• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用螯合剂进行最终冲洗后根管系统清洁度和封闭剂渗透情况的评估

Evaluation of the Cleanliness and Sealer Penetration of the Root Canal System Following Final Irrigation Using Chelating Agents.

作者信息

Monika Asteria, Maranantan Helga Anindyastika, Premadhika Yogi, Ratih Diatri Nari, Widyastuti Andina, Hadriyanto Wignyo, Mulyawati Ema

机构信息

Conservative Dentistry Specialist Study Programme, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Faculty of Dentistry, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Faculty of Dentistry, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

Eur Endod J. 2025 Jul;10(4):307-311. doi: 10.14744/eej.2025.59454.

DOI:10.14744/eej.2025.59454
PMID:40705448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12303131/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In root canal treatment, final root canal irrigation plays an essential role in removing smear layers, especially inorganic components, in order to achieve hermetic obturation of the root canal system. This study aimed to evaluate the root canal cleanliness, sealer penetration, and apical sealing ability of the root canal system following final irrigation using chelating agents, namely nano-chitosan, which was compared to EDTA and novel silver citrate (NSC).

METHODS

This study used 135 premolars, which were divided into three evaluations: root canal cleanliness, sealer penetration, and apical sealing ability. Teeth were assigned into three groups. Group 1: EDTA, group 2: NSC, and group 3: nano-chitosan. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used to evaluate root canal cleanliness and apical sealing ability. A stereo microscope was utilized to evaluate sealer penetration. The root canal cleanliness data were analysed using the Chi-Square test, whereas sealer penetration and apical sealing ability data were analysed with a two-way ANOVA and LSD Post-Hoc test with a significance level of 95%.

RESULTS

In the root canal cleanliness evaluation, all three final irrigation solutions showed similar cleanliness of the root canals (p>0.05). In the evaluation of sealer penetration and apical sealing ability, nano-chitosan produced the highest sealer penetration and apical sealing ability compared to EDTA and NSC (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

All final irrigations produced the same root canal cleanliness; however, nano-chitosan final irrigation solution generated the longest sealer penetration and the greatest apical sealing ability than EDTA and NSC. (EEJ-2024-12-188).

摘要

目的

在根管治疗中,根管最终冲洗对于去除玷污层,尤其是无机成分起着至关重要的作用,以实现根管系统的严密封闭。本研究旨在评估使用螯合剂(即纳米壳聚糖)进行最终冲洗后根管系统的根管清洁度、封闭剂渗透情况及根尖封闭能力,并与乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和新型柠檬酸银(NSC)进行比较。

方法

本研究使用了135颗前磨牙,分为三项评估:根管清洁度、封闭剂渗透情况和根尖封闭能力。牙齿被分为三组。第1组:EDTA,第2组:NSC,第3组:纳米壳聚糖。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估根管清洁度和根尖封闭能力。利用体视显微镜评估封闭剂渗透情况。根管清洁度数据采用卡方检验进行分析,而封闭剂渗透情况和根尖封闭能力数据采用双向方差分析和LSD事后检验进行分析,显著性水平为95%。

结果

在根管清洁度评估中,所有三种最终冲洗液显示出相似的根管清洁度(p>0.05)。在封闭剂渗透情况和根尖封闭能力评估中,与EDTA和NSC相比,纳米壳聚糖产生了最高的封闭剂渗透和根尖封闭能力(p<0.05)。

