Ivanova Silviya, Prochazka Ondrej, Giannoudis Peter V, Tosounidis Theodoros, Tannast Moritz, Bastian Johannes D
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 10;14(14):4912. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144912.
: Acetabular fractures in older adults pose significant challenges due to bone fragility, complex fracture patterns, and increased comorbidities. Surgical management, including isolated open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and ORIF combined with acute total hip arthroplasty (THA) (combined hip procedure-CHP), have advanced considerably. Nevertheless, optimal postoperative rehabilitation and particularly weight-bearing (WB) recommendations remain controversial and inconsistent. This review aims to assess rehabilitation protocols, focusing on WB strategies following the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in older adults. It also examines differences in WB restrictions by surgical technique (ORIF vs. CHP) and their impact on recovery, complications, reoperations, and mortality. : A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (2006-2024) included studies involving patients aged ≥65 years treated surgically for displaced acetabular fractures. Data included WB protocols (full, partial, toe-touch), length of stay (LOS), healing, functional outcomes (mobility, Harris and Oxford Hip Scores), complications, reoperations, delayed THA, compliance, readmission, and mortality. Due to heterogeneity, findings were narratively synthesized. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB2. : Twenty studies involving 929 patients (530 isolated ORIF, 399 CHP) were analyzed. The overall mean follow-up was 3.5 years (range: 1-5.25 years). Postoperative WB protocols were reported in 19 studies (95%). Immediate full WB was permitted in 0% of isolated ORIF studies (0/13), with partial WB recommended by 62% (8/13) for durations typically between 6 and 12 weeks. On the other hand, immediate full WB was allowed in 53% (9/17) of CHP studies. Functional outcomes were moderate following isolated ORIF (mean HHS: 63-82 points), with delayed THA conversion rates ranging from 16.5% to 45%. CHP demonstrated superior functional outcomes (mean HHS: 70-92 points), earlier independent ambulation, and higher patient satisfaction (74-90%), yet increased orthopedic complications, including dislocations (8-11%) and implant loosening (up to 18%). LOS varied from 12 to 21 days (mean 16 days) for isolated ORIF and from 8 to 25 days (mean 17 days) for CHP. Readmission within 30 days was not explicitly reported in any study. Mortality at 1 year varied significantly (ORIF: 0-25%; CHP: 0-14%), increasing markedly at long-term follow-up (up to 42% ORIF, up to 70% CHP at five years). Compliance with WB restrictions was monitored in only two studies (11%). : Postoperative rehabilitation after acetabular fracture surgery in older adults remains inconsistent and lacks standardization. Combining ORIF with acute THA may enable earlier weight-bearing and improved short-term function but carries risks such as dislocation and implant loosening. In contrast, isolated ORIF avoids these implant-related complications but often requires prolonged weight-bearing restrictions. Robust evidence is still missing. Future trials are essential to establish standardized protocols that balance mechanical protection and functional recovery.
老年患者的髋臼骨折因骨质脆弱、骨折模式复杂以及合并症增多而带来重大挑战。手术治疗方法,包括单纯切开复位内固定术(ORIF)以及ORIF联合急性全髋关节置换术(THA)(联合髋关节手术-CHP),已经有了很大进展。然而,最佳的术后康复方案,尤其是负重(WB)建议仍存在争议且不一致。本综述旨在评估康复方案,重点关注老年患者髋臼骨折手术治疗后的负重策略。同时,研究不同手术技术(ORIF与CHP)在负重限制方面的差异及其对恢复、并发症、再次手术和死亡率的影响。
对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆(2006 - 2024年)进行系统综述,纳入了对年龄≥65岁的移位髋臼骨折患者进行手术治疗的研究。数据包括负重方案(完全负重、部分负重、脚尖触地负重)、住院时间(LOS)、愈合情况、功能结局(活动能力、Harris和Oxford髋关节评分)、并发症、再次手术、延迟THA、依从性、再次入院和死亡率。由于存在异质性,研究结果采用叙述性综合分析。使用ROBINS - I和RoB2评估偏倚风险。
分析了20项涉及929例患者(530例单纯ORIF,399例CHP)的研究。总体平均随访时间为3.5年(范围:1 - 5.25年)。19项研究(95%)报告了术后负重方案。在单纯ORIF研究中,0%允许立即完全负重(0/13),62%(8/13)建议部分负重,持续时间通常为6至12周。另一方面,在CHP研究中,53%(9/17)允许立即完全负重。单纯ORIF术后功能结局中等(平均HHS:63 - 82分),延迟THA转换率为16.5%至45%。CHP显示出更好的功能结局(平均HHS:70 - 92分)、更早的独立行走能力以及更高的患者满意度(74 - 90%),但骨科并发症增加,包括脱位(8 - 11%)和植入物松动(高达18%)。单纯ORIF的住院时间为12至21天(平均16天),CHP为8至25天(平均17天)。没有任何研究明确报告30天内的再次入院情况。1年时的死亡率差异显著(ORIF:0 - 25%;CHP:0 - 14%),长期随访时显著增加(5年时ORIF高达42%,CHP高达70%)。仅有两项研究(11%)监测了对负重限制的依从性。
老年患者髋臼骨折手术后的康复方案仍然不一致且缺乏标准化。将ORIF与急性THA相结合可能使患者更早负重并改善短期功能,但存在脱位和植入物松动等风险。相比之下,单纯ORIF可避免这些与植入物相关的并发症,但通常需要延长负重限制时间。目前仍缺乏有力证据。未来的试验对于建立平衡机械保护和功能恢复的标准化方案至关重要。