Garala Kanai, Ramoutar Darryl, Li James, Syed Farhan, Arastu Mateen, Ward Jayne, Patil Sunit
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry. CV2 2DX, United Kingdom.
Injury. 2022 Feb;53(2):634-639. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
Distal femoral fractures occur in patients with osteoporotic bone and also as a consequence of high energy trauma. The recognised treatment options include closed or open reduction of the fracture and fixation using a locking plate or a femoral nail. Both these fixation modalities have some drawbacks. There is a risk of metalwork failure with single lateral locking plates and limited distal fixation with intramedullary nails. Since January 2018, we started using augmented fixation of distal femoral fractures using a combination of a retrograde femoral nail and a lateral locking plate. This study compares the outcomes of single lateral femoral plating (SLP) and combined nail-plate fixation (NPF).
This is a single centre retrospective case control study including all patients who sustained distal femoral fractures (OTA 33-A2, 33-A3, 33-C, 33-V3B and 33-V3D) over the study period. Outcomes for SLP were compared to NPF. The principal outcome measure was fracture union. Secondary outcome measures were reoperation rate, mortality and post-operative weight bearing status.
67 distal femoral fractures were included in the study. 19 patients had peri‑prosthetic fractures. 40 were treated by SLP, 27 were managed with NPF. 23 (58%) patients in the SLP group were given instructions to non-weight bear or Toe touch weight bear for 6 weeks post-surgery compared to 1 (4%) in the NPF group (p = 0.000004). 7 (18%) patients treated with SLP had metalwork failure due to a non-union compared to none treated with NPF (p = 0.04). 11 fractures in the SLP group failed to unite compared to no non-unions in the NPF group (p = 0.01). These differences were magnified when assessing older (>50 years old) patients.
Augmented fixation of distal femoral fractures using a nail plate fixation provided significantly higher union and enabled early weightbearing compared to single plate fixation. We recommend nail plate fixation for the treatment of distal femoral fractures, particularly in osteoporotic fractures.
股骨远端骨折见于骨质疏松患者,也可由高能量创伤所致。公认的治疗选择包括骨折的闭合或切开复位,以及使用锁定钢板或股骨钉进行固定。这两种固定方式均存在一些缺点。单侧锁定钢板存在金属内固定失败的风险,而髓内钉的远端固定有限。自2018年1月起,我们开始采用逆行股骨钉联合外侧锁定钢板对股骨远端骨折进行增强固定。本研究比较了单侧股骨外侧钢板固定(SLP)和钉板联合固定(NPF)的疗效。
这是一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了研究期间所有发生股骨远端骨折(OTA 33-A2、33-A3、33-C、33-V3B和33-V3D)的患者。将SLP的疗效与NPF进行比较。主要结局指标为骨折愈合。次要结局指标为再次手术率、死亡率和术后负重状态。
本研究共纳入67例股骨远端骨折患者。19例为假体周围骨折。40例采用SLP治疗,27例采用NPF治疗。SLP组23例(58%)患者术后接受了6周不负重或足尖触地负重的指导,而NPF组为1例(4%)(p = 0.000004)。SLP治疗的7例(18%)患者因骨不连出现金属内固定失败,而NPF治疗的患者无此情况(p = 0.04)。SLP组有11例骨折未愈合,而NPF组无骨不连病例(p = 0.01)。在评估年龄较大(>50岁)的患者时,这些差异更为明显。
与单钢板固定相比,采用钉板固定对股骨远端骨折进行增强固定可显著提高骨折愈合率,并能使患者早期负重。我们建议采用钉板固定治疗股骨远端骨折,尤其是骨质疏松性骨折。