Suppr超能文献

接受长期护理患者的微生物群移植:哨兵REACT非随机临床试验

Microbiota Transplantation Among Patients Receiving Long-Term Care: The Sentinel REACT Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Woodworth Michael H, Babiker Ahmed, Prakash-Asrani Radhika, Mehta C Christina, Steed Danielle Barrios, Ashley Amanda, Koundakjian Dylan, Acharya Adi, Grooms Lori, Bower Chris W, Suchindran Deepti R, Trehan Twinkle, Halpin Alison Laufer, Spalding Walters Maroya, Reddy Sujan C, Samore Matthew H, Roghmann Mary-Claire, Hayden Mary K, Van Riel Julia, Burd Eileen M, Lohsen Sarah, Satola Sarah W, Fridkin Scott K

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522740. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22740.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Intestinal multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization is highly prevalent in long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) patients and is associated with MDRO infection and transmission. However, there are no therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to reduce intestinal MDRO colonization.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and acceptability of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in LTACH patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center, open-label nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted from April to December 2023 at an LTACH in the Southeastern US with median 50-patient census and 28-day length of stay. Patients with MDRO colonization were identified by perirectal prevalence sampling. Patients colonized with at least 1 target MDRO were approached for informed consent for FMT. FMT recipients were compared with untreated controls with MDRO colonization. Data were analyzed from August 2024 to May 2025.

INTERVENTION

Healthy donor fecal microbiota (50-100 g stool and 250 mL normal saline with 9% glycerol) instilled via gastrostomy tube or enema without antibiotic or bowel preparation conditioning.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was frequency and severity of adverse events. Solicited adverse events were recorded for 7 days. Unsolicited adverse events were recorded for 6 months. Four weekly perirectal MDRO cultures were performed after FMT.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients, including 10 (mean [SD] age, 63.8 (14.5) years; 7 [70%] female) who received FMT and 32 contemporaneous controls (mean [SD] age, 64.0 [13.7] years; 13 [41%] female) were assessed. In 2 prevalence surveys, 23 of 32 (72%) and 26 of 34 (77%) perirectal cultures grew at least 1 MDRO. Among the FMT group, 5 patients received FMT via gastrostomy alone, 4 via enema alone, and 1 with both routes more than 30 days apart. No serious adverse events were attributed to FMT, and post-FMT solicited adverse events were mild. At final visit, all perirectal cultures from FMT recipients grew at least 1 MDRO. Post hoc analyses found numerically fewer FMT recipients had positive blood culture results (0 individuals vs 6 individuals [19%]; P = .31), pathogen intestinal dominance (2 of 8 individuals [25%] vs 4 of 8 individuals [50%]; P = .61), and 7 fewer days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient days (median [IQR], 12.6 [0-25.2] days vs 19.7 [6.5-36.1] days; P = .38) compared with controls in the 6 months after prevalence survey, although these differences were not statistically significant. Accounting for higher baseline FMT recipient antibiotic use, difference-in-differences analysis estimated 26 (95% CI, -64 to 12) fewer days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient-days after FMT, although this difference was also not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this nonrandomized pilot clinical trial, FMT was acceptable for LTACH patients without related serious adverse events. Although not powered to test these outcomes, this study found potential reductions in bacteremia, intestinal pathogen domination, and antibiotic use associated with FMT, suggesting FMT should be evaluated in larger, randomized trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05780801.

摘要

重要性

肠道多重耐药菌(MDRO)定植在长期急性护理医院(LTACH)患者中非常普遍,并且与MDRO感染及传播相关。然而,美国食品药品监督管理局尚未批准任何疗法来减少肠道MDRO定植。

目的

确定粪便微生物群移植(FMT)在LTACH患者中的安全性和可接受性。

设计、地点和参与者:这项单中心、开放标签的非随机临床试验于2023年4月至12月在美国东南部的一家LTACH进行,该医院平均患者普查人数为50人,平均住院时间为28天。通过直肠周围患病率抽样确定MDRO定植患者。对至少定植1种目标MDRO的患者进行FMT知情同意。将FMT接受者与未接受治疗的MDRO定植对照者进行比较。数据于2024年8月至2025年5月进行分析。

干预措施

通过胃造瘘管或灌肠法注入健康供体粪便微生物群(50 - 100克粪便和250毫升含9%甘油的生理盐水),无需使用抗生素或进行肠道准备。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是不良事件的频率和严重程度。记录主动报告的不良事件7天。记录非主动报告的不良事件6个月。FMT后每周进行4次直肠周围MDRO培养。

结果

共评估了42例患者,其中10例(平均[标准差]年龄,63.8(14.5)岁;7例[70%]为女性)接受了FMT,32例同期对照者(平均[标准差]年龄,64.0[13.7]岁;13例[41%]为女性)。在2次患病率调查中,32例患者中有23例(72%)和34例患者中有26例(77%)的直肠周围培养物培养出至少1种MDRO。在FMT组中,5例患者仅通过胃造瘘管接受FMT,4例仅通过灌肠接受FMT,1例通过两种途径接受FMT,且两种途径间隔超过30天。没有严重不良事件归因于FMT,FMT后主动报告的不良事件较轻。在最后一次随访时,FMT接受者的所有直肠周围培养物均培养出至少1种MDRO。事后分析发现,在患病率调查后的6个月内,FMT接受者的血培养阳性结果在数值上较少(0例个体 vs 6例个体[19%];P = 0.31),病原体在肠道占优势的情况较少(8例个体中有2例[25%] vs 8例个体中有4例[50%];P = 0.61),每1000患者日的抗生素治疗天数少7天(中位数[四分位间距],12.6[0 - 25.2]天 vs 19.7[6.5 - 36.1]天;P = 0.38),尽管这些差异无统计学意义。考虑到FMT接受者较高的基线抗生素使用情况,差异 - 差异分析估计FMT后每1000患者 - 日的抗生素治疗天数减少26天(95%置信区间,-64至12),尽管这一差异也无统计学意义。

结论和相关性

在这项非随机试点临床试验中,FMT对LTACH患者是可接受的,且无相关严重不良事件。尽管本研究没有足够的效力来检验这些结局,但发现FMT可能会降低菌血症、肠道病原体占优势情况以及抗生素使用,这表明应在更大规模的随机试验中对FMT进行评估。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05780801。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验