Suppr超能文献

两种后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体在近视患者中的视觉效果:一项对侧眼研究。

Visual outcomes with two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses in myopic patients: a contralateral eye study.

作者信息

Li Boliang, Chen Xun, Cheng Mingrui, Lin I-Chun, Jiang Yinjie, Lei Yadi, Xu Guanghan, Li Mingwei, Mao Zhiwei, Zhou Xingtao, Wang Xiaoying

机构信息

Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

National Health Commission Key Lab of Myopia (Fudan University), Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 9;12:1438569. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1438569. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Assess the efficacy, safety, and visual quality of two posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (PIOL) for myopia correction.

METHODS

In this randomized double-blind prospective controlled trial, 38 eyes of 19 myopic patients received phakic refractive (PR) IOL in one eye and implantable collamer lens (EVO ICL) in the opposite eye and were followed up for 1 year. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, vault, disk halo size, contrast sensitivity, higher-order aberrations, retinal imaging quality, intraocular scattering, and subjective glare/halo perception were measured.

RESULTS

At 1 year, mean efficacy indices were 1.03 ± 0.16 (PR) and 1.01 ± 0.15 (ICL), and mean safety indices were 1.18 ± 0.07 (PR) and 1.15 ± 0.09 (ICL). The PR group had lower vaults than those of the ICL group at 1 year (342.63 ± 153.94 vs. 470.00 ± 230.31 μm, = 0.010). One month postoperatively, the severity of glare/halo was significantly milder in the PR group than that in the ICL group ( = 0.035). However, 1 year postoperatively, no significant differences were observed in the severity of glare/halo between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Phakic refractive implantation is a safe and effective treatment option for myopia. The PR group exhibited lower vaults than those of the ICL group. The PR group had milder glare/halo in the early postoperative period compared to the ICL group, though long-term differences were not significant.

摘要

目的

评估两种后房型有晶状体眼人工晶状体(PIOL)矫正近视的疗效、安全性及视觉质量。

方法

在这项随机双盲前瞻性对照试验中,19例近视患者的38只眼,一只眼植入有晶状体眼屈光(PR)人工晶状体,另一只眼植入可植入式角膜接触镜(EVO ICL),并随访1年。测量裸眼远视力、矫正远视力、前房深度、盘状光晕大小、对比敏感度、高阶像差、视网膜成像质量、眼内散射以及主观眩光/光晕感知。

结果

1年后,平均疗效指数PR组为1.03±0.16,ICL组为1.01±0.15;平均安全指数PR组为1.18±0.07,ICL组为1.15±0.09。1年后PR组的前房深度低于ICL组(342.63±153.94 vs. 470.00±230.31μm,P = 0.010)。术后1个月,PR组眩光/光晕的严重程度明显低于ICL组(P = 0.035)。然而,术后1年,两组之间眩光/光晕的严重程度未观察到显著差异。

结论

有晶状体眼屈光植入术是一种安全有效的近视治疗选择。PR组的前房深度低于ICL组。与ICL组相比,PR组术后早期眩光/光晕较轻,尽管长期差异不显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88f6/12283568/a98efb2e0174/fmed-12-1438569-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验