Astarita Anna, Mingrone Giulia, Airale Lorenzo, Colomba Anna, Catarinella Cinzia, Cesareo Marco, Vallelonga Fabrizio, Paladino Arianna, Bruno Giulia, Leone Dario, Gay Francesca, Bringhen Sara, Veglio Franco, Milan Alberto
Division of Internal Medicine, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Division of Internal Medicine, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 15;17(14):2353. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142353.
Despite the inference about the cardiotoxicity induced by Carfilzomib, no validated risk prediction models for adverse cardiovascular events in a real-life population are available.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the risk stratification score for Carfilzomib-induced cardiotoxicity of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
This is a prospective, real-world study including MM patients consecutively enrolled prior to starting Carfilzomib, divided into levels of risk according to the HFA-ICOS proforma.
Of 169 patients, 11.8% were classified as 'low risk', 38.5% as 'medium risk', 45.6% as 'high risk' and 4.1% as 'very high risk' at baseline. A total of 89 (52.7%) patients experienced one of the following events: 36 (21.3%) had at least one cardiovascular event and 77 (45.6%) had almost one hypertension-related event. No significant differences were observed for the incidence of any cardiovascular events between the different levels of risk ( > 0.05), even considering the HFA-ICOS score as a continuous variable. The integration of the score with the baseline systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity enhanced the accuracy of the score (AUC 0.557 vs. 0.736).
The HFA-ICOS score did not discriminate between patients at low, medium and high risk, showing a limited discriminatory power in predicting the risk of events in our population. The integration of other parameters in the HFA-ICOS score, such as systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity, improved the performance of the score.
尽管有关于卡非佐米引起心脏毒性的推断,但尚无针对现实生活人群中不良心血管事件的经过验证的风险预测模型。
本研究旨在评估欧洲心脏病学会心力衰竭协会和国际心脏肿瘤学会(HFA-ICOS)的卡非佐米诱导心脏毒性风险分层评分在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中的性能。
这是一项前瞻性的现实世界研究,纳入了在开始使用卡非佐米之前连续入组的MM患者,根据HFA-ICOS表格分为不同风险水平。
在169例患者中,基线时11.8%被分类为“低风险”,38.5%为“中风险”,45.6%为“高风险”,4.1%为“极高风险”。共有89例(52.7%)患者发生了以下事件之一:36例(21.3%)发生了至少一次心血管事件,77例(45.6%)发生了至少一次高血压相关事件。即使将HFA-ICOS评分视为连续变量,不同风险水平之间任何心血管事件的发生率也未观察到显著差异(>0.05)。将该评分与基线收缩压和脉搏波速度相结合可提高评分的准确性(AUC分别为0.557和0.736)。
HFA-ICOS评分在低、中、高风险患者之间没有区分能力,在预测我们研究人群中事件风险方面显示出有限的区分能力。将其他参数(如收缩压和脉搏波速度)纳入HFA-ICOS评分可提高该评分的性能。