• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信迪利单抗联合放化疗用于高危局部晚期鼻咽癌的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab additional to chemoradiotherapy in high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

作者信息

She Longjiang, Tang Siqi, Han Jiaqi, Liu Guichao, Chen Lusi, Zhang Yang, Luo Weijun, Zuo Weihan, Ma Feng, Xiong Yan, Zhang Ning

机构信息

Department of Nasopharyngeal Oncology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.

Foshan Key Laboratory of Precision Therapy in Oncology and Neurology, First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 9;16:1548710. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1548710. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2025.1548710
PMID:40703356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12283321/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The recently released CONTINUUM trial was the first phase 3 randomized study to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), showing that sintilimab can bring clinical benefits to these populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed a Markov model to assess the cost and effectiveness of sintilimab plus standard therapy versus standard therapy alone. The primary outcomes included total costs, life-years, quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs). A series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the stability of the model.

RESULTS

When compared to standard therapy, the addition of sintilimab yielded extra 3.10 QALYs at an increased cost of $24208.60, resulting in an ICER of $7819.669 per QALY. Our one-way sensitivity analysis indicated that the utility of event-free survival and the risk of leukopenia/neutropenia in immunotherapy group were the most influential factors impacting the results. The incorporation of sintilimab alongside standard therapy demonstrated a 95.4% probability of being cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

First-line induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy with sintilimab was identified as a cost-effectiveness treatment option for high-risk locoregionally advanced NPC.

摘要

目的

最近公布的CONTINUUM试验是第一项证明免疫疗法在高危局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)中的疗效和安全性的3期随机研究,表明信迪利单抗可为这些人群带来临床益处。

材料与方法

我们建立了一个马尔可夫模型,以评估信迪利单抗联合标准疗法与单纯标准疗法的成本和效果。主要结果包括总成本、生命年、质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了一系列敏感性分析以检验模型的稳定性。

结果

与标准疗法相比,添加信迪利单抗可额外获得3.10个QALY,但成本增加了24208.60美元,导致每QALY的ICER为7819.669美元。我们的单向敏感性分析表明,无事件生存的效用和免疫治疗组中白细胞减少/中性粒细胞减少的风险是影响结果的最主要因素。信迪利单抗与标准疗法联合使用具有95.4%的成本效益概率。

结论

信迪利单抗一线诱导同步放化疗被确定为高危局部晚期NPC的一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12283321/658f9063ffd1/fphar-16-1548710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12283321/29c7d905ec0b/fphar-16-1548710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12283321/9a9b3879994e/fphar-16-1548710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12283321/658f9063ffd1/fphar-16-1548710-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12283321/29c7d905ec0b/fphar-16-1548710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12283321/9a9b3879994e/fphar-16-1548710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12283321/658f9063ffd1/fphar-16-1548710-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab additional to chemoradiotherapy in high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.信迪利单抗联合放化疗用于高危局部晚期鼻咽癌的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 9;16:1548710. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1548710. eCollection 2025.
2
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
3
Induction chemotherapy regimes in first-line treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.局部晚期鼻咽癌一线治疗中的诱导化疗方案:一项网络荟萃分析和成本效果分析。
Oral Oncol. 2024 Jul;154:106865. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106865. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Cost-effectiveness of enzalutamide with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) versus ADT alone for the treatment of high-risk biochemically recurrent non-metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer in Canada.恩杂鲁胺联合雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)与单纯ADT治疗加拿大高危生化复发非转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):766-777. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2503660. Epub 2025 May 23.
5
Immune checkpoint inhibitors as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis.免疫检查点抑制剂作为晚期食管鳞癌二线治疗的成本效果分析:基于网络荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2024 May 29;24(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12423-2.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
7
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
8
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
9
Cost-effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China: a comprehensive analysis.中国PD-1抑制剂联合化疗一线治疗食管鳞状细胞癌的成本效益:一项综合分析
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2482019. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2482019. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
10
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.

本文引用的文献

1
Induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without sintilimab in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China (CONTINUUM): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.中国局部晚期鼻咽癌患者同步诱导放化疗联合或不联合信迪利单抗(CONTINUUM):一项多中心、开放标签、平行分组、随机、对照、III 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2024 Jun 22;403(10445):2720-2731. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00594-4. Epub 2024 May 30.
2
Cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.卡瑞利珠单抗联合化疗对比单纯化疗用于中国复发或转移性鼻咽癌患者一线治疗的成本效果分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 18;13(12):e071832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071832.
3
Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: The JUPITER-02 Randomized Clinical Trial.特瑞普利单抗联合化疗用于复发或转移性鼻咽癌的随机对照临床研究(JUPITER-02 研究)
JAMA. 2023 Nov 28;330(20):1961-1970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20181.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.一线替雷利珠单抗联合化疗治疗复发或转移性鼻咽癌的成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 30;14:1265784. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1265784. eCollection 2023.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.替雷利珠单抗联合化疗用于中国转移性或复发性鼻咽癌患者一线治疗的成本效益分析
Head Neck. 2024 Jan;46(1):5-14. doi: 10.1002/hed.27544. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
6
First-line immunotherapy combinations for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An updated network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.一线免疫治疗联合方案治疗复发性或转移性鼻咽癌:更新的网络荟萃分析和成本效益分析。
Head Neck. 2023 Sep;45(9):2246-2258. doi: 10.1002/hed.27452. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
7
Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer: A multicenter phase 3 trial (RATIONALE-309).替雷利珠单抗联合化疗作为复发或转移性鼻咽癌的一线治疗:一项多中心 III 期试验(RATIONALE-309)。
Cancer Cell. 2023 Jun 12;41(6):1061-1072.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 May 18.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of metronomic capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.节拍性卡培他滨作为局部晚期鼻咽癌辅助化疗的成本效益分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 13;12:904372. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.904372. eCollection 2022.
9
Chemo-Immunotherapy Regimes for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.复发性或转移性鼻咽癌的化疗-免疫治疗方案:网状Meta分析和成本效益分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 20;13:858207. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.858207. eCollection 2022.
10
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022.NCCN 指南®洞察:头颈部癌症,第 1.2022 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Mar;20(3):224-234. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0016.