Olson Thomas E, Maturana Carlos, Hamad Christopher D, Upfill-Brown Alex M, Sheppard William L, Park Don Young
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 1250 16th St., Santa Monica, CA 90404, United States.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Irvine School of Medicine, 101 The City Drive South, Pavillion III, Building 29A, Orange, CA 92868, United States.
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jun 18;23:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100752. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Biportal endoscopic spine surgery offers advantages such as reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery, often enabling same-day discharge. However, the patient-specific factors influencing the need for inpatient admission remain unclear. This study evaluates variables contributing to overnight stays following biportal lumbar endoscopic decompression and proposes a predictive fragility score.
A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted on 84 consecutive patients undergoing one- or two-level lumbar endoscopic decompression at a single U.S. academic center. Patients with trauma, tumor, infection, or revision procedures were excluded. Cohorts were divided by discharge status: same-day discharge (outpatient) versus one or more night hospital stay (inpatient). A novel fragility score (4-21 points) incorporating age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and procedure type was developed. Sarcopenia was assessed using the psoas muscle index (PMI), defined as the ratio of psoas to vertebral cross-sectional area on preoperative imaging. Cutoff values were analyzed via Youden's statistic and receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Same-day discharge patients were significantly younger (55.3 vs. 68.5 years; p=.0003) and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (2.0 vs. 2.7; p<.0001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (1.6 vs. 3.5; p<.0001). No significant BMI difference was observed (p=.4341). Outpatients more frequently underwent discectomy; inpatients more commonly received ULBD and two-level decompression (p<.0001, p=.0014). A fragility score ≥11 predicted inpatient stay with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.810, outperforming Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (AUC 0.640). PMI did not differ between groups (p=.6732), with AUCs of 0.417 overall, and 0.482 (males), 0.487 (females). Fragility score and PMI were weakly correlated (=-0.130).
The proposed Outpatient Appropriateness Fragility Score effectively predicts inpatient admission after biportal lumbar decompression. Factors such as age, comorbidities, and surgical extent are more predictive than BMI or sarcopenia. This tool may guide preoperative planning and optimize resource utilization.
双门内镜脊柱手术具有术后疼痛减轻、恢复更快等优点,通常可实现当日出院。然而,影响住院需求的患者特异性因素仍不明确。本研究评估了双门腰椎内镜减压术后过夜住院的相关变量,并提出了一个预测脆弱性评分。
对美国一家学术中心连续84例行单节段或双节段腰椎内镜减压术的患者进行前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。排除有创伤、肿瘤、感染或翻修手术的患者。根据出院状态将队列分为:当日出院(门诊)与住院一晚或多晚(住院)。开发了一种包含年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症和手术类型的新型脆弱性评分(4 - 21分)。使用腰大肌指数(PMI)评估肌肉减少症,PMI定义为术前影像学上腰大肌与椎体横截面积之比。通过约登统计量和受试者工作特征分析来分析截断值。
当日出院患者明显更年轻(55.3岁对68.5岁;p = 0.0003),美国麻醉医师协会评分更低(2.0对2.7;p < 0.0001),Charlson合并症指数评分更低(1.6对3.5;p < 0.0001)。未观察到BMI有显著差异(p = 0.4341)。门诊患者更常接受椎间盘切除术;住院患者更常接受减压性上腰椎板成形术(ULBD)和双节段减压术(p < 0.0001,p = 0.0014)。脆弱性评分≥11预测住院,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.810,优于改良5项脆弱指数(AUC 0.64)。两组间PMI无差异(p = 0.6732),总体AUC为0.417,男性为0.482,女性为0.487。脆弱性评分与PMI弱相关(=-0.130)。
所提出的门诊适宜性脆弱性评分有效地预测了双门腰椎减压术后的住院情况。年龄、合并症和手术范围等因素比BMI或肌肉减少症更具预测性。该工具可指导术前规划并优化资源利用。