Alharthi Sarah Yahya, Alsheikh Sarah Abdulaziz, Almousa Dawood Salman, Alsedrah Saud Samer A, Alshammari Nouf Mohammed, Elsayed Mariam Mostafa, AlShamrani Rahaf Ali Hamed, Bellahwal Mohammed Ahmed Yaslam, Alnwiji Abdulrahman, Albar Raed A, Mohamed Ayman M A
College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia.
College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, P.O. Box 71666, Riyadh 11597, Saudi Arabia.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;15(14):1780. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141780.
Intracerebral hemorrhage management presents clinicians with a significant therapeutic challenge. Maintaining antiplatelet therapy potentially increases the risk of recurrent bleeding, while discontinuation heightens susceptibility to ischemic stroke, particularly during the critical first month after hemorrhage. In contemporary practice, physicians demonstrate considerable hesitancy regarding early antiplatelet reinitiation, complicated by the absence of clear evidence-based treatment guidelines. This meta-analysis assesses the safety of early antiplatelet resumption following ICH. : We conducted a systematic review by searching Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Cochrane Library from inception to April 2025. Articles were independently screened and data extracted by two reviewers who also assessed study quality. The inclusion criteria are enrollment of adults (≥18 years) with imaging-confirmed intracerebral hemorrhage surviving >24 h, comparing early vs. delayed or withheld antiplatelet therapy. Randomized trials underwent separate evaluation using Cochrane's Risk of Bias. Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.2), with categorical outcomes pooled as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was established at < 0.05. The evidence is limited by the availability of few RCTs, variable antiplatelet regiments, male predominance, and other confounding factors. The review was registered in SFO. Our meta-analysis included 10 studies (8 observational, 2 RCTs) with 5554 patients. Early antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced recurrent intracerebral hemorrhage by 46% (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.78, = 0.001). All-cause mortality showed a non-significant difference (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.65-1.01, = 0.06). No significant differences were found for ischemic stroke (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.60-1.63, = 0.96), major hemorrhagic events (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.49-1.13, = 0.17), or ischemic vascular outcomes (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.49-1.02, = 0.60). Our meta-analysis reveals that early antiplatelet therapy following intracerebral hemorrhage significantly reduces recurrent hemorrhagic events (46% reduction) without increasing major ischemic or hemorrhagic complications.
脑出血的管理给临床医生带来了重大的治疗挑战。维持抗血小板治疗可能会增加再次出血的风险,而停药则会增加缺血性中风的易感性,尤其是在出血后的关键第一个月内。在当代实践中,由于缺乏明确的循证治疗指南,医生对于早期重新开始抗血小板治疗表现出相当大的犹豫。这项荟萃分析评估了脑出血后早期恢复抗血小板治疗的安全性。我们通过检索科学网、Scopus、PubMed和Cochrane图书馆从创刊到2025年4月进行了系统综述。文章由两位评审员独立筛选并提取数据,他们还评估了研究质量。纳入标准为纳入年龄≥18岁、经影像学证实脑出血存活超过24小时的成年人,比较早期与延迟或停用抗血小板治疗。随机试验使用Cochrane偏倚风险进行单独评估。使用R软件(版本4.4.2)进行统计分析,分类结果合并为风险比(RRs)及95%置信区间。统计学显著性设定为<0.05。证据受到以下因素限制:随机对照试验数量少、抗血小板治疗方案多样、男性占主导以及其他混杂因素。该综述已在SFO注册。我们的荟萃分析纳入了10项研究(8项观察性研究、2项随机对照试验),共5554例患者。早期抗血小板治疗显著降低了46%的复发性脑出血(RR 0.54,95% CI 0.37 - 0.78,P = 0.001)。全因死亡率无显著差异(RR 0.81,95% CI 0.65 - 1.01,P = 0.06)。缺血性中风(RR 0.99,95% CI 0.60 - 1.63,P = 0.96)、重大出血事件(RR 0.75,95% CI 0.49 - 1.13,P = 0.17)或缺血性血管结局(RR 0.71,95% CI 0.49 - 1.02,P = 0.60)均未发现显著差异。我们的荟萃分析表明,脑出血后早期抗血小板治疗可显著降低复发性出血事件(降低46%),且不会增加重大缺血或出血并发症。