Kilburn Kelly, Meltzer Martin I, Jeon Seonghye, Adhikari Bishwa B, Lindsey Nicole, Hills Susan L, Staples J Erin
National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Jul 28;10(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01194-x.
A live attenuated chikungunya vaccine, IXCHIQ, was approved in the United States in 2023 for use in adults. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of two different vaccination strategies, routine and outbreak vaccination, for persons aged ≥18 years living in U.S. territories with previous transmission. We included the entire population of impacted U.S. territories and assumed one chikungunya outbreak occurring during a 30-year time horizon. We estimated that routine vaccination would avert 90% of the disease burden and cost $498 million (16% savings compared with no vaccination) while outbreak vaccination would avert 67% of the disease burden and cost $552 million (6% savings). Both strategies were more costly than no vaccination from the healthcare payer perspective. Routine vaccination was cost-saving for all outcomes assessed from a societal perspective. Outbreak vaccination was cost-saving for averted symptomatic cases but cost from $5 [95% CI: cost savings, $191] per chronic joint pain case averted to $373,054 [95% CI: $172,643, $573,464] per death averted.
一种减毒活基孔肯雅疫苗IXCHIQ于2023年在美国获批用于成人。我们评估了两种不同的疫苗接种策略(常规接种和疫情期间接种)对居住在美国曾有过基孔肯雅热传播的属地、年龄≥18岁人群的成本效益。我们纳入了受影响的美国属地的全部人口,并假设在30年时间范围内发生一次基孔肯雅热疫情。我们估计,常规接种可避免90%的疾病负担,成本为4.98亿美元(与未接种相比节省16%),而疫情期间接种可避免67%的疾病负担,成本为5.52亿美元(节省6%)。从医疗保健支付方的角度来看,这两种策略都比不接种疫苗成本更高。从社会角度评估的所有结果来看,常规接种都节省了成本。疫情期间接种对于避免出现症状性病例节省了成本,但对于每例避免的慢性关节疼痛病例,成本从5美元[95%置信区间:节省成本,191美元]到每例避免的死亡病例373,054美元[95%置信区间:172,643美元,573,464美元]不等。