Yoo Seungtae, Jin Sang Wook, Kim Jung Lim, Shin Jonghoon, Lee Seung Uk, Kim EunAh, Lee Jiwon, Song Giltae, Lee Jiwoong
Department of Information Convergence Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
Department of Ophthalmology, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 28;45(1):317. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03672-6.
To effectively represent central visual field (VF) loss for individual patients using a hybrid unsupervised approach.
We obtained 7927 10-2 VF test data from 3328 patients in 5 hospitals. We propose a hybrid approach that combines archetypal analysis (AA) and fuzzy c-means (FCM) to identify characteristic patterns and decompose 10-2 VF without loss. To compare the performance between hybrid approach using FCM and AA single approach, mean deviation (MD) change prediction was performed through supervised learning using decomposition coefficient changes and a linear mixed-effects model was built to investigate the relationship between the MD slope and baseline decomposition coefficients.
We identified 10 representative archetypes for 10-2 VF test. The hybrid approach using FCM outperformed the AA single approach in predicting MD change, achieving lower mean squared error and higher pearson correlation coefficient (all P ≤ 0.039). According to the linear mixed-effects model, the hybrid approach using FCM provides a better fit for predicting MD slope compared to the AA single approach, as reflected by lower akaike information criterion (AIC) and bayesian information criterion (BIC) scores (AIC decrease: 20.31, BIC decrease: 13.33). Eyes with baseline VFs with more inferior and both hemifield loss and less intact field and nearly total loss were associated with faster central VF progression (all P ≤ 0.026).
A hybrid approach combining AA and FCM to analyze 10-2 VF can visualize central VF tests in characteristic patterns and enhance prediction of central VF progression with minimized projection loss decomposition compared with AA single approach.
使用混合无监督方法有效呈现个体患者的中心视野(VF)损失。
我们从5家医院的3328名患者中获取了7927份10-2 VF测试数据。我们提出了一种结合原型分析(AA)和模糊c均值(FCM)的混合方法,以识别特征模式并无损分解10-2 VF。为了比较使用FCM的混合方法与AA单一方法之间的性能,通过使用分解系数变化的监督学习进行平均偏差(MD)变化预测,并建立线性混合效应模型来研究MD斜率与基线分解系数之间的关系。
我们为10-2 VF测试确定了10个代表性原型。在预测MD变化方面,使用FCM的混合方法优于AA单一方法,实现了更低的均方误差和更高的皮尔逊相关系数(所有P≤0.039)。根据线性混合效应模型,与AA单一方法相比,使用FCM的混合方法在预测MD斜率方面提供了更好的拟合,这通过更低的赤池信息准则(AIC)和贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)得分反映出来(AIC降低:20.31,BIC降低:13.33)。基线VF在下半部分、双侧视野损失更多、完整视野更少且几乎完全损失的眼睛与更快的中心VF进展相关(所有P≤0.026)。
结合AA和FCM分析10-2 VF的混合方法可以以特征模式可视化中心VF测试,并与AA单一方法相比,通过最小化投影损失分解增强对中心VF进展的预测。