Thongchotchat Vivat, Sutthiboonyapan Pimchanok, Porntaveetus Thantrira, Wiriyakijja Paswach
Center of Excellence in Precision Medicine and Digital Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 26;25(1):1244. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06664-1.
Periodontal diseases remain a global health concern despite being largely preventable. University students represent a key population for targeted interventions, given their transitional life stage and potential for adopting long-term oral health behaviors. This study utilized Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to elucidate associations among periodontal health knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors, using a validated periodontal health literacy questionnaire (ALPHABET) based on the Health Belief Model.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 2,335 Thai undergraduate students at Chulalongkorn University. Participants completed a structured questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics, periodontal health knowledge, and beliefs. Exploratory Factor Analysis identified underlying constructs, while Confirmatory Factor Analysis validated latent variables. SEM with path analysis examined relationships between periodontal knowledge, beliefs, and oral hygiene behaviors, including brushing and flossing frequency.
SEM analysis demonstrated suboptimal model fit but supported theory-driven associations among knowledge, beliefs, and oral hygiene behaviors. Self-efficacy (EFF) strongly predicted flossing (β = 0.439, p < 0.001) and brushing frequency (β = 0.194, p < 0.001). Perceived benefits (BEN) also positively influenced both behaviors, while cues to action (CUE) and perceived susceptibility (SUS) negatively predicted flossing. Perceived severity (SEV) showed a dual effect positively associated with brushing frequency (β = 0.088, p = 0.005) but negatively with brushing technique (β = -0.063, p = 0.017). SEM revealed that perceived benefits, barriers, self-efficacy, and perceived severity significantly predicted brushing behaviors, while flossing frequency was positively associated with self-efficacy and perceived benefits, and negatively associated with perceived susceptibility, cues to action, and symptom knowledge.
This study provides empirical evidence on the associations between periodontal health knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors among university students. Self-efficacy and perceived benefits were key facilitators, while perceived susceptibility, perceived barriers, and cues to action acted as deterrents to preventive oral hygiene behaviors. These findings support tailored interventions to enhance periodontal health literacy and promote sustained adherence to recommended oral hygiene practices.
尽管牙周疾病在很大程度上是可以预防的,但它仍然是一个全球健康问题。鉴于大学生处于过渡性的生活阶段且有养成长期口腔健康行为的潜力,他们是有针对性干预措施的关键人群。本研究利用结构方程模型(SEM),通过基于健康信念模型的经过验证的牙周健康素养问卷(字母表问卷)来阐明牙周健康知识、信念和行为之间的关联。
在朱拉隆功大学对2335名泰国本科生进行了一项横断面研究。参与者完成了一份结构化问卷,评估人口统计学特征、牙周健康知识和信念。探索性因素分析确定了潜在结构,验证性因素分析验证了潜在变量。带有路径分析的结构方程模型研究了牙周知识、信念和口腔卫生行为(包括刷牙和使用牙线的频率)之间的关系。
结构方程模型分析显示模型拟合度欠佳,但支持了知识、信念和口腔卫生行为之间基于理论的关联。自我效能感(EFF)强烈预测使用牙线的频率(β = 0.439,p < 0.001)和刷牙频率(β = 0.194,p < 0.001)。感知到的益处(BEN)也对这两种行为产生积极影响,而行动提示(CUE)和感知到的易感性(SUS)对使用牙线的频率有负面预测作用。感知到的严重性(SEV)显示出双重效应,与刷牙频率呈正相关(β = 0.088,p = 0.005),但与刷牙技巧呈负相关(β = -0.063,p = 0.017)。结构方程模型显示感知到的益处、障碍、自我效能感和感知到的严重性显著预测刷牙行为,而使用牙线的频率与自我效能感和感知到的益处呈正相关,与感知到的易感性、行动提示和症状知识呈负相关。
本研究为大学生牙周健康知识、信念和行为之间的关联提供了实证证据。自我效能感和感知到的益处是关键促进因素,而感知到的易感性、感知到的障碍和行动提示对预防性口腔卫生行为起到了阻碍作用。这些发现支持了量身定制的干预措施,以提高牙周健康素养并促进持续坚持推荐的口腔卫生习惯。