Suppr超能文献

改善丁型肝炎病毒感染的病毒学监测:在接受布立维地治疗的患者中对博斯弗尔和阿尔托斯塔检测方法进行的概念验证比较研究

Improving Virological Monitoring of HDV Infection: A Proof-of-Concept Comparative Study of Bosphore and AltoStar Assays in Patients Treated with Bulevirtide.

作者信息

Zulian Verdiana, Taibi Chiara, Coppola Antonio, Bibbò Angela, Federici Luigi, De Sanctis Martina, Pauciullo Silvia, D'Offizi Gianpiero, Biliotti Elisa, McPhee Fiona, Garbuglia Anna Rosa

机构信息

Virology Laboratory, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.

Infectious Diseases and Hepatology Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases Lazzaro Spallanzani IRCCS, 00149 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 26;13(7):1564. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071564.

Abstract

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) infection is associated with severe hepatic complications and rapid progression towards liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Accurate measurement of HDV RNA is critical for monitoring therapeutic responses, especially during treatment with novel therapies such as bulevirtide (BLV). This study compared the analytical performance of two HDV RNA quantification assays, Bosphore (Anatolia) and AltoStar (Altona), focusing on their sensitivity, specificity, and potential implications for clinical management. Sixty-one clinical samples from twenty-four patients, including fifteen HDV-infected patients receiving BLV treatment and nine controls, were tested using each assay. Of 30 samples identified as HDV-negative by the Bosphore assay, 17 (56.7%) were HDV-positive with AltoStar, demonstrating the superior sensitivity ( < 0.0001) of the latter assay. Quantitative analyses revealed consistently higher viral load measurements with AltoStar compared to Bosphore, with a difference of 1.23 Log IU/mL and a moderate correlation (r = 0.7385) between assays. Each assay demonstrated a high specificity, with no false positives detected among control samples. However, our findings suggest that differences in assay sensitivity could impact the evaluation of virological response, highlighting the risk of false-negative results in chronically HDV-infected patients with low-level viremia. This emphasizes the need for careful assay selection to accurately monitor treatment outcomes.

摘要

丁型肝炎病毒(HDV)感染与严重的肝脏并发症以及向肝硬化和肝细胞癌的快速进展相关。准确测量HDV RNA对于监测治疗反应至关重要,尤其是在用新型疗法(如布列韦肽(BLV))治疗期间。本研究比较了两种HDV RNA定量检测方法Bosphore(安纳托利亚)和AltoStar(阿尔托纳)的分析性能,重点关注它们的敏感性、特异性以及对临床管理的潜在影响。使用每种检测方法对来自24名患者的61份临床样本进行了检测,其中包括15名接受BLV治疗的HDV感染患者和9名对照。在Bosphore检测中被鉴定为HDV阴性的30份样本中,有17份(56.7%)通过AltoStar检测为HDV阳性,这表明后者检测方法具有更高的敏感性(<0.0001)。定量分析显示,与Bosphore相比,AltoStar的病毒载量测量结果始终更高,两种检测方法之间的差异为1.23 Log IU/mL,且具有中等相关性(r = 0.7385)。每种检测方法都显示出高特异性,在对照样本中未检测到假阳性。然而,我们的研究结果表明,检测方法敏感性的差异可能会影响病毒学反应的评估,突出了慢性HDV感染且病毒血症水平较低的患者出现假阴性结果的风险。这强调了仔细选择检测方法以准确监测治疗结果的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8eb/12292241/fff491068a54/biomedicines-13-01564-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验