• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recovery Kinetics After Commonly Performed Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Procedures.常见微创脊柱手术操作后的恢复动力学
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Nov 1;47(21):1489-1496. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004399. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.L4-5腰椎滑脱的动态稳定:与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的比较及超过2年的随访
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jan;40(1):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15441.
4
A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.1 级退变性腰椎滑脱症微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的比较:前瞻性质量结果数据库分析。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 1;87(3):555-562. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa097.
5
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of clinical outcomes among obese patients.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗肥胖患者的临床疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jun;20(6):644-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.2.SPINE13794. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
6
Comparison of peri-operative and 12-month lifestyle outcomes in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与传统腰椎融合术围手术期及12个月生活方式结局的比较。
Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Apr;31(2):167-171. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2016.1199790. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
Intraoperative and perioperative complications in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 513 patients.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术中及围手术期并发症:513例患者的回顾性研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 May;22(5):487-95. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14129. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
8
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.I级腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:来自前瞻性多中心质量结果数据库登记处的5年随访
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22602.
9
Improvement following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients aged 70 years or older compared with younger age groups.与年轻年龄组相比,70岁及以上患者行微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的疗效改善情况。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jan;54(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22604.
10
Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后相邻节段疾病的比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Oct;21(10):1796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The utilization of a novel Outpatient Appropriateness Fragility Score to predict inpatient stay following biportal lumbar endoscopic decompression.利用一种新型门诊适用性脆弱性评分来预测双门腰椎内镜减压术后的住院时间。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jun 18;23:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100752. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Current Trends and Future Directions in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Emerging Techniques and Evolving Management Paradigms.腰椎手术的当前趋势与未来方向:新兴技术与不断演变的管理模式综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 13;14(10):3390. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103390.
3
Driving after spine surgery: biomechanics, recovery pathways, and medico-legal insights.脊柱手术后驾车:生物力学、恢复途径及法医学见解
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 15;20(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05787-z.
4
Patient Factors Associated with Recurrent Herniation and Revision Surgery following Lumbar Microdiscectomy.腰椎间盘显微切除术后复发性疝和翻修手术相关的患者因素
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Oct 5;9(2):244-250. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0148. eCollection 2025 Mar 27.
5
Distinct Recovery Patterns After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparing Minimally Invasive and Open Approaches Using Mixed-Effects Segmented Regression.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术后的不同恢复模式:使用混合效应分段回归比较微创与开放手术方法
Neurospine. 2025 Mar;22(1):3-13. doi: 10.14245/ns.2550096.048. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
6
High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF.高改良5因素衰弱指数与1或2节段腰椎微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)后更差的患者报告结局量表(PROMs)以及活动恢复减少相关。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 25:21925682251314380. doi: 10.1177/21925682251314380.
7
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Decompression Alone Versus Fusion for Predominant Back Pain.单纯微创减压与融合治疗以背痛为主的疗效比较
HSS J. 2025 Feb;21(1):42-48. doi: 10.1177/15563316231223503. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
8
Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.年龄对 L4 退变性脊椎滑脱单纯减压与融合手术比较结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Floor-Mounted Robotic Pedicle Screw Placement in Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of 1,050 Screws.腰椎手术中地面安装式机器人椎弓根螺钉置入:1050枚螺钉的分析
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):577-586. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346070.035. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
10
Step-by-step guide to robotic-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).机器人引导下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)分步指南。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Mar 15;11(5):221. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-3273. Epub 2022 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Initial Internal Validation of a Novel Classification System for Perioperative Expectations Following Minimally Invasive Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery.微创腰椎退行性疾病手术后围手术期预期的新型分类系统的制定与初步内部验证。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Nov 1;34(9):E537-E544. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001246.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Testing in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery: An Analysis of Responsiveness, Coverage, Discriminant Validity, and Concurrent Validity.患者报告结局测量信息系统物理功能计算机自适应测试在微创腰椎手术中的心理测量学评价:反应性、覆盖范围、判别有效性和同时效度分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Sep 1;28(17):717-729. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00306.
3
A Review of Techniques, Time Demand, Radiation Exposure, and Outcomes of Skin-anchored Intraoperative 3D Navigation in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Surgery.经皮微创腰椎手术中皮肤锚定术中三维导航技术、时间需求、辐射暴露和结果的综述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):E465-E476. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003310.
4
Early return to activity after minimally invasive full endoscopic decompression surgery in medical doctors.医生接受微创全内镜减压手术后早期恢复活动情况
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jan;6(Suppl 1):S294-S299. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.08.05.
5
Return to work and recovery time analysis after outpatient endoscopic lumbar transforaminal decompression surgery.门诊内镜下腰椎椎间孔减压术后的重返工作及恢复时间分析
J Spine Surg. 2020 Jan;6(Suppl 1):S100-S115. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.10.01.
6
Brake reaction time before and after surgery for patients with sequestrectomy versus conventional microdiscectomy.后路减压植骨融合术与传统微创手术治疗脊柱转移瘤患者的围手术期疗效比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Feb;72:214-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.11.041. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
7
Benchmarks of Duration and Magnitude of Opioid Consumption After Common Spinal Procedures: A Database Analysis of 47,823 Patients.常见脊柱手术后阿片类药物使用持续时间和剂量的基准:对 47823 例患者的数据库分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 1;44(23):1668-1675. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003141.
8
Opioid Consumption Patterns After Lumbar Microdiscectomy or Decompression.腰椎间盘切除术或减压术后阿片类药物的使用模式。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Nov 15;44(22):1599-1605. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003129.
9
The Impact of Preoperative Chronic Opioid Therapy in Patients Undergoing Decompression Laminectomy of the Lumbar Spine.术前慢性阿片类药物治疗对腰椎减压椎板切除术患者的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 1;45(7):438-443. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003297.
10
Retrospective Review of Immediate Restoration of Lordosis in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Static and Expandable Interbody Cages.单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中即刻恢复前凸的回顾性研究:静态与可扩张椎间融合器的比较
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2020 May 1;18(5):518-523. doi: 10.1093/ons/opz240.

