Ďurajková Barbora, Veselý Petr, Tuf Ivan Hadrián
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Insects. 2025 Jun 25;16(7):662. doi: 10.3390/insects16070662.
The ability of terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Isopoda: Oniscidea) to protect themselves effectively from predation by birds has never been tested. They are equipped with glands producing chemical substances; moreover, some species show conspicuous coloration, which might suffice as an aposematic signal. We evaluated the palatability of isopods to birds. We tested the responses of captured in the wild (and thus possessing some experience with common native isopod species) to the following isopod species: (native, inconspicuous), (native, moderately conspicuous), (non-native, moderately conspicuous), (native, conspicuous), and (non-native, conspicuous). We compared bird responses to isopods with reactions to the , an edible roach very similar to isopods in size and appearance. Isopods were better protected from bird attacks than roaches; however, their color pattern did not affect the level of protection. Birds were able to differentiate isopods from the roach; in experiments, where we presented isopod and roach individuals together, the birds hesitated longer in attacking and observed both prey items for a longer time. Non-native species either profited from the generalization of the protection of native isopods or from neophobia. Some isopods elicited significantly more discomfort behavior in birds, suggesting differences in the chemical protection among the tested species.
陆生等足类动物(甲壳纲:等足目:潮虫亚目)有效保护自己免受鸟类捕食的能力从未得到过测试。它们有能分泌化学物质的腺体;此外,一些物种有明显的体色,这可能足以作为一种警戒信号。我们评估了等足类动物对鸟类的适口性。我们测试了在野外捕获的(因此对常见的本地等足类物种有一定经验)对以下等足类物种的反应:(本地,不显眼)、(本地,中等显眼)、(非本地,中等显眼)、(本地,显眼)和(非本地,显眼)。我们将鸟类对等足类动物的反应与对的反应进行了比较,是一种可食用的蟑螂,在大小和外观上与等足类动物非常相似。等足类动物比蟑螂更能抵御鸟类的攻击;然而,它们的颜色模式并没有影响保护程度。鸟类能够区分等足类动物和蟑螂;在我们将等足类动物和蟑螂个体放在一起展示的实验中,鸟类在攻击时犹豫的时间更长,并且对两种猎物观察的时间也更长。非本地物种要么从本地等足类动物保护的普遍化中受益,要么从新物恐惧中受益。一些等足类动物在鸟类中引发了明显更多的不适行为,这表明在所测试的物种中化学保护存在差异。