Tang Yilin, Wang Xiaodong, Li Ming, Jin Liang
Radiology Department, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Radiology Department, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;12(7):785. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12070785.
To employ artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically measure bone mineral density (BMD) and intramuscular fat in computed tomography (CT) images of patients with fractures and explore the association between these parameters and fracture healing. This retrospective study included patients who underwent baseline CT scans for rib fracture diagnosis and follow-up CT scans for fracture healing assessment at our hospital between 2012 and 2023. The volumetric BMD of the entire first lumbar vertebra (L1) and the paraspinal intramuscular fat area (PIFA) at the midsection of L1 in the baseline CT were extracted using AI. The primary outcomes, including callus formation, volume increase, and poor healing, and logistic regression were used to analyze the relationships between BMD and PIFA with primary outcomes. Overall, 297 fractures from 53 patients (24 males; mean age: 53.83 ± 10.86 years) were included in this study. In multivariate regression analysis, a 1 standard deviation (SD) decrease in BMD was identified as an independent prognostic factor for reduced callus formation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.97), diminished volume increase (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.96), and elevated poor fracture healing at follow-up (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.38-3.13). Similarly, a 1 SD increase in PIFA was an independent prognostic factor for reduced callus formation (OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.16-0.37), diminished volume increase (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.23-0.49), and elevated poor fracture healing at follow-up (OR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.50-2.93). Therefore, a model combining BMD, PIFA, and clinical characteristics significantly outperformed a model that included only clinical characteristics in predicting callus formation, volume increase, and poor fracture healing, with areas under the curve of 0.790, 0.749, and 0.701, respectively (all < 0.001). BMD and PIFA can be used as early predictors of fracture healing outcomes and can help clinicians select appropriate interventions to prevent poor healing.
利用人工智能(AI)自动测量骨折患者计算机断层扫描(CT)图像中的骨密度(BMD)和肌内脂肪,并探讨这些参数与骨折愈合之间的关联。这项回顾性研究纳入了2012年至2023年期间在我院接受基线CT扫描以诊断肋骨骨折以及接受随访CT扫描以评估骨折愈合情况的患者。使用AI提取基线CT中整个第一腰椎(L1)的体积骨密度和L1中部的椎旁肌内脂肪面积(PIFA)。主要结局包括骨痂形成、体积增加和愈合不良,并采用逻辑回归分析骨密度和PIFA与主要结局之间的关系。本研究共纳入了53例患者(24例男性;平均年龄:53.83±10.86岁)的297处骨折。在多变量回归分析中,骨密度降低1个标准差(SD)被确定为骨痂形成减少(比值比[OR]=0.70,95%置信区间[CI]=0.50-0.97)、体积增加减少(OR=0.70,95%CI=0.51-0.96)以及随访时骨折愈合不良增加(OR=2.08,95%CI=1.38-3.13)的独立预后因素。同样,PIFA增加1个SD是骨痂形成减少(OR=0.24,95%CI=0.16-0.37)、体积增加减少(OR=0.33,95%CI=0.23-0.49)以及随访时骨折愈合不良增加(OR=2.09,95%CI=1.50-2.93)的独立预后因素。因此,在预测骨痂形成、体积增加和骨折愈合不良方面,结合骨密度、PIFA和临床特征的模型显著优于仅包含临床特征的模型,其曲线下面积分别为0.790、0.749和0.701(均P<0.001)。骨密度和PIFA可作为骨折愈合结局的早期预测指标,并可帮助临床医生选择合适的干预措施以预防愈合不良。