Allred James, Seiler Amber, Lyons Mark, Roberts Paul, Tsiperfal Angela, van Heel Laura, Meijer Catherina, Nicolle Emmanuelle, Lanctin David, Martens Eimo
CV Remote Solutions, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Cardiology and Physiology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Mar 5;6(6):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.02.019. eCollection 2025 Jun.
Managing patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is increasingly complicated with expanding populations and evolving technologies. While the 2023 Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society consensus on management of remote device clinics provides recommendations, the adoption of these practices in real-world practice is unknown.
This survey of device clinic staff characterized the adoption and variability of CIED follow-up practices.
A Delphi panel composed of U.S. and European Union clinical experts guided the research objectives, structure, and content of the survey. Once consensus was reached, the online survey (Qualtrics) was deployed in partnership with HRS through e-mail, social media posts, and at the HRX conference. An available case analysis was performed to handle missing data.
A total of 471 responses were collected from 44 countries, including 310 in the United States, 88 in Europe, and 73 in other regions. Broad representation was achieved with respect to staff role, years of experience, and clinic ownership. Most (71%) respondents reported being aware of the 2023 consensus statement. While the majority (77%-83%, depending on device type) reported using hybrid in-person and remote management for patients with therapeutic CIEDs, 89% to 91% reported scheduling routine office visits at least once per year, depending on device type, respectively. Only 50% of respondents reported a hybrid approach for insertable cardiac monitor patients, with 35% reporting remote-only follow-up.
Variable adoption was found for many practices recommended in the 2023 Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society consensus. Future research should focus on optimal implementation of recommended practices.
随着心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)患者群体的扩大和技术的不断发展,对这些患者的管理日益复杂。虽然2023年心律协会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会/拉丁美洲心律协会关于远程设备诊所管理的共识提供了建议,但这些做法在实际临床实践中的采用情况尚不清楚。
本次对设备诊所工作人员的调查旨在描述CIED随访实践的采用情况和变异性。
由美国和欧盟临床专家组成的德尔菲小组指导了调查的研究目标、结构和内容。达成共识后,通过电子邮件、社交媒体帖子以及在HRX会议上与心律协会合作开展了在线调查(Qualtrics)。采用有效案例分析来处理缺失数据。
共收集到来自44个国家的471份回复,其中美国310份,欧洲88份,其他地区73份。在工作人员角色、工作年限和诊所所有权方面实现了广泛的代表性。大多数(71%)受访者表示知晓2023年的共识声明。虽然大多数(77%-83%,取决于设备类型)报告对治疗性CIED患者采用面对面和远程相结合的管理方式,但分别有89%至91%的受访者报告根据设备类型每年至少安排一次常规门诊就诊。只有50%的受访者报告对可植入心脏监测器患者采用混合方式,35%的受访者报告仅进行远程随访。
发现2023年心律协会/欧洲心律协会/亚太心律协会/拉丁美洲心律协会共识中推荐的许多做法的采用情况存在差异。未来的研究应聚焦于推荐做法的最佳实施。