• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用保留关节囊技术经直接前路入路进行孤立性股骨头与髋臼内衬置换时减少不稳定的情况

Minimizing Instability in Isolated Head and Liner Exchange With the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Capsular-Sparing Technique.

作者信息

Torres-Ramirez Ricardo J, Rodriguez Jose A

机构信息

Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Department, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jul 21;34:101768. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101768. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2025.101768
PMID:40717870
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12296525/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dislocation is a common complication after head and liner exchange. Although surgical approach has been shown to influence instability rate following primary total hip replacement, the same has not been demonstrated for head and liner exchange. The effect of additional soft tissue release to achieve exposure in revision surgery has been implicated in this finding. We have sought to describe and report the effects on postoperative stability of a capsular sparing technique of head and liner exchange with the direct anterior approach, in a single surgeon case series.

METHODS

A retrospective study of all isolated head and liner exchanges with a capsular-sparing direct anterior approach was conducted from 2017 to 2022. Patients without a 2-year follow-up or prior revision on the ipsilateral hip were excluded. A total of 39 hips in 36 patients were identified, with the most common indication for HLE being, liner wear + osteolysis in 44% of patients. The mean follow-up was 29.8 months.

RESULTS

At the latest follow-up there were zero dislocations. Two patients required re-revision for acetabular component loosening, yielding a 95% survivorship free of re-revision at latest follow-up. A 36-mm head was utilized in 65% and a neutral liner in 85% percent of the hips. The average Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement score at latest follow-up was 80.81.

CONCLUSIONS

HLE with the DAA using a capsular sparing technique can yields favorable short-term outcomes with a 0% dislocation rate and a 95% survivorship free of re-revision at 2 years.

摘要

背景

脱位是股骨头与内衬置换术后的常见并发症。尽管手术入路已被证明会影响初次全髋关节置换术后的不稳定率,但对于股骨头与内衬置换术而言,情况并非如此。在翻修手术中,为实现暴露而进行的额外软组织松解的影响与这一发现有关。我们试图在一个单术者病例系列中,描述并报告采用直接前路入路的保留关节囊的股骨头与内衬置换技术对术后稳定性的影响。

方法

对2017年至2022年期间所有采用保留关节囊的直接前路入路进行的单纯股骨头与内衬置换手术进行回顾性研究。排除同侧髋关节无2年随访或既往有翻修史的患者。共确定了36例患者的39髋,股骨头与内衬置换最常见的指征是44%的患者出现内衬磨损+骨溶解。平均随访时间为29.8个月。

结果

在最近一次随访时,脱位率为零。2例患者因髋臼组件松动需要再次翻修,在最近一次随访时,无再次翻修的生存率为95%。65%的髋关节使用了36毫米的股骨头,85%的髋关节使用了中性内衬。在最近一次随访时,髋关节置换的平均髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分是80.81。

结论

采用保留关节囊技术的直接前路入路进行股骨头与内衬置换,可产生良好的短期效果,2年时脱位率为0%,无再次翻修的生存率为95%。

相似文献

1
Minimizing Instability in Isolated Head and Liner Exchange With the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Capsular-Sparing Technique.使用保留关节囊技术经直接前路入路进行孤立性股骨头与髋臼内衬置换时减少不稳定的情况
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jul 21;34:101768. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101768. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3
Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜时代的髋关节脱位手术具有高存活率,并改善了复杂型股骨髋臼撞击症患者的报告结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1671-1682. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003032. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
4
What Is the Cumulative Incidence of Femoral Stem Revision and Stem Complication in Cemented and Uncemented Hip Arthroplasty for Proximal Femoral Metastatic Bone Disease?对于股骨近端转移性骨病,骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节置换术中股骨柄翻修及柄并发症的累积发生率是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003541.
5
Isolated Liner Exchange and Bone Grafting for the Management of Periacetabular Osteolysis in Well-Fixed Cups with an Intact Locking Mechanism at Short-Term to Medium-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.孤立性衬垫置换与植骨治疗中期随访时锁定机制完整的固定良好髋臼杯周围骨溶解:一项系统评价
HSS J. 2024 Nov;20(4):567-576. doi: 10.1177/15563316231189736. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
6
No Difference in Revision Rates and High Survival Rates in Large-head Metal-on-metal THA Versus Metal-on-polyethylene THA: Long-term Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.大头金属对金属全髋关节置换术与金属对聚乙烯全髋关节置换术的翻修率无差异且生存率高:一项随机对照试验的长期结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1173-1182. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002924. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
7
Composite Reconstruction With Irradiated Autograft Plus Total Hip Replacement After Type II Pelvic Resections for Tumors Is Feasible but Fraught With Complications.肿瘤Ⅱ型骨盆切除术后采用同种异体骨移植加全髋关节置换术进行复合重建是可行的,但并发症多。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1825-1835. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003097. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
Cementing Liners Into Well-Fixed Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Mean 7.7-Year Follow-Up.在翻修全髋关节置换术中将骨水泥内衬固定到牢固的髋臼组件中:平均7.7年随访
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.07.047.
9
The Subscapularis-Sparing Windowed Anterior Technique (SWAT) for Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.用于解剖型全肩关节置换术的保留肩胛下肌的开窗前入路技术(SWAT)
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Jul 17;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.24.00007. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
10
Polyethylene liner cementation into a well-fixed metal acetabular shell for the management of periacetabular osteolysis: a systematic review.聚乙烯衬垫骨水泥固定于固定良好的金属髋臼壳治疗髋臼周围骨溶解:系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Dec;32(8):1459-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03130-w. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Through an Anterior Approach: Survivorship and Risk Factors for Re-Revision.经前路入路的无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术:再翻修的生存率及危险因素
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9):2341-2345. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.025. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
2
Contribution of the Medial Iliofemoral Ligament to Hip Stability After Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach.经直接前入路行全髋关节置换术后,股白交通支对髋关节稳定性的贡献。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S1):S266-S271. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.044. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Is Retention of the Acetabular Component at Revision Surgery a Long-Term Solution?髋臼组件在翻修手术中的保留是一种长期解决方案吗?
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Aug 26;23:101197. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101197. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
A low dislocation rate after revision total hip arthroplasty performed through the anterior approach.经前路行翻修全髋关节置换术后脱位率较低。
Arthroplasty. 2023 Jan 5;5(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00159-y.
5
Outcomes of isolated head-liner exchange versus full acetabular component revision in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty.在无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中,单纯头衬置换与全髋臼组件翻修的结果比较。
Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):716-726. doi: 10.1177/11207000221092127. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
6
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at One Year Postoperatively in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.术后 1 年无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8S):S954-S957. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.044. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
7
Direct Anterior Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Lowers the Risk of Dislocation Compared to the Posterior Approach: A Single Institution Experience.直接前入路与后入路初次全髋关节置换术的脱位风险比较:单中心经验。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Mar;37(3):495-500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.11.011. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
Does Approach Influence the Dislocation Rate Following Head and Liner Exchange in Revision Hip Arthroplasty?头臼置换翻修术后,入路方式是否影响假体脱位率?
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):336-341. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
9
Do patient-reported outcome measures improve after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty?无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术后患者报告的结局指标会改善吗?
Hip Int. 2023 Mar;33(2):267-279. doi: 10.1177/11207000211036320. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
10
High risk of hip dislocation following polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty-is cup revision necessary?全髋关节置换术后行聚乙烯衬垫翻修术髋关节脱位风险高——是否需要行髋臼翻修术?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1837-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03603-3. Epub 2020 Sep 19.