Horisaki Ken, Yoshikawa Shusuke, Omata Wataru, Tsutsumida Arata, Kiyohara Yoshio
Department of Dermatology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.
Department of Dermatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;17(14):2299. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142299.
: Nivolumab is a key therapy for advanced-stage melanoma; however, limited data are available from Asian populations comparing the efficacy and side effects of four dosing regimens: 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (3mg/kgQ2W), 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks (2mg/kgQ3W), 240 mg every 2 weeks (240mgQ2W), and 480 mg every 4 weeks (480mgQ4W). This retrospective study evaluated Japanese patients with advanced melanoma treated with various nivolumab regimens to assess the impact of dosing interval and dosage on treatment efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). : We reviewed the records of 153 participants with stage IV melanoma who received nivolumab monotherapy between February 2012 and December 2024 at Shizuoka Cancer Center. Patients were categorized by nivolumab regimen, dosing interval, and dose per body weight. We then compared treatment efficacy and incidence of irAEs across groups. : No significant differences were observed in objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), or irAE incidence between the 240mgQ2W and 480mgQ4W groups. Similar results were observed in the 3mg/kgQ2W and 2mg/kgQ3W groups. However, participants who received nivolumab within 3 weeks exhibited a significantly higher ORR than those who received nivolumab more than 3 weeks. No significant differences were found in PFS or OS. : The administration of nivolumab at shorter intervals may provide short-term benefits in Japanese patients with advanced melanoma. However, long-term efficacy and side effects did not differ significantly across the studied nivolumab regimens.
纳武利尤单抗是晚期黑色素瘤的关键治疗药物;然而,关于亚洲人群比较四种给药方案(每2周3mg/kg[3mg/kgQ2W]、每3周2mg/kg[2mg/kgQ3W]、每2周240mg[240mgQ2W]和每4周480mg[480mgQ4W])的疗效和副作用的数据有限。这项回顾性研究评估了接受各种纳武利尤单抗方案治疗的日本晚期黑色素瘤患者,以评估给药间隔和剂量对治疗疗效及免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的影响。
我们回顾了2012年2月至2024年12月在静冈癌症中心接受纳武利尤单抗单药治疗的153例IV期黑色素瘤参与者的记录。患者按纳武利尤单抗方案、给药间隔和每体重剂量进行分类。然后我们比较了各组的治疗疗效和irAEs发生率。
在240mgQ2W组和480mgQ4W组之间,客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)或irAE发生率均未观察到显著差异。在3mg/kgQ2W组和2mg/kgQ3W组也观察到类似结果。然而,在3周内接受纳武利尤单抗治疗的参与者的ORR显著高于接受纳武利尤单抗治疗超过3周的参与者。在PFS或OS方面未发现显著差异。
在日本晚期黑色素瘤患者中,更短间隔给药纳武利尤单抗可能带来短期益处。然而,在所研究的纳武利尤单抗方案中,长期疗效和副作用没有显著差异。