结论

所有最终冲洗均产生相同的根管清洁度;然而,纳米壳聚糖最终冲洗液比EDTA和NSC产生了最长的封闭剂渗透和最大的根尖封闭能力。(EEJ - 2024 - 12 - 188)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/12303131/401eab5a5f4d/EEJ-10-307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/12303131/4e9ca796666e/EEJ-10-307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/12303131/401eab5a5f4d/EEJ-10-307-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/12303131/4e9ca796666e/EEJ-10-307-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a75/12303131/401eab5a5f4d/EEJ-10-307-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Cleanliness and Sealer Penetration of the Root Canal System Following Final Irrigation Using Chelating Agents.使用螯合剂进行最终冲洗后根管系统清洁度和封闭剂渗透情况的评估
Eur Endod J. 2025 Jul;10(4):307-311. doi: 10.14744/eej.2025.59454.
2
Evaluation of Root Canal Cleaning and Irrigant Penetration Using Different Irrigation Protocols: A Combined SEM and Single-Tooth Micro-CT Study.使用不同冲洗方案评估根管清理和冲洗剂渗透:扫描电子显微镜和单颗牙显微计算机断层扫描联合研究
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70175. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70175.
3
Investigating the Effect of PIPS Technique by Using Er,Cr: YSGG Irradiation for Sealer Removal in Endodontic Retreatment.研究使用铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光照射的PIPS技术在根管再治疗中去除封闭剂的效果。
Eur Endod J. 2025 Jul;10(4):296-306. doi: 10.14744/eej.2025.27132.
4
Comparative analysis of dentinal tubule penetration: effects of irrigation activation methods and root canal sealers: in-vitro study.牙本质小管渗透的比较分析:冲洗激活方法和根管封闭剂的影响:体外研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):991. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06419-y.
5
Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of a Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer nRoot SP Using Different Obturation Techniques.使用不同充填技术评估硅酸钙基根管封闭剂nRoot SP的根尖封闭能力
Int Dent J. 2025 Jul 23;75(5):100916. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100916.
6
An Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Solvents in the Retreatment of Teeth Obturated using Bioceramic Sealer.三种不同溶剂对使用生物陶瓷封闭剂充填的牙齿进行再治疗的比较评价
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2025 Apr 1;26(4):403-408. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3860.
7
Evaluation the impact of access cavity design and activation of calcium silicate-based sealer with EDDY and XP-Endo Finisher on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.评估窝洞设计以及使用EDDY和XP-Endo Finisher激活硅酸钙类封闭剂对封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。
Head Face Med. 2025 Jul 26;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00530-9.
8
Comparative efficacy of solvents in removing intratubular sealer during root canal retreatment: a CLSM and SEM study.根管再治疗期间溶剂去除根管内封闭剂的比较疗效:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜和扫描电子显微镜研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1243. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06636-5.
9
Efficacy of irrigation activation methods in removal of bioceramic-based sealer in retreatment.再治疗中冲洗激活方法对去除生物陶瓷类封闭剂的效果
Odontology. 2025 Jul;113(3):1119-1127. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01054-z. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
10
Assessment of smear layer removal utilizing a conservative root canal instrumentation technique involving magnetically agitated irrigation with iron paramagnetic nanoparticles.利用一种保守的根管预备技术评估玷污层的去除情况,该技术涉及用铁顺磁性纳米颗粒进行磁搅拌冲洗。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06431-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on Radicular Dentine Structure and Matrix Metalloproteinases-A Comprehensive Review.根管冲洗液对牙根牙本质结构和基质金属蛋白酶的影响——综述
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;10(12):219. doi: 10.3390/dj10120219.
2
The Effect of a Novel Silver-Citrate Root Canal Irrigation Solution (BioAkt), Ethylenediamine Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA), and Citric Acid on the Microhardness of Root Canal Dentin: A Comparative In Vitro Study.新型柠檬酸银根管冲洗液(BioAkt)、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和柠檬酸对根管牙本质显微硬度的影响:一项体外对比研究。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 8;14(11):e31255. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31255. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Intratubular penetration capacity of HiFlow bioceramic sealer used with warm obturation techniques and single cone: A confocal laser scanning microscopic study.
采用热牙胶充填技术和单尖法时HiFlow生物陶瓷封闭剂的根管内渗透能力:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 27;8(9):e10388. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10388. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Comparison of bioceramic and epoxy resin sealers in terms of marginal adaptation and tubular penetration depth with different obturation techniques in premolar teeth: A scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscopy study.前磨牙不同充填技术下生物陶瓷和环氧树脂封闭剂在边缘适应性和根管渗入深度方面的比较:扫描电子显微镜和共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 May;11(5):1794-1797. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1386_21. Epub 2022 May 14.
5
Comparative Evaluation of the Penetration Depth into Dentinal Tubules of Three Endodontic Irrigants.三种根管冲洗剂渗入牙本质小管深度的比较评估
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 6;14(19):5853. doi: 10.3390/ma14195853.
6
Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Antibacterial Activity of a New Class of Silver Citrate-Based Compounds as Endodontic Irrigants.新型柠檬酸银基化合物作为根管冲洗剂的细胞毒性和抗菌活性评估
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 6;13(21):5019. doi: 10.3390/ma13215019.
7
An comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS).三种根管治疗螯合剂(17%乙二胺四乙酸、1%过氧乙酸、0.2%壳聚糖)对牙胶与新型生物陶瓷封闭剂(BioRoot RCS)推出粘结强度影响的比较评估
J Conserv Dent. 2019 Sep-Oct;22(5):475-478. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_90_20. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Short-Term Antibacterial Efficacy of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers Against Biofilms.三种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂对生物膜的短期抗菌效果
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Mar;54(1):3-9. doi: 10.15644/asc54/1/1.
9
In Vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties and Smear Layer Removal/Sealer Penetration of a Novel Silver-Citrate Root Canal Irrigant.新型柠檬酸银根管冲洗剂抗菌性能及玷污层去除/封闭剂渗透的体外评价
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 2;13(1):194. doi: 10.3390/ma13010194.
10
Smear Layer Removing Ability of Root Canal Irrigation Solutions: A Review.根管冲洗液去除玷污层的能力:综述
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):395-402.