Carcao Manuel, Königs Christoph, Andersson Nadine G, de Kovel Marloes, de Boer-Verdonk Elsbeth, Motwani Jayashree, Blatny Jan, Olivieri Martin, van den Berg Marijke, Fischer Kathelijn
Division of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Clinical and Molecular Haemostasis, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
J Thromb Haemost. 2025 Oct;23(10):3134-3147. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2025.07.010. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
Previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A exposed to factor (F)VIII are at risk of developing high-titer inhibitors. Traditionally, such children were tried on immune tolerance induction (ITI). With availability of nonfactor therapies, recommendations regarding whether to continue trying ITI and how are lacking.
To provide data to address these questions, we reviewed the experience of ITI in Pediatric Network (PedNet) centers.
The outcomes of 231 previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors to FVIII, who were followed over a 20-year period and underwent ≥1 course of ITI, were reviewed.
The success of the first course of ITI was predicted by pre-ITI peak inhibitor titers (PITs), a family history of inhibitors, high-risk F8 gene variants, and the start of ITI within 10 months of inhibitor diagnosis. Pre-ITI PITs were a strong predictor of eventual ITI success with 1 or more ITI courses: 76.4% of those with pre-ITI PITs of 5 to 39 Bethesda Units (BUs) achieved tolerance (median, 0.72 years) vs 70.9% of those with pre-ITI PITs of 40 to 200 BU (median, 2.1 years) vs 42.1% of those with pre-ITI PITs of >200 BU (median, 5.1 years). A PIT of >200 BU during the first course of ITI was a strong predictor of ultimately failing ITI. The ITI regimen, whether administered daily or nondaily at a high or low dose, was not a predictor of ITI success with the first course of ITI.
These predictors of success may be used to decide whether and how to initiate ITI when nonreplacement prophylaxis is available.
既往未经治疗的重度甲型血友病患者接受凝血因子(F)VIII治疗时,有产生高滴度抑制物的风险。传统上,这类儿童会尝试进行免疫耐受诱导(ITI)治疗。随着非凝血因子疗法的出现,关于是否继续尝试ITI以及如何进行ITI治疗的建议尚付阙如。
为解答这些问题提供数据,我们回顾了儿科网络(PedNet)中心的ITI治疗经验。
回顾了231例既往未经治疗的重度甲型血友病且对FVIII产生高滴度抑制物的患者的治疗结果,这些患者在20年期间接受了随访并接受了≥1个疗程的ITI治疗。
ITI首个疗程的成功可通过ITI前的抑制物峰值滴度(PIT)、抑制物家族史、高风险F8基因变异以及在抑制物诊断后10个月内开始ITI治疗来预测。ITI前的PIT是1个或更多ITI疗程最终ITI成功的有力预测指标:ITI前PIT为5至39贝塞斯达单位(BU)的患者中,76.4%实现了耐受(中位数为0.72年);ITI前PIT为40至200 BU的患者中,这一比例为70.9%(中位数为2.1年);而ITI前PIT>200 BU的患者中,这一比例为42.1%(中位数为5.1年)。ITI首个疗程期间PIT>200 BU是ITI最终失败的有力预测指标。ITI方案,无论是每日还是非每日给药,高剂量还是低剂量给药,均不是ITI首个疗程成功的预测指标。
在有非替代预防措施的情况下,这些成功预测指标可用于决定是否以及如何启动ITI治疗。