Gual-Gonzalez Lídia, Boehme Hunter M, Leasure Peter, Baker Pieter A, Nolan Melissa S
University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Health Justice. 2025 Jul 25;13(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40352-025-00356-2.
As the opioid overdose crisis continues to produce excessive morbidity and mortality in the United States, government agencies have applied various approaches to prevent overdoses, including law-enforcement efforts (e.g., arresting people who use drugs, interrupting drug traffickers, etc.) and treatment-based approaches (e.g., naloxone, medications for opioid use disorder, etc.). Public perception and support of these approaches are relevant for informing policy, allocating resources, and effectively implementing community interventions to prevent drug-related harms.
Using an embedded informational survey design, we experimentally assessed whether public support for strategies to prevent overdose in South Carolina is influenced by language from federal agencies describing treatment- or enforcement-based approaches. Respondents were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) enforcement -based approach, (2) treatment-based approach, or (3) the control condition. Those assigned to experimental groups were presented with statistics on drug overdose deaths, followed by an informational prompt with language about overdose prevention approaches from either DEA (enforcement) or NIH (treatment), while the control group received no informational prompt.
Findings from a sample of 4,675 respondents indicated that those assigned the DEA prompt were significantly more likely to support enforcement-based approaches in arresting drug traffickers and people who use drugs (AME = 0.060, p < 0.001). On the other hand, those assigned to the NIH prompt were significantly more likely to agree that both law enforcement (AME = 0.065, p < 0.0001) and clinicians (AME = 0.044, p < 0.05) are capable of preventing drug overdose deaths.
These findings shed light on public perceptions of approaches to addressing the opioid epidemic and limited modifiability when presented with language from federal agencies. This may inform future research, practice, and/or policy aiming to maintain public safety while also providing treatment options to people who use drugs in order to reduce overdose deaths.
由于阿片类药物过量危机在美国持续导致过高的发病率和死亡率,政府机构已采取各种方法来预防过量用药,包括执法行动(例如逮捕吸毒人员、打击毒贩等)和基于治疗的方法(例如纳洛酮、用于阿片类药物使用障碍的药物等)。公众对这些方法的认知和支持对于制定政策、分配资源以及有效实施社区干预措施以预防与毒品相关的危害至关重要。
我们采用嵌入式信息调查设计,通过实验评估南卡罗来纳州公众对预防过量用药策略的支持是否受到联邦机构描述基于治疗或执法方法的措辞的影响。受访者被随机分为三组之一:(1)基于执法的方法组,(2)基于治疗的方法组,或(3)对照组。被分配到实验组的人会看到药物过量死亡的统计数据,随后是来自美国缉毒局(执法)或美国国立卫生研究院(治疗)关于过量用药预防方法的信息提示,而对照组则没有收到信息提示。
对4675名受访者的样本调查结果表明,收到美国缉毒局提示的人明显更有可能支持在逮捕毒贩和吸毒人员方面采取基于执法的方法(平均边际效应=0.060,p<0.001)。另一方面,收到美国国立卫生研究院提示的人明显更有可能同意执法人员(平均边际效应=0.065,p<0.0001)和临床医生(平均边际效应=0.044,p<0.05)都能够预防药物过量死亡。
这些发现揭示了公众对解决阿片类药物流行方法的看法以及在接触联邦机构措辞时有限的可改变性。这可能为未来旨在维护公共安全同时也为吸毒者提供治疗选择以减少过量用药死亡的研究、实践和/或政策提供参考。