Zhang Mengfan, Guo Xiaofang, Chen Yuanjun, Liu Xinghua, Lin Xingdong
Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 9;13:1556263. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1556263. eCollection 2025.
This study aims to investigate the association between exposure to insecticide exposomics and cognitive function, among adults aged 60 and above.
We employed a multi-stage probability sampling method to analyze data derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) conducted between 2011 and 2014. The study investigated the impact of insecticides exposure on cognitive performance, as measured by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) Word Learning Test (CERAD-WL), CERAD Delayed Recall Test (CERAD-DR), Animal Fluency Test (ATF), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the impact, with adjustments for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables, and subgroup analyses were conducted to further elucidate the findings.
A total of 1,544 participants were included after applying strict exclusion criteria. Logistic regression analysis disclosed a significant association between insecticides exposure and the risk of cognitive impairment. Specifically, for CERAD-WL, the unadjusted model showed an Odds Ratio (OR) of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.49-0.93), = 0.0174, and the adjusted model showed an OR of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51-0.99), = 0.0466. CERAD-DR demonstrated an unadjusted OR of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.46-0.88), = 0.0060, and an adjusted OR of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.47-0.94), = 0.021. The DSST indicated a correlation with pesticide exposure in the unadjusted model with = 0.0214. Herbicides were notably associated with ATF in the unadjusted model with an OR of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.14-2.53), = 0.0093. However, after adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables, some associations were no longer statistically significant. For instance, the association between insecticides exposure and CERAD-WL performance became non-significant (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.56-1.15, = 0.2284), and similarly for CERAD-DR (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.50-1.03, = 0.0734).
Our study indicates an association between insecticides exposure and cognitive impairment, particularly affecting memory and delayed recall. Yet, the cross-sectional design prevents conclusive causality claims. Future research should adopt longitudinal approaches, utilize biological markers for precise exposure measurement, and apply advanced statistical techniques to better understand the exposure-outcome relationship. Including a broader age range and detailed confounder data will also strengthen causal inferences. While our findings offer preliminary evidence, more robust studies are necessary to confirm causality and guide preventive measures.
本研究旨在调查60岁及以上成年人接触杀虫剂暴露组学与认知功能之间的关联。
我们采用多阶段概率抽样方法,分析2011年至2014年期间进行的美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)所获得的数据。该研究调查了杀虫剂暴露对认知表现的影响,认知表现通过阿尔茨海默病注册协会(CERAD)单词学习测试(CERAD-WL)、CERAD延迟回忆测试(CERAD-DR)、动物流畅性测试(ATF)和数字符号替换测试(DSST)来衡量。使用逻辑回归模型评估影响,并对社会人口统计学和生活方式变量进行调整,同时进行亚组分析以进一步阐明研究结果。
在应用严格的排除标准后,共纳入了1544名参与者。逻辑回归分析揭示了杀虫剂暴露与认知障碍风险之间存在显著关联。具体而言,对于CERAD-WL,未调整模型显示优势比(OR)为0.68(95%置信区间:0.49 - 0.93),P = 0.0174,调整模型显示OR为0.71(95%置信区间:0.51 - 0.99),P = 0.0466。CERAD-DR未调整的OR为0.64(95%置信区间:0.46 - 0.88),P = 0.0060,调整后的OR为0.67(95%置信区间:0.47 - 0.94),P = 0.021。DSST在未调整模型中显示与农药暴露存在相关性,P = 0.0214。在未调整模型中,除草剂与ATF显著相关,OR为1.70(95%置信区间:1.14 - 2.53),P = 0.0093。然而,在对社会人口统计学和生活方式变量进行调整后,一些关联不再具有统计学意义。例如,杀虫剂暴露与CERAD-WL表现之间的关联变得不显著(OR:0.80,95%置信区间:0.56 - 1.15,P = 0.2284),CERAD-DR情况类似(OR:0.72,95%置信区间:0.50 - 1.03,P = 0.0734)。
我们的研究表明杀虫剂暴露与认知障碍之间存在关联,尤其影响记忆和延迟回忆。然而,横断面设计阻碍了确定性因果关系的断言。未来的研究应采用纵向研究方法,利用生物标志物进行精确的暴露测量,并应用先进的统计技术来更好地理解暴露 - 结果关系。纳入更广泛的年龄范围和详细的混杂因素数据也将加强因果推断。虽然我们的研究结果提供了初步证据,但需要更有力的研究来证实因果关系并指导预防措施。