常见微创脊柱手术操作后的恢复动力学

Recovery Kinetics After Commonly Performed Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Procedures.

作者信息

Shinn Daniel, Mok Jung Kee, Vaishnav Avani S, Louie Philip K, Sivaganesan Ahilan, Shahi Pratyush, Dalal Sidhant, Song Junho, Araghi Kasra, Melissaridou Dimitra, Sheha Evan D, Sandhu Harvinder S, Dowdell James E, Iyer Sravisht, Qureshi Sheeraz A

机构信息

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Nov 1;47(21):1489-1496. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004399. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004399
PMID:35867600
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11905977/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center, multisurgeon, retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the timing of return to commonly performed activities following minimally invasive spine surgery. Identify preoperative factors associated with these outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Studies have reported return to activities with open techniques, but the precise timing of when patients return to these activities after minimally invasive surgery remains uncertain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent either minimally invasive lumbar laminectomy (MI-L) or minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) were included. Patient-reported outcome measures, return to drive, return to work, and discontinuation of opioids data were reviewed. Regression was conducted to identify factors associated with return to driving by 15 days, return to work by 30 days, and for discontinuing opioids by 15 days. A composite group analysis was also performed for patients who returned to all three activities by 30 days.

RESULTS

In total, 123 MI-L patients and 107 MI-TLIF patients were included. Overall, 88.8% of MI-L patients and 96.4% of MI-TLIF patients returned to driving in 11 and 18.5 days, respectively. In all, 91.9% of MI-L patients and 85.7% of MI-TLIF patients returned to work in 14 and 25 days. In all, 88.7% of MI-L patients and 92.6% of MI-TLIF patients discontinued opioids in a median of seven and 11 days. Overall, 96.2% of MI-L patients and 100% of MI-TLIF patients returned to all three activities, with a median of 27 and 31 days, respectively. Male sex [odds ratio (OR)=3.57] and preoperative 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (OR=1.08) are associated with return to driving by 15 days. Male sex (OR=3.23) and preoperative 12-Item Short Form Physical Component Score (OR=1.07) are associated with return to work by 30 days. Preoperative Visual Analog Scale back was associated with decreased odds of discontinuing opioids by 15 days (OR=0.84).

CONCLUSION

Most patients return to activity following MI-L and MI-TLIF. These findings serve as an important compass for preoperative counseling.

摘要

研究设计

单中心、多外科医生的回顾性研究。

目的

评估微创脊柱手术后恢复常见活动的时间。确定与这些结果相关的术前因素。

背景数据总结

已有研究报道了采用开放技术恢复活动的情况,但微创手术后患者恢复这些活动的确切时间仍不确定。

材料与方法

纳入接受微创腰椎椎板切除术(MI-L)或微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MI-TLIF)的患者。回顾患者报告的结局指标、恢复驾驶、恢复工作和停用阿片类药物的数据。进行回归分析以确定与术后15天恢复驾驶、30天恢复工作以及15天停用阿片类药物相关的因素。还对在30天内恢复所有三项活动的患者进行了综合组分析。

结果

共纳入123例MI-L患者和107例MI-TLIF患者。总体而言,88.8%的MI-L患者和96.4%的MI-TLIF患者分别在11天和18.5天恢复驾驶。总共,91.9%的MI-L患者和85.7%的MI-TLIF患者分别在14天和25天恢复工作。总共,88.7%的MI-L患者和92.6%的MI-TLIF患者分别在中位时间7天和11天停用阿片类药物。总体而言,96.2%的MI-L患者和100%的MI-TLIF患者恢复了所有三项活动,中位时间分别为27天和31天。男性[比值比(OR)=3.57]和术前12项简短健康调查身体成分评分(OR=1.08)与术后15天恢复驾驶相关。男性(OR=3.23)和术前12项简短健康调查身体成分评分(OR=1.07)与术后30天恢复工作相关。术前视觉模拟量表背部评分与术后15天停用阿片类药物几率降低相关(OR=0.84)。

结论

大多数患者在MI-L和MI-TLIF术后恢复活动。这些发现为术前咨询提供了重要指导。