Chokchaitanasin Ratima, Vongkulsiri Sritatath, Choontanom Raveewan
Department of Ophthalmology, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ophthalmology Unit, Wanon Niwat Hospital, Sakon Nakhon, Thailand.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07418-x.
The use of simulators for ophthalmology training is growing globally. However, all developed simulators have certain limits based on different circumstances. The study aims to evaluate training performance and student satisfaction of the new refractive adjustment simulator "ICEyeModel" compared with a traditional simulator for direct ophthalmoscopy training among medical students.
This constitutes a comparative, randomised, cross-over study. Our study enrolled 50 participants from a 6-year medical student training programme at Phramongkutklao Hospital. They underwent a refresher lecture on primary direct ophthalmoscopy use and a short course review of common retinal diseases. They were randomised into two training sequence groups: Training sequence 1 started with a traditional film photograph simulator called Eye Retinopathy Trainer (developed by Adam, Rouilly Co., Sittingbourne, UK) followed by the ICEyeModel. Training Sequence 2 started with the ICEyeModel, followed by a traditional simulator. Participants in both groups completed the fundoscopic description tests and satisfaction questionnaires immediately following each simulator training session.
On an 18-point prospective rubrics scale, medical students trained with ICEyeModel achieved significantly higher fundoscopic examination scores (14.42 ± 2.34) compared to those trained with traditional simulators (11.30 ± 2.64), with p < 0.001. For the ICEyeModel, 86% of the participants can correctly adjust the direct ophthalmoscope power match to the refractive state of the trial lens placed in the simulator. The ICEyeModel has a higher satisfaction score regarding picture quality, enhancing motivation and confidence than a traditional simulator.
In comparison with the Eye Retinopathy Trainer, the ICEyeModel significantly enhanced performance with increased satisfaction and self-confidence in simulated direct ophthalmoscopy training. Although these improvements were observed in a simulation setting and do not necessarily translate to superior performance in patient examinations, our findings suggest that the ICEyeModel may offer a promising alternative for training with direct ophthalmoscopes, indirect ophthalmoscopes, and retinoscopes in clinical settings.
眼科训练模拟器在全球范围内的使用正在增加。然而,所有已开发的模拟器基于不同情况都有一定的局限性。本研究旨在评估新型屈光调节模拟器“ICEyeModel”与传统直接检眼镜训练模拟器相比,在医学生中的训练表现和学生满意度。
这是一项比较性、随机、交叉研究。我们的研究招募了来自诗里蒙坤贴医院6年制医学生培训项目的50名参与者。他们接受了关于初级直接检眼镜使用的复习讲座以及常见视网膜疾病的短期课程复习。他们被随机分为两个训练序列组:训练序列1先使用名为Eye Retinopathy Trainer(由英国锡廷伯恩的Adam, Rouilly公司开发)的传统胶片照片模拟器,然后使用ICEyeModel。训练序列2先使用ICEyeModel,然后使用传统模拟器。两组参与者在每次模拟器训练课程结束后立即完成眼底描述测试和满意度问卷。
在18分的前瞻性评分量表上,使用ICEyeModel训练的医学生眼底检查得分(14.42±2.34)显著高于使用传统模拟器训练的学生(11.30±2.64),p<0.001。对于ICEyeModel,86%的参与者能够正确将直接检眼镜的屈光度调节与模拟器中放置的试验镜片的屈光状态相匹配。与传统模拟器相比,ICEyeModel在图像质量、增强动机和信心方面的满意度得分更高。
与Eye Retinopathy Trainer相比,ICEyeModel在模拟直接检眼镜训练中显著提高了表现,同时提高了满意度和自信心。尽管这些改进是在模拟环境中观察到的,不一定能转化为在患者检查中的卓越表现,但我们的研究结果表明,ICEyeModel可能为临床环境中直接检眼镜、间接检眼镜和视网膜镜的训练提供一个有前景的替代方案。