Suppr超能文献

六种用于股骨远端AO/OTA 33C1骨折的内固定方法的生物力学效应:有限元分析

Biomechanical effects of six internal fixation methods for distal femoral AO/OTA 33C1 fractures: finite element analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Jianxiong, Le Jiadi, Wu Zhenghao, Chen Long

机构信息

Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 26;26(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08996-z.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Using finite element analysis, to compare the stress and deformation of six different internal fixation methods for distal femoral fractures to obtain the optimal internal fixation method.

METHODS

Create six groups based on different placement methods and fixation methods: 5-hole lateral plate (SP); 5-hole lateral plate + two medial screws (SP + D); 5-hole lateral plate + one trans-plate screw (SP + O); 5-hole lateral plate + one cross screw (SP + C); 5-hole lateral plate + elastic nail (SP + S); 5-hole lateral plate + medial T-shaped plate (SP + T). Observe the displacement distribution and maximum displacement at the fracture site, and stress distribution on the medial fracture fragment and internal fixation.

RESULTS

After applying the load, mechanical indicators for internal fixation and bone blocks were obtained for all six models by finite element method. The model with a lateral single plate showed max internal fixation stress of 221.75 MPa, which was greater than other models. On the other hand, the model with a 5-hole lateral plate and medial T-shaped plate showed the smallest internal fixation stress (125.74 MPa) and the smallest total femoral deformation (0.99416 mm).

CONCLUSION

The combination of a 5-hole lateral plate and a medial T-shaped plate demonstrated significant biomechanical advantage compared to the other five groups. Although the 5-hole lateral plate model is slightly inferior compared to the 5-hole lateral plate and medial T-shaped plate, it remains an effective and safe fixation solution for AO/OTA 33C1 type fractures.

摘要

目的

采用有限元分析方法,比较六种不同的股骨远端骨折内固定方法的应力和变形情况,以获得最佳内固定方法。

方法

根据不同的放置方法和固定方法创建六组:5孔外侧钢板(SP);5孔外侧钢板+两枚内侧螺钉(SP+D);5孔外侧钢板+一枚经钢板螺钉(SP+O);5孔外侧钢板+一枚交叉螺钉(SP+C);5孔外侧钢板+弹性钉(SP+S);5孔外侧钢板+内侧T形钢板(SP+T)。观察骨折部位的位移分布和最大位移,以及内侧骨折块和内固定物上的应力分布。

结果

加载后,通过有限元方法获得了所有六个模型的内固定和骨块的力学指标。外侧单钢板模型的最大内固定应力为221.75MPa,大于其他模型。另一方面,5孔外侧钢板和内侧T形钢板模型的内固定应力最小(125.74MPa),股骨总变形最小(0.99416mm)。

结论

与其他五组相比,5孔外侧钢板和内侧T形钢板的组合显示出显著的生物力学优势。虽然5孔外侧钢板模型与5孔外侧钢板和内侧T形钢板相比略逊一筹,但它仍然是AO/OTA 33C1型骨折有效且安全的固定解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c1/12297776/f70214922f9d/12891_2025_8996_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验