度,来获取双平面圆盘模型的左心室舒张末期容积。参与者(n=85)具有不同的左心室几何形状,并立即通过超声心动图和心脏磁共振进行评估,作为参考。我们将我们的新二维(2D)方法与各种传统的一维(1D)和其他 2D 方法以及三维(3D)方法进行了比较。我们的新方法在检查内[变异系数(CV)为 9%,而 11-14%]和检查间分析中具有更好的可重复性(CV 为 9%,而 10-20%)。准确性与 3D 方法相似(平均差异±95%置信区间,CV):新方法:2±50g,15%与 3D:2±51g,16%;并且优于 Devereux 的“线性”1D 方法(7±76g,23%)。我们的新方法简单,重复性和准确性明显优于传统的“线性”1D 方法,并且与 3D 方法的准确性相似。由于双平面模型是标准超声心动图协议的一部分,因此不需要特定的培训,并且为现代超声心动图报告提供了补充。