Glazer Ciprian, Oravitan Mihaela, Pantea Corina, Almajan-Guta Bogdan, Jurjiu Nicolae-Adrian, Marghitas Mihai Petru, Avram Claudiu, Stanila Alexandra Mihaela
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, West University of Timisoara, 300223 Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Mechanics and Strength of Materials, Politehnica University of Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 18;12(7):777. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070777.
Three-dimensional (3D) scanning is increasingly utilized in medical practice, from orthotics to surgical planning. However, traditional hand measurement techniques remain inconsistent and prone to human error and are often time-consuming. This research evaluates the practicality of a commercial 3D scanning method by comparing the accuracy of scans conducted by two user groups. This study evaluated the following two groups: an experimental group (n = 45) and a control group (n = 42). A total of 261 hand scans were captured using the Structure Sensor Pro 3D scanner for iPad (Structure, Boulder, CO, USA). The scans were then evaluated using Meshmixer software (version 3.5.474), analyzing key parameters, such as surface area, volume, number of vertices, and triangles, etc. Furthermore, a digital literacy test and a user experience survey were conducted to support a more comprehensive evaluation of participant performance within the study. The experimental group outperformed the control group on all measured parameters, including surface area, volume, vertices, triangle, and gap count, with large effect sizes observed. User experience data revealed that participants in the experimental group rated the 3D scanner significantly higher across all dimensions, particularly in ease of use, excitement, supportiveness, and practicality. A short 15 min training session can promote scan reliability, demonstrating that even minimal instruction improves users' proficiency in 3D scanning, fundamental for supporting clinical accuracy in diagnosis, surgical planning, and personalized device manufacturing.
从矫形器到手术规划,三维(3D)扫描在医学实践中的应用越来越广泛。然而,传统的手工测量技术仍然存在不一致性,容易出现人为误差,而且往往耗时较长。本研究通过比较两个用户组进行扫描的准确性,评估了一种商用3D扫描方法的实用性。本研究评估了以下两组:实验组(n = 45)和对照组(n = 42)。使用适用于iPad的Structure Sensor Pro 3D扫描仪(美国科罗拉多州博尔德市的Structure公司)共采集了261次手部扫描数据。然后使用Meshmixer软件(版本3.5.474)对扫描数据进行评估,分析关键参数,如表面积、体积、顶点数量和三角形数量等。此外还进行了数字素养测试和用户体验调查以支持对研究中参与者表现进行更全面的评估。在所有测量参数上,包括表面积、体积、顶点数量、三角形数量和间隙计数等方面,实验组的表现均优于对照组,且效应量较大。用户体验数据显示,实验组的参与者在所有维度上对3D扫描仪的评分都明显更高,尤其是在易用性、趣味性、支持性和实用性方面。15分钟的简短培训课程可以提高扫描的可靠性,这表明即使是最少的指导也能提高用户在3D扫描方面的熟练程度,而这对于支持临床诊断、手术规划和个性化设备制造的准确性至关重要。