• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兔腹腔镜胆囊十二指肠吻合术中倒刺缝线与无倒刺缝线的比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison of barbed suture and nonbarbed suture for laparoscopic cholecystoduodenostomy in rabbits: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Li Yuan, Yang Xiaofeng, Zhang Chuang, Zhou Lixia, Sun Chi, Li Suolin

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 215# Heping West Road, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Xingtai People's Hospital, 16# Hongxing Street, Xingtai, Hebei Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 25;15(1):27150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12652-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-12652-w
PMID:40715345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12297385/
Abstract

This study aims to compare the applied efficacy of barbed suture versus non-barbed suture, as well as various stitching techniques, for laparoscopic cholecystoduodenostomy (LCD) in rabbits (imitating infants) to determine the most viable suture option. LCD was performed in a total of 45 male New Zealand white rabbits. The rabbits were equally divided into three groups: the SFB group (single-layer full-thickness running suture using barbed sutures), the SSB group (simple seromuscular layer running suture using barbed sutures) and the PDS group (single-layer full-thickness running suture using PDS sutures). The incidence of anastomotic complications, and histopathological outcomes were evaluated and compared across the groups. The mean duration for LCD was 9.6 ± 1.2 min in the SFB group and 10.8 ± 1.5 min in SSB group, both significantly shorter than the 12.0 ± 0.9 min observed in the PDS group (P < 0.001). Three cases of bile leakage were found in SFB group. H&E staining clearly revealed two cases of ectopic mucosal tissues at the anastomotic muscular layer in the SFB group. The collagen fibers, transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) of anastomotic tissues at all examined time points post-surgery were generally higher in SFB group than in the other two groups, with some statistically significant differences. No significant differences were observed between the SSB group and PDS group. The findings demonstrate that for barbed sutures, full-thickness technique was inferior to PDS sutures due to a higher bile leakage rate, whereas the seromuscular technique achieved difficult to hepatic duct. As a result, barbed sutures are not recommended for use in infants.

摘要

本研究旨在比较倒刺缝线与非倒刺缝线以及各种缝合技术在兔(模拟婴儿)腹腔镜胆囊十二指肠吻合术(LCD)中的应用效果,以确定最可行的缝合选择。总共45只雄性新西兰白兔接受了LCD手术。这些兔子被平均分为三组:SFB组(使用倒刺缝线进行单层全层连续缝合)、SSB组(使用倒刺缝线进行简单浆肌层连续缝合)和PDS组(使用PDS缝线进行单层全层连续缝合)。评估并比较各组吻合口并发症的发生率和组织病理学结果。SFB组LCD的平均持续时间为9.6±1.2分钟,SSB组为10.8±1.5分钟,均显著短于PDS组观察到的12.0±0.9分钟(P<0.001)。SFB组发现3例胆漏。苏木精-伊红染色清楚地显示SFB组吻合肌层有2例异位黏膜组织。术后所有检查时间点吻合组织的胶原纤维、转化生长因子-β1(TGF-β1)、α-平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA)和白细胞介素6(IL-6)在SFB组总体上高于其他两组,有一些统计学上的显著差异。SSB组和PDS组之间未观察到显著差异。研究结果表明,对于倒刺缝线,全层技术由于胆漏率较高而不如PDS缝线,而浆肌层技术难以应用于肝管。因此,不建议在婴儿中使用倒刺缝线。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/c20b58b25fe8/41598_2025_12652_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/0b4d775e4be5/41598_2025_12652_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/79f28bc729b0/41598_2025_12652_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/9d785bed4f87/41598_2025_12652_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/90c9165f1e71/41598_2025_12652_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/2ca907db9595/41598_2025_12652_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/c3d1d6e066bd/41598_2025_12652_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/40e8a9effc69/41598_2025_12652_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/c20b58b25fe8/41598_2025_12652_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/0b4d775e4be5/41598_2025_12652_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/79f28bc729b0/41598_2025_12652_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/9d785bed4f87/41598_2025_12652_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/90c9165f1e71/41598_2025_12652_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/2ca907db9595/41598_2025_12652_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/c3d1d6e066bd/41598_2025_12652_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/40e8a9effc69/41598_2025_12652_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6034/12297385/c20b58b25fe8/41598_2025_12652_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of barbed suture and nonbarbed suture for laparoscopic cholecystoduodenostomy in rabbits: a randomized controlled trial.兔腹腔镜胆囊十二指肠吻合术中倒刺缝线与无倒刺缝线的比较:一项随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 25;15(1):27150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12652-w.
2
Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中连续缝合与间断缝合皮肤的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD010365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2.
3
Comparison of reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic tubal anastomosis using conventional (non-barbed) sutures and barbed sutures.使用传统(无倒刺)缝线和倒刺缝线进行腹腔镜输卵管吻合术后生殖结局的比较。
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-03043-z.
4
Efficacy and safety of V-Loc barbed sutures versus conventional suture techniques in gynecological surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.V-Loc 倒刺缝线与传统缝合技术在妇科手术中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1249-1265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07291-3. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
5
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
6
Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience.针对没有腹腔镜手术经验的外科实习生的腹腔镜手术箱模型培训。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 17;2014(1):CD010479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010479.pub2.
7
Barbed suture in gastro-intestinal surgery: A review with a meta-analysis.胃肠手术中的倒刺缝线:一项Meta分析综述
Surgeon. 2022 Apr;20(2):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
8
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub3.
9
Effectiveness and safety of knotless barbed sutures in cosmetic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.无痕缝合线在美容外科中的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Dec;87:416-429. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.084. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Choledochal cyst.胆总管囊肿。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Jun 1;39(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05483-1.
2
Knotless Barbed versus Conventional Suture for Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.无结倒刺缝线与传统缝线用于剖宫产子宫切口缝合的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Jul;29(7):832-839. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 7.
3
Barbed suture in gastro-intestinal surgery: A review with a meta-analysis.胃肠手术中的倒刺缝线:一项Meta分析综述
Surgeon. 2022 Apr;20(2):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
4
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research.ARRIVE 指南 2.0:报告动物研究的更新指南。
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jul 14;18(7):e3000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
Retrospective comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic pyeloplasty using barbed suture versus nonbarbed suture: A single-center experience.倒刺缝线与非倒刺缝线用于腹腔镜肾盂成形术的疗效回顾性比较:单中心经验
Urol Ann. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):410-413. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_123_15.
6
Successful outcomes in laparoscopic pyeloplasty using knotless self-anchoring barbed suture in children.儿童腹腔镜肾盂成形术中使用无结自固定倒刺缝线的成功结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):660.e1-660.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
Barbed Suture and Gastrointestinal Surgery. A Retrospective Analysis.倒刺缝线与胃肠外科手术。一项回顾性分析。
Open Med (Wars). 2019 Aug 9;14:503-508. doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0055. eCollection 2019.
8
Choledochal cysts: Similarities and differences between Asian and Western countries.胆管囊肿:亚洲国家与西方国家的异同。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 14;25(26):3334-3343. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3334.
9
Long-term anti-inflammatory efficacy in intestinal anastomosis in mice using silver nanoparticle-coated suture.使用银纳米颗粒涂层缝线对小鼠肠吻合术的长期抗炎疗效。
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Dec;52(12):2083-2087. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.026. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
10
Leakage of Hepaticojejunal Anastomosis: Reoperation.肝空肠吻合口漏:再次手术
Visc Med. 2017 Jun;33(3):197-201. doi: 10.1159/000471909. Epub 2017 May 26.