Liu Min, Harris Stephany, Andreou Anna P, Al-Kaisy Adnan, Pang David, Bo Xuenong
Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Headache Research, Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0320463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320463. eCollection 2025.
Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain condition characterised by widespread pain. The current treatment primarily focuses on self-management and symptomatic relief. IV lidocaine infusion is the most performed procedure in the UK that is offered after conventional therapy has failed. We aim to identify the predictors of response to systemic lidocaine to enable targeted treatment for individuals who are more likely to benefit.
This study adheres to the RECORD guidelines for reporting studies using routinely collected observational data. It was conducted retrospectively and employed data derived from clinical records of patients who received standard care. Adult patients who had completed questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing (QST) before IV lidocaine infusion were included. We collected data consecutively from 132 patients, including 24 men and 108 women. Responders were defined as patients who experienced a pain reduction of 50% or greater lasting for at least three weeks following an IV lidocaine infusion at a dose of 5 mg/kg.
We identified 22% of patients as responders. Our findings indicate a notable gender disparity in the number of responders, with a response rate of 25.9% observed in female patients compared to 4.2% in male patients (p = 0.02). Functional impairment in the revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire was higher in female patients than male patients (22.6 ± 5.8 vs 19.8 ± 7.7, p = 0.043). Responders were younger (42.7 ± 11.2 vs 49.4 ± 11.4, p = 0.003), had shorter pain duration in years (10.0 ± 6.1 vs 14.1 ± 9.3, p = 0.015), and lower weekly pain scores (7.8 ± 1.7 vs 8.5 ± 1.4, p = 0.014). No significant difference in QST parameters or loss/gain phenotypes was observed between responders and non-responders. A normal QST was identified in 25% of responders and 16% of non-responders. Consequently, QST alone could not predict the response to systemic lidocaine infusion.
IV lidocaine infusion proves effective, especially for younger female patients, which should be added to conventional therapies for these patients.
纤维肌痛是一种以广泛疼痛为特征的慢性疼痛病症。目前的治疗主要集中在自我管理和症状缓解。静脉注射利多卡因是英国在传统治疗失败后最常采用的治疗方法。我们旨在确定对全身性利多卡因反应的预测因素,以便为更有可能受益的个体提供针对性治疗。
本研究遵循使用常规收集的观察性数据报告研究的RECORD指南。研究采用回顾性研究方法,使用来自接受标准护理患者的临床记录数据。纳入在静脉注射利多卡因前完成问卷和定量感觉测试(QST)的成年患者。我们连续收集了132名患者的数据,其中包括24名男性和108名女性。反应者定义为在静脉注射5mg/kg剂量的利多卡因后疼痛减轻50%或更多且持续至少三周的患者。
我们确定22%的患者为反应者。我们的研究结果表明,反应者数量存在显著的性别差异,女性患者的反应率为25.9%,而男性患者为4.2%(p = 0.02)。修订后的纤维肌痛影响问卷中的功能损害在女性患者中高于男性患者(22.6±5.8对19.8±7.7,p = 0.043)。反应者更年轻(42.7±11.2对49.4±11.4,p = 0.003),疼痛持续时间更短(10.0±6.1对14.1±9.3,p = 0.015),每周疼痛评分更低(7.8±1.7对8.5±1.4,p = 0.014)。反应者与非反应者在QST参数或损失/增益表型方面未观察到显著差异。25%的反应者和16%的非反应者QST正常。因此,仅QST不能预测对全身性利多卡因输注的反应。
静脉注射利多卡因被证明是有效的,特别是对年轻女性患者,应将其添加到这些患者的传统治疗中。