Nannim Fadip Audu, Ibezim Nnenna E, Mosia Moeketsi, Oguguo Basil C E
Department of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Technology Education, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Department of Computer and Robotics Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria.
Front Robot AI. 2025 Jul 10;12:1615427. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1615427. eCollection 2025.
Programming is a fundamental skill in the 21st century, yet there is a global shortage of skilled programmers for high-tech jobs. This study determined the effects of Project-Based Arduino Robot Application (PARA) on undergraduate students' achievement and task persistence in robotics programming.
The quasi-experimental research design was adopted for the study. A sample of 74 second-year computer and robotics education students from three intact classes in three tertiary institutions offering robotics programming II were selected forthe study.
PARA improved the academic achievement of students in robotics programming (63.00 ± 16.81) more than the conventional method, which uses Interactive PowerPoint (IPP) (43.79 ± 12.07). PARA improved the task persistence of students in robotics programming (73.75 ± 13.46) more than the conventional method (40.00 ± 13.70). Male students taught robotics programming using PARA had a slightly higher mean achievement score (69.60 ± 11.50) than their female counterparts (52.00 ± 19.43). Female students taught robotics programming using PARA had a slightly higher mean task persistence score (78.67 ± 11.96) than their male counterparts (70.80 ± 14.02). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in students' mean achievement scores based on the instruction method used in teaching robotics programming, among others. These findings have implications for instructing students who find robotics programming difficult and abstract.
编程是21世纪的一项基本技能,但全球高科技工作中熟练程序员短缺。本研究确定了基于项目的Arduino机器人应用(PARA)对本科生机器人编程成绩和任务坚持性的影响。
本研究采用准实验研究设计。从三所提供机器人编程II课程的高等院校的三个完整班级中选取了74名计算机与机器人教育专业二年级学生作为研究样本。
与使用交互式PowerPoint(IPP)的传统方法(43.79±12.07)相比,PARA提高了学生在机器人编程方面的学业成绩(63.00±16.81)。与传统方法(40.00±13.70)相比,PARA提高了学生在机器人编程方面的任务坚持性(73.75±13.46)。使用PARA教授机器人编程的男学生平均成绩得分(69.60±11.50)略高于女学生(52.00±19.43)。使用PARA教授机器人编程的女学生平均任务坚持性得分(78.67±11.96)略高于男学生(70.80±14.02)。基于教授机器人编程所使用的教学方法等因素,学生的平均成绩得分存在显著差异(p<0.05)。这些发现对指导那些觉得机器人编程困难和抽象学生具有启示意义。