Fang Qiang, Li Yinmei
School of Foreign Studies, Yanshan University, No. 438 West Hebei Avenue, Qinhuangdao 066004, China.
School of Humanities and Law, North China University of Technology, No. 5 Jinyuanzhuang Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100144, China.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;15(7):912. doi: 10.3390/bs15070912.
Evidentiality is a linguistic category whose primary meaning is the source of information, which is generally divided into firsthand perception, hearsay, and inference. Evidential markers are the linguistic devices that indicate information sources. While considerable studies have revealed that evidential markers have an effect on the perceived speaker's certainty, no comparison on such an effect has been carried out in subjective and objective sentences. Moreover, with evidential markers and evidence strength both influencing the speaker's certainty, their relationship when used in collocation has not been investigated. This article examined, in two experiments, the intertwinement of inferential markers, subjectivity, and evidence strength in affecting the perceived speaker's certainty in Chinese. Participants were asked to judge the perceived speaker's certainty in sentences with and without inferential markers and also in sentences with different degrees of evidence strength in subjective and objective conditions. Our results revealed that (i) subjective evaluations are conceived with a lower degree of the speaker's certainty than objective sentences; (ii) Chinese evidential markers change the perceived speaker's certainty in subjective and objective sentences; and (iii) evidence strength plays a role in subjective evaluations but not in objective sentences. Our results show the participants reasoning the subjective evaluation themselves based on the evidence, but adopting the speaker's evaluation on the objective situations. Overall, our study supported that inferential markers significantly lowered the perceived speaker's certainty, and reported the different effects of evidence strength in objective sentences and subjective evaluations.
证据性是一种语言范畴,其主要意义是信息来源,通常分为第一手感知、传闻和推断。证据标记是指示信息来源的语言手段。虽然大量研究表明证据标记会影响对说话者确定性的感知,但尚未对主观句和客观句中的这种影响进行比较。此外,由于证据标记和证据强度都会影响说话者的确定性,它们搭配使用时的关系尚未得到研究。本文通过两个实验,考察了汉语中推断标记、主观性和证据强度在影响对说话者确定性感知方面的交织情况。要求参与者判断有和没有推断标记的句子以及在主观和客观条件下具有不同证据强度的句子中说话者的确定性感知。我们的结果表明:(i)主观评价中对说话者确定性的感知程度低于客观句;(ii)汉语证据标记会改变主观句和客观句中说话者的确定性感知;(iii)证据强度在主观评价中起作用,但在客观句中不起作用。我们的结果表明,参与者根据证据自行推理主观评价,但在客观情况下采用说话者的评价。总体而言,我们的研究支持推断标记会显著降低说话者的确定性感知,并报告了证据强度在客观句和主观评价中的不同影